Published date: Nov 26 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The Economies of the Balkan and the Eastern European Countries in the changing World (EBEEC 2018)

Pages: 50–68

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3530

I Tsoukalidisyiannis.tsoukalidis@gmail.com

A Kostas

A G Karasavvoglou

Natural and Cultural Heritage, including intangible cultural heritage, are precious assets for local development in many districts and local communities which could be significantly beneficial for them. In many cases, Local Authorities use funding programs from the State, European Union or other sources for investments to exploit such assets. Such public investments for exploitation activities are planned and incorporate description of parameters of sustainability, feasibility analysis and many times master plans, place branding plans, marketing plans and business plans. In many cases, especially in small and medium size local authorities, but not only, it is found out that such approach remains theoretical and although it could be realistic, it is distant from the actual performance. In this paper, we examine a case where a local authority did proceed with such an investment to exploit a specific mixed natural and cultural asset and we determine factors that are prerequisites for the successful and sustainable tourism development related to that asset. Success factors include a holistic approach, the devotion of appropriate people in the management and marketing of the asset, a road map linked to the deployment of the short and medium term marketing plan, the selection of the appropriate indicators and methodology of measuring. Furthermore, we do examine the importance of the involvement of all stakeholders, without exclusions.

Keywords: local development, sustainability, cultural and natural heritage

[1] Global Sustainable Tourism Council (2018). Making Destinations Sustainable. [Online] Available at: https://www.gstcouncil.org/about/about-us/ [Accessed 15 February 2018].


[2] Region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace (2014). Operational Programme based on the objective “Investments for the development and employment” - CCI 2014GR16M2OP014 Region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace. Komotini: Intermediate Managing Authority of Region of Eastern Macedonia and Thrace.


[3] Managing Authority of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes – Greece (2014a). Cooperation programmes under the European territorial cooperation goal - CCI 2014TC16RFCB022 Interreg V-A Greece-Bulgaria. Thessaloniki: Managing Authority of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes.


[4] Managing Authority of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes – Greece (2014b). Balkan - Mediterranean 2014-2020 - CCI 2014TC16M4TN003 TNCP Balkan – Mediterranean 2014 – 2020. Thessaloniki: Managing Authority of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes.


[5] Managing Authority of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes – Greece (2015). ETC ADRION - CCI 2014TC16M4TN002 Interreg V-B Adriatic-Ionian cooperation programme 2014-2020. Thessaloniki: Managing Authority of the European Territorial Cooperation Programmes.


[6] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman.


[7] Klamer, A., Petrova, L., and Mignosa, A. (2006). Financing the arts and culture in the European Union. [Online] Available at: http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/files/ 134/en/Financing_the_Arts_and_Culture_in_the_EU.pdf [Accessed 28 February 2018]. Brussels: European Parliament.


[8] Council of Europe (2011). Compendium Country Director. [Online], Available at: www. culturalpolicies.net/web/countries.php [Accessed 26 March 2018].


[9] Inkei, P. (2011). Survey with governments on culture budgets and the financial crisis and culture, in Council of Europe Steering Committee for Culture, 10th Plenary Session. Strasbourg, 3-4 May 2011. Strasbourg: Directorate of Culture and Cultural and Natural Heritage.


[10] Mergos, G. (2017). Cultural heritage and the economic development agenda, in G. Mergos and N. Patsavos (eds.) Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development, 81- 96. Chania: Technical University of Crete.


[11] Prontzas, P. (2017). Calculating the economic value of investments in cultural heritage: Methods and approaches, in G. Mergos and N. Patsavos (eds.) Cultural Heritage and Sustainable Development, 221-227. Chania: Technical University of Crete.


[12] Anon (2015b). From Lille 2004 to Lille 3000. The voyage goes on, in The Culture for Cities and Regions team (ed.) Successful investments in culture in European cities and regions: a catalogue of case studies, 140-143, Brussels: Eurocities.


[13] Millier Dickinson Blais (2012). Municipal Cultural Plan for the Township of Springwater. Toronto: Millier Dickinson Blais.


[14] Tsoukalidis, I. (2015a). Development of Added Value – Deliverable No2. Identification of the potential and means of capitalization by the educational community, including the potential for actions together with nearby assets. Kavala: DOMI KOINEP.


[15] Tsoukalidis, I. and Tzatzari, G. (2015). Development of Added Value – Deliverable No8. Marketing and Promotion Plan of the path (competitive advantages) and setting of requirements to gain added value based on results. Kavala: DOMI KOINEP.


[16] Porter, M. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: The Free Press.


[17] Porter, M. (2008). The Five Competitive Forces That Shape Strategy. Harvard Business Review, January 2008, pp. 86 - 104.


[18] Tsoukalidis, I. (2015b). Development of Added Value – Deliverable No4. Identification of synergies that will be developed and the methods and tools of essential links with other structures of tourism interest in the district. Kavala: DOMI KOINEP.


[19] Tsoukalidis, I. (2015c). Development of Added Value – Deliverable No6. Setting of directions for promotion in Greece and abroad to special and generic audience, using specific reeling in tools. Kavala: DOMI KOINEP.


[20] Anon (2007). Τα Ευρωπαϊκά και Εθνικά μονοπάτια (The European and National eco-paths) [Online] Available at: www.pezoporia.gr/pez/routes.asp?toggle=2 [Accessed at 30 November 2015].


[21] Kouparanis, P. (2013). Μία ευκαιρία επέκτασης της τουριστικής σαιζόν (An opportunity to extend the tourism season). [Online] Deutsche Welle. Available at: www.dw.com/el/μια-ευκαιρία-επέκτασης-της-τουριστικής-σαιζόν/a-17301142 [Accessed at 30 September 2015].


[22] Anon (2010). Walking Facts and Figures 2: Participation in Walking. [Online] Ramblers. Available at: www.ramblers.org.uk/$\sim$/media/Files/What we do/factsandfigures-2-participation-0510.pdf [Accessed at 2 December 2015].


[23] Anon (2014). Walking and cycling statistics. [Online] GOV.UK. Available at: www. gov.uk/government/collections/ walking-and-cycling-statistics [Accessed at 2 December 2015].


[24] Anon (2015a). Number of participants in hiking in the United States from 2006 to 2014. [Online] Statistica.com. Available at: www.statista.com/statistics/191240/ participants-in-hiking-in-the-us-since-2006 [Accessed at 7 December 2015].


[25] Tsoukalidis, I. (2015d). Development of Added Value – Deliverable No7. Specification of a flexible road map for exploitation of the asset, that will keep the asset sustainable and will have positive impact on the local economy. Kavala: DOMI KOINEP.


[26] Freeman, R. E. and Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and Stakeholders: A new perspective on Corporate Governance. California Management Review, Vol. 25, Issue 3, pp. 88-106.


[27] Muran, S. (2015). Why you Need a Roadmap. Slalom. [Online] Available at https: //www.slalom.com/ thinking/roadmap [Accessed at 16 November 2015].


[28] Tsoukalidis, I. (2015e). Development of Added Value – Deliverable No7. Definition of specific measurable direct and indirect indicators, related to the investment and the added value for the market. Kavala: DOMI KOINEP.


[29] DG Enterprise and Industry (2013). European Tourism Indicator System Toolkit. Brussels: European Union.