KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Subscribe to Content Alerts
Navigation

Effectiveness of Economic Adjustment Programmes for Debt Crises Implemented in the Southern European Union Countries

Published date: Nov 26 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The Economies of the Balkan and the Eastern European Countries in the changing World (EBEEC 2018)

Pages: 33–49

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3529

Authors:
Abstract:
This article addresses the effectiveness of the economic adjustment programmes for debt crises implemented in the southern European Union countries, a rather contemporary, as well as disputable, issue. All South-European countries that faced a debt crisis had already adopted the European single currency – Euro. Our literature review depicts contemporary research work on debt crises, their economic and social implications either generally or, more relative to our work, South-European-country specific. Our research work is based on a wide range of statistical indices, in an effort to appreciate the effectiveness of the economic adjustment programmes, holistically. The countries addressed were Greece, Portugal, Spain and Cyprus. The applied statistical indices were grouped in six pillars that are considered to be essential to social prosperity. These pillars are financial prosperity, employment, healthcare, education, governance and entrepreneurship. All data were eventually incorporated in a single index, namely `Social Prosperity Index', in an attempt to attain a holistic view on the effectiveness of these programmes. This approach contradicts the mainstream approach of pure financially oriented assessments. Portugal scores first in this appraisal – not only fully recovering but even improving social prosperity standards for its citizens – followed closely by Spain and Cyprus. Greece recorded the worst classification, albeit the index is recovering to pro-crisis levels. Our empirical results suggest that these programmes had a significant impact on the countries that were implemented. In solely financial terms, the programmes proved to be quite effective for all countries. However, their effectiveness is rather questionable if we take into consideration all pillars of social prosperity. The most problematic pillar is employment, which challenges governments and especially their citizens. European and sovereign policies must urgently address employment problems, whereas economists are already talking about a `lost generation'.
 
 
Keywords: sovereign debt crisis, Euro, social prosperity, economic adjustment programmes, South Europe
 
References:

[1] Modigliani, F. (1961). Long-run implications of alternative fiscal policies and the burden of the national debt. The Economic Journal, vol. 71, no. 284, pp. 730–755.


[2] Diamond, P. (1965). National debt in a neoclassical growth model. American Economic Review, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1126–1150.


[3] Pisani-Ferry, J., Sapir, A., and Wolff, G. (2013). EU-IMF Assistance to Euro area countries: An early assessment. Bruegel Blueprint Series, vol. XIX.


[4] Krugman, P. (1988). Financing vs. Forgiving a debt overhang. Journal of Development Economics, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 253–268.


[5] Cole, H. L. and Kehoe, T. (2000). Self-fulfilling debt crises. Review of Economic Studies, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 91–116.


[6] Checherita, C. and Rother, P. (2010). The Impact of High and Growing Government Debt on Economic Growth an Empirical Investigation for the Euro Area. Working Paper Series, European Central Bank, 1237.


[7] ECB. (2012). Analysing government debt sustainability in the Euro area. Monthly Bulletin, April.


[8] Lane, P. R. (2012). The European sovereign debt crisis., Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 49–68.


[9] Detlef, A. (2012). Causes of the Sovereign Debt Crisis. Retrieved from http:// www.e-ir.info/2012/04/16/causes-of-thesovereign-debt-crisis/ (accessed on 21 October 2015).


[10] Laopodis, N. T. (2004). Monetary policy implications of co-movements among longterm interest rates. SSRN Electronic Journal, vol.14, pp. 135–164.


[11] De Grauwe, P. and Ji, Y. (2013). Self-fulfilling crises in the Eurozone: An empirical test. Journal of International Money and Finance, vol. 34, pp. 15–36.


[12] European Commission. (2014). A comprehensive EU response to the financial crisis: Substantial progress towards a strong financial framework for Europe and a banking union for the eurozone. MEMO 14/244/28-03-2014.


[13] Blundell-Wignall, A. (2012). Solving the financial and sovereign debt crisis in Europe. OECD Journal: Financial Market Trends, no. 2, pp. 201–224.


[14] Hallet, H. A. and Oliva, J. C. M. (2015). The importance of trade and capital imbalances in the European debt crisis. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 37, pp. 229–252.


[15] Sklias P., Spyros, R., and Georgios, M. (2014). Keynes and the Eurozone’s crisis: Towards a fiscal union. Elsevier, Procedia Economics and Finance, vol. 9, pp. 66–73.


[16] Guerreiro, D. (2014). Is the European debt crisis a mere balance of payments crisis? Economic Modelling, vol. 44, pp. S50–S56.


[17] Hassel, A. (2014). Adjustments in the Eurozone: Varieties of capitalism and the crisis in southern Europe, LEQS Paper, no. 76.


[18] Laeven, L. and Valencia, F. (2012). Systemic Banking Crises Database: An Update. IMF Working Paper 12/163.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

342 Abstract Views

171 PDF Downloads