International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

ISSN: 2476-3772

The latest discoveries in all areas of reproduction and reproductive technology.

 

The role of the Coronavirus pandemic on childbearing intentions in Iranian women based on path analysis: A cross-sectional study

Published date: Feb 08 2023

Journal Title: International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine

Issue title: International Journal of Reproductive BioMedicine (IJRM): Volume 21, Issue No. 1

Pages: 43–52

DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i1.12665

Authors:

Mojdeh BanaeiMother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Nourossadat Karimann_kariman@yahoo.comMidwifery and Reproductive Health Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Hamid Sharif NiaTraditional and Complementary Medicine Research Center, Addiction Institute, Amol Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.

Tahereh Mokhtarian-GilaniStudent Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract:

Background: The Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) may lead to couples not being physically and mentally ready to assume a parenting role.


Objective: Given the changes in reproductive behaviors and the lack of accurate information about childbearing factors during the Coronavirus pandemic, this study was conducted to investigate the role of the COVID-19 pandemic in Iranian couples’ childbearing intentions based on the theory of planned behavior model.


Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 400 married Iranian women from July to October 2020 using official online popular social networks. Data were collected using a demographic checklist and the researchermade questionnaire, which was designed based on the main constructs of the planned behavior model.


Results: Testing the indirect relationships of the mediation model effect showed a positive relationship between knowledge (β = 0.226, p < 0.001) and subjective norms (β = 0.155, p = 0.001) about COVID-19. Anxiety about COVID-19 mediated the relationship of knowledge (β = 0.105, p = 0.009), attitude (β = -0.125, p = 0.002), subjective norms (β = 0.238, p < 0.001), and perceived behavioral control (β = 0.513, p < 0.001) about COVID-19 with childbearing intentions.


Conclusion: The results showed that COVID-19-induced anxiety can affect the relationship between the components of the theory of planned behavior model and childbearing intentions. Therefore, it is suggested that by designing appropriate interventions through anxiety-reducing and relaxation techniques, a fundamental step can be taken in increasing childbearing desires.

Key words: Iran, Delayed childbearing, Reproductive behavior, COVID-19, Attitude.

References:

[1] Rothan HA, Byrareddy SN. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak. J Autoimmun 2020; 109: 102433.


[2] Xiang Y-T, Yang Y, Li W, Zhang L, Zhang Q, Cheung T, et al. Timely mental health care for the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak is urgently needed. Lancet Psychiatry 2020; 7: 228– 229.


[3] Oshrieh Z, Tehranian N, Ebrahimi E, Keramat A, Hassani M, Kharaghani R. Childbearing intention and its associated factors among adolescent girls: A narrative review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2019; 25: 7–11.


[4] Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, Dulebohn SC, Di Napoli R. Features, evaluation and treatment coronavirus (COVID-19). Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing; 2020.


[5] Micelli E, Cito G, Cocci A, Polloni G, Russo GI, Minervini A, et al. Desire for parenthood at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: An insight into the Italian situation. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 2020; 41: 183–190.


[6] Banaei M, Ghasemi V, Saei Ghare Naz M, Kiani Z, RashidiFakari F, Banaei S, et al. Obstetrics and neonatal outcomes in pregnant women with COVID-19: A systematic review. Iran J Public Health 2020; 49: 38–47.


[7] Fan C, Lu W, Li K, Ding Y, Wang J. ACE2 expression in kidney and testis may cause kidney and testis infection in COVID-19 patients. Front Med 2021; 7: 563893.


[8] He Y, Wang J, Ren J, Zhao Y, Chen J, Chen X. Effect of COVID-19 on male reproductive system: A systematic review. Front Endocrinol 2021; 12: 677701.


[9] Bachrach CA, Morgan SP. A cognitive-social model of fertility intentions. Pop Dev Rev 2013; 39: 459–485.


[10] Pan L, Zhang X, Wang S, Zhao N, Zhao R, Ding B, et al. Determinants associated with self-management behavior among type 2 diabetes patients in China: A structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior. Int J Clin Health Psychol 2023; 23: 100332.


[11] Caplescu R. Using the theory of planned behaviour to study fertility intentions in Romania. Procedia Economics and Finance 2014; 10: 125–133.


[12] Drążkowski D, Trepanowski R. Reactance and perceived disease severity as determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intention: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychol Health Med 2022; 27: 2171–2178.


[13] Roy D, Tripathy S, Kar SK, Sharma N, Verma SK, Kaushal V. Study of knowledge, attitude, anxiety & perceived mental healthcare need in Indian population during COVID-19 pandemic. Asian J Psychiatr 2020; 51: 102083.


[14] Peterson BD, Pirritano M, Tucker L, Lampic C. Fertility awareness and parenting attitudes among American male and female undergraduate university students. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 1375–1382.


[15] Ajzen I, Klobas J. Fertility intentions: An approach based on the theory of planned behavior. Demographic Res 2013; 29: 203–232.


[16] Li X, Fan Y, Assanangkornchai S, McNeil EB. Application of the theory of planned behavior to couples’ fertility decision-making in Inner Mongolia, China. PloS One 2019; 14: e0.221526.


[17] Williamson LEA, Lawson KL. Young women’s intentions to delay childbearing: A test of the theory of planned behaviour. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2015; 33: 205–213.


[18] Mencarini L, Vignoli D, Gottard A. Fertility intentions and outcomes: Implementing the theory of planned behavior with graphical models. Adv Life Course Res 2015; 23: 14–28.


[19] Vignoli D, Bazzani G, Guetto R, Minello A, Pirani E. Uncertainty and narratives of the future: A theoretical framework for contemporary fertility. In: Schoen R. Analyzing contemporary fertility. Cham: Springer; 2020.


[20] Malicka I, Mynarska M, Świderska J. Perceived consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic and childbearing intentions in Poland. J Fam Res 2021; 33: 674–702.


[21] Söderberg M, Christensson K, Lundgren I, Hildingsson I. Women’s attitudes towards fertility and childbearing - A study based on a national sample of Swedish women validating the attitudes to fertility and childbearing scale (AFCS). Sex Reprod Healthc 2015; 6: 54–58.


[22] Zare Z, Saffari E, Kiaee Tabar R. [Fertility motivations and their relation with attitude towards government incentives for childbearing in women of reproductive age]. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci 2018; 28: 104–114. (in Persian)


[23] Shin H, Lee J, Kim SJ, Jo M. Attitudes towards parenthood and fertility awareness in female and male university students in South Korea. Child Health Nurs Res 2020; 26: 329–337.


[24] Barber JS. Ideational influences on the transition to parenthood: Attitudes toward childbearing and competing alternatives. Soc Psychol Q 2001; 64: 101–127.


[25] Yassa M, Birol P, Yirmibes C, Usta C, Haydar A, Yassa A, et al. Near-term pregnant women’s attitude toward, concern about and knowledge of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2020; 33: 3827–3834.


[26] Voicu M, Bădoi D. Fertility and the COVID-19 crisis: Do gender roles really matter? Eur Soc 2021; 23 (Suppl.): S199–S214.


[27] Liu X, Chen M, Wang Y, Sun L, Zhang J, Shi Y, et al. Prenatal anxiety and obstetric decisions among pregnant women in Wuhan and Chongqing during the COVID-19 outbreak: A cross-sectional study. BJOG 2020; 127: 1229 1240.


[28] Sögüt S, Dolu İ, Cangöl E. The relationship between COVID19 knowledge levels and anxiety states of midwifery students during the outbreak: A cross-sectional web-based survey. Perspect Psychiatr Care 2021; 57: 246–252.


[29] Bäuerle A, Teufel M, Musche V, Weismüller B, Kohler H, Hetkamp M, et al. Increased generalized anxiety, depression and distress during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Germany. J Public Health 2020; 42: 672–678.


[30] Nandi A, Mazumdar S, Behrman JR. The effect of natural disaster on fertility, birth spacing, and child sex ratio: Evidence from a major earthquake in India. J Popul Econ 2018; 31: 267– 293.


[31] Favre G, Pomar L, Musso D, Baud D. 2019-nCoV epidemic: What about pregnancies? Lancet 2020; 395: e40.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

144 Abstract Views

131 PDF Downloads