Published date:Jun 04 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Research Conference on Higher Education

Pages:30–42

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i6.2372

A D Yazonadyazon_13@yahoo.com

K Ang-Manaig

J F B Tesoro

A descriptive - correlational research was done to determine relationship between teacher’s philosophy, teaching style, and performance. The teacher-respondents is dominated by female with the age of early fortys up to late fiftys and finished graduate studies. Further, majority of them are at most Assistant Professors and
serving the institution for more than three decades now. More than 50% of the teacher-respondents got a Common Criteria Evaluation and Qualitative Contribution Evaluation points of 65 to 87 and 89% to 91% respectively. Almost 50% of the teacher respondents are progressivists who strongly believe that teaching should prepare students for analyzing and solving the types of problems they will face outside the classroom. More than half of the respondents have somewhat individualized style of teaching which clearly means that majority of the teacher respondents focused to approximately individualized or student-centered instruction and assessment. It was found out that teacher-respondent’s performance differs significantly when they were grouped according to highest educational attainment, academic rank, and years in service. However, the data are not sufficient enough to support the existence of significant correlations between teacher’s philosophy, teaching style, and performance.

Keywords: teaching and learning; educational philosophy; teaching style; performance.

[1] Anspaugh, D. J., Hamrick, M. H., & Rosato, F. D. (2003). Wellness: Concepts and applications (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.


[2] Aspinwall, L. G., & Taylor, S.E. (1992). Modeling cognitive adaptation: A longitudinal investigation of the impact of individual differences and coping on college adjustment and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 989- 1003. doi: 10.1037/0022- 3514.63.6.989


[3] Aun, W., Kimura, L., Hern, C. and Ahmad, S. (2011), “Psychological Factors in Academic Performance among College Students”, Proceeding of ITCTL 2011, 3rd International Conference on Teaching and Learning, Parkroyal Penang, Penang, Malaysia.


[4] Earnest, D. R., & Dwyer, W. O. (2010). In their own words: An online strategy for increasing stress-coping skills among college freshmen. College Student Journal, 44(4), 888-900. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com/library/1G1-248733622/ in-their-own- words-an online-strategy-for-increasing on July 2017


[5] Folkman, S. and Lazarus, R. S. (1988). Manual for the ways of coping questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.


[6] Kadhiravan, S. and Kumar, K. (2012), “Enhancing Stress Coping Skills among College Students”, Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, Vol. 4, No. 1, Pp. 2231–4172.


[7] Khan, M. (2013). Academic Self-Efficacy, Coping, and Academic Performance in College. International Journal of Undergraduate Research and Creative Activities.


[8] Lenz, S. (2010). Exploring college students’ perception of their coping styles. LOGOS: A Journal of Undergraduate Research, 3, 68-82. Retrieved from http://www.missouristate.edu/assets/honors/Logos2010_text.pdf on July 2017


[9] Mahajan, A. (2010), “Stress in Medical Education: A Global Issue or much Ado about Nothing Specific”, South-East Asian Journal of Medical Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, Pp. 9–13.


[10] Pajares F. (2002). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic contexts: An outline.


[11] Sullivan, J. (2010), “Preliminary Psychometric Data for the Academic Coping Strategies Scale”, Assessment for Effective Intervention, Vol. 35, No. 2, Pp. 114– 127.


[12] Yasin, M. and Dzulkifli, M. (2009), “Differences in Psychological Problems between Low and High Achieving Students”, The Journal of Behavioural Science, Vol. 4, No. 1, Pp. 60–71.