Published date: Jun 19 2018

Journal Title: KnE Life Sciences

Issue title: International Conference of Occupational Health and Safety (ICOHS 2017)

Pages: 114–126

DOI: 10.18502/kls.v4i5.2545

S Widodo

Z Djunaidizul@ui.ac.id

Various important aspects of the operational activities of the oil and gas industry must receive attention, in an effort to create a safe environment and operation for both workers and the surrounding community. This aspect relates not only to installations and workers, but the process of transport and distribution of oil and gas through pipes also. Failure on the offshore gas pipelines can cause some risks that can be harmful
to humans and the environment around the pipeline in case of leakage or even an explosion. The failure may be due to several factors, including leakage of the lining of pipelines due corrosion risks. Various studies and case reports indicate the level of accidents or fires and leaking offshore gas pipeline is still going on. An analysis
of safety barriers corrosion risks offshore gas pipeline was conducted to determine the performance levels of pipeline safety barriers with a case study on an offshore gas pipeline wells A, PT. XYZ. In doing analysis, three parameters were used, namely functionality, reliability and robustness. This research was conducted with descriptive analytic design using secondary data that has available in the company. This study illustrates the performance of the pipeline safety barriers, refers to the pipeline level of risk, and ultimately a pipeline safety level will be obtained as reference in the operation.

Keywords: offshore, pipeline, safety barriers, risk, corrosion, pipeline safety level

[1] US. DOT. (2016). Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). Retrieved from https://www.phmsa.dot.gov/ (accessed on 21 March 2017).


[2] Rausand, M. (2011). Risk Assessment: Theory, Methods, and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, INC., Publication.


[3] Muhlbauer, W. K. (2004). Pipeline Risk management Manual: Ideas, techniques, and Resources (3rd edition). Burlington: Elsevier.


[4] API. STD. 1160. (2013). Managing System Integrity for Hazardous Liquid Pipelines. American Petroleum Institute.


[5] Keputusan Menteri Pertambangan dan Energi. (1997). Keselamatan Kerja Pipa Penyalur Minyak dan Gas Bumi, Nomor 300.K/38/M.PE/1997.


[6] Solihin, M. and Yudi, M. (2007). Tingkat Kehandalan Pipeline Pada Transportasi Minyak dan Gas Dengan Menggunakan Pipeline Integrity Management System (PIMS), in Proceeding Simposium Nasional IATMI 25 – 28 Juli 2007, UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta. PT. Radiant Utama Interinsco. Jakarta.


[7] OED. (2005). Oxford English dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.


[8] PSA/RNNS. (2002). The development in the risk level on the Norwegian Continental Shelf—Requirements for registration of the performance of safety barriers. Letter to the oil companies (in Norwegian). Rev 9. 17.06.2002. Norway, Stavanger: Petroleum Safety Authority.


[9] Hollnagel, E. (1999). Memo—Accident Analysis and Barrier Functions. Halden: IFE.


[10] Sklet, S. (2006). Safety Barriers: Definition, Classification, and Performance. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 19, pp. 494–506.


[11] Rollenhagen, C. (2003). To investigate accidents, theory and practice (In Swedish; Att utreda olycksfall, Teori och praktik). Lund: Student literature.


[12] Neogy, P., Hanson, A. L., Davis, P. R., et al. (1996). Hazard and Barrier analysis guidance document, Rev. 0. US Department of Energy (DoE), EH-33 Office of Operating Experience Analysis and Feedback.


[13] Taylor, R. J. (1998). Methods for Assessment of Weapon Safety. Glumso, DK: Institute for Technical System Analysis.


[14] Andersen, H., Casal, J., Dandrieux, A., et al. (2004). ARAMIS—User Guide. EC Contract number EVG1-CT-2001-00036.


[15] XYZ. (2014). Procedure for Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, & Risk Control. XYZ.HSE.21.P.001.