Published date: Nov 01 2018

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: The Fifth International Luria Memorial Congress «Lurian Approach in International Psychological Science»

Pages: 555–561

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i8.3313

L LiutskoLiudmila.Liutsko@Isglobal.org

R Muiños

J Maria Tous-Ral

Rose (1970) showed that women had more symmetrical precision in movements in hands, whereas men performed more asymmetrically (with dominance for right hand). These findings were congruent with Ananiev’s (1968) scheme differentiated for sexes, in which for men there was a need for use of additional adaptive mechanisms (asymmetry) whereas women passed with basic ones (symmetry). Our study aimed
to check the hands symmetry/asymmetry and correlations in fine motor precision and speed in both sexes and how they change in different age groups. The results of our study showed that the highest asymmetry in fine motor precision was related (for both sex groups and among all movement types) to the developmental period
of life (12-17 years old) followed by group age of 64-95 due to ageing processes. In our study women performed with less asymmetry between both hands for majority of observable variables compared to men in all age groups. The highest frequency of asymmetrical performance in fine motor precision for both sexes was observed in the Frontal movement type, followed by the Transversal, and least, in the Sagittal. For the speed performance, the highest frequency of asymmetrical performance was shown in the Transversal movement type.

Keywords: fine motor precision; speed; sex differences; age-depended differences; Proprioceptive diagnostics; M.K.P.

[1] Ananiev, B.G. (1968). Человек как пpедмет познания. [Man as an object of knowledge] Л.: Изд-во ЛГУ, 339 с. [In Russian]


[2] Heuninckx, S., Wenderoth, N., Debaere, F., Peeters, R., & Swinnen, S. P. (2005). Neural basis of aging: the penetration of cognition into action control. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(29), 6787-6796.


[3] Liutsko, L. (2016). Sex differences in fine motor performance (proprioceptive and visual-proprioceptive sensory conditions). PAID, 101, 495-496.


[4] Liutsko, L., Muiños, R., & Tous, J.M. (2014). Age-related differences in proprioceptive and visuo-proprioceptive function in relation to fine motor behaviour. European Journal of Ageing, 11(3), 221-232. doi: 10.1007/s10433-013-0304-6.


[5] Liutsko, L. (2014). Age and sex differences in proprioception (fine motor performance). Scholars’ Press, ISBN-10: 3639718372; ISBN-13: 978-3639718379


[6] Liutsko, L., Tous, J.M., Veraksa, A., & Leonov, S. (2015). Proprioceptive indicators (precision, speed and personality) of age-depended differences for traffic security. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 187: 491-496.


[7] Mira, E. (1958). Myokinetic psychodiagnosis. (M. K. P.) New York: Logos


[8] Przybyla, A., Haaland, K., Bagesteiro, L., Saiburg, R. (2011). Motor asymmetry reduction in older adults. Neuroscience Letters, 489(2): 99-104 http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.11.074


[9] Rose, N.A. [Розе Н. А.] (1970). Психомотоpика взpослого человека. [The adult’s psychomotricity] Л., 1970. [In Russian]


[10] Stern, J., Oster P, & Newport, K. (1980) Reaction time measures, hemispheric specialization, and age. In: Aging in the 1980 by Poon, L. (Ed.), Psychological issues, 309-326. doi: 10.1037/10050-022


[11] Tous Ral, J. M., Muiños, R., Tous O., & Tous Rovirosa, J.M. (2012). Diagnóstico propioceptivo del temperamento y el carácter. Edicions Universitat Barcelona. [In Spanish]


[12] Tous Ral, J.M., & Liutsko, L. (2014). Human errors: their psychophysical bases and the Proprioceptive Diagnosis of Temperament and Character (DP-TC) as a tool for measuring. Psychology in Russia: State of the art, 7(2).


[13] Tous-Ral, J.M., Muiños, R., Liutsko, L., & Forero, C.G. (2012). Effects of sensory information, movement direction and hand use on fine motor precision. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115(1): 261-272. doi: 10.2466/25.22.24.PMS.115.4.261-272