KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Is Job Performance Affected By Job Motivation and Job Satisfaction?

Published date: Nov 12 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation (ICOI-2018)

Pages:

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3435

Authors:
Abstract:

This study examines three variables: Job Motivation (X1 ) and Job Satisfaction (X2 ) as dependent variables, Organizational Commitment (Z) as an intervening variable, and Employees’ Performance (Y) as an independent variable. A total of 30 full-time staff-level employees participated in this study. The major hypotheses of the study were assessed through Path Analysis using SPSS 17.0 version. The result of this study showed that job motivation and job satisfaction have no significant influence toward employees’ performance, but does have a significant influence toward organizational commitment. It was also found that organizational commitment has a significant influence toward employees’ performance. This means that organizational commitment is a full mediation in this model of conceptual framework.

 

 

Keywords: job motivation, job satisfaction, employee performance, organizational commitment

References:

[1] Allen, N. J. and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 63, pp. 1–8.


[2] As’ad, M. (1987). Psikologi Industri. Yogyakarta: Liberty


[3] Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research – Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173–1182.


[4] Dessler, G. (2006). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Indeks.


[5] Gomes, F. C. (2003). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Terjemahan Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.


[6] Ghozali, I. (2005). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS (Edisi ke 3). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.


[7] Ghozali, I. (2009). Model Persamaan Struktural Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program AMOS 16.0 (Edisi 4). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.


[8] Handoko, T. H. (2001). Manajemen Personalia dan Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: BPFE.


[9] Hasibuan, M. (2001). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Jakarta.


[10] Jaros, S. (2007). Meyer and Allen Model of Organizational Commitment: Measurement Issues. Retrieved from http://www.stevejaros.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/ 08/Jaros-ICFAI-2007-Meyer-and-Allen1.pdf (accessed on May 11, 2013).


[11] Kreitner, R. and Kinicki, A. (2001). Organizational Behavior (fifth edition, international edition). Mc Graw-Hill Companies, Inc.


[12] Luthans, F. (1989). Organizational Behavior (fifth edition, international edition). Singapore: McGraw-Hill.


[13] McClelland, D. C. (1971). Managing People at Work. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing House.


[14] McClelland, D. C. and Boyatzis, R. E. (1982). Leadership motive pattern and long term success in management. Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 737–743.


[15] Nawawi, H. (1996). Manajemen SDM. Jakarta: Gadjah Mada Universitas Press.


[16] Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., and Mowday, R. T. (1983). Organizational commitment job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology.


[17] Rivai, V. (2004). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Untuk Perusahaan: Dari teori ke praktek (edisi pertama). Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.


[18] Robbins, S. P. (2003). Perilaku Organisasi, Alih bahasa Benyamin Molan. Jakarta: Gramedia.


[19] Simamora. (1997). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogyakarta: STIE YKPN (Edisi II Cetakan pertama).


[20] Sekaran, U. and Roger, B. (2003). Research Method of Business, A Skill Building Approach (fifth edition). John Wiley and Sons.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

6032 Abstract Views

796 PDF Downloads