Published date:Mar 11 2021

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Annual International Conference on Language and Literature

Pages:377-387

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v5i4.8697

Kardian Ishak Siregarkardianishaksiregar@gmail.comUniversitas Islam Sumatra Utara (UISU), Medan, Indonesia

M ManugerenUniversitas Islam Sumatra Utara (UISU), Medan, Indonesia

Purwarno PurwarnoUniversitas Islam Sumatra Utara (UISU), Medan, Indonesia

This study aimed to analyze the symbolic meanings of Tepak Sirih in weddings conducted at Desa Mahato Kecamatan Tambusai Utara Kabupaten Rokan Hulu Provinsi Riau, predominantly by the Malay community. Descriptive qualitative methods were applied in the study. Social phenomena occurring naturally were described, with the aim of helping us to understand the world in which we live. The main theory to support this study is the theory of Semiotics. Data collection was through observation, interviews, questionnaires and documentation with 20 key informants consisting of community leaders, scholars and community members. There are seven forms of symbolic meanings in Tepak Sirih: pinang (areca nut), which symbolizes good offspring of good character, honesty and a high degree; kapur (lime), which symbolizes kindness and sincerity, but when in a predicament one will turn aggressive and angry; gambir (gambier), which symbolizes determination; tembakau (tobacco), which symbolizes a steadfast heart and a readiness to sacrifice for all things; cengkih (cloves), which symbolizes the ability to maintain a reputation; sirih (betel Leaves), which symbolizes patience, brotherhood and unity; and kacip (scoop used primarily for gouging areca nut), which symbolizes a mutual agreement in making good decisions. The seven forms of Tepak Sirih are compulsory in the wedding with the main objective being to achieve a happy, harmonious and peaceful life for the bride and bridegroom and their offspring, which is in line with the general concept of marriage.

Keywords: honesty, kindness, self-determination, steadfast, reputation, patience

[1] Aksan, N., et al. (2009). Symbolic Interaction Theory. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 902-904.

[2] Ali, L. (1991). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

[3] Blumer, H. (1986). Symbolic Interactionism Perspective and Method. London, England: University of California Press Ltd.

[4] Broeck, A., et al. (2010). Capturing Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness at Work: Construction and Initial Validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Issue 83, pp. 981-1002.

[5] Buhanudin, S. (2000). Etika Individual (Pola Dasar Filsafat Moral). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

[6] Del Casino, V. J. and Thien, D. (2009). Symbolic Interactionism. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography. Oxford, Elsevier, vol. 11, pp. 132–137.

[7] Dennis, A. and Smith, G. (2015). Interactionism, Symbolic. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier, 2nd edition, vol 12, pp. 352–356.

[8] Firmanto, A. (2019). Pragmatism-Philosophy of John Dewey’s Education: Role and Position in Learning Information Literacy (Study in Educational Psychology). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Atlantis Press.

[9] Al Mudra, M. (2006). Tepak Sirih. Yogyakarta: Balai Kajian dan Pengembangan Budaya Melayu.

[10] Mulyana, D. (2003). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pengantar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

[11] Mustari, M. (2014). Nilai Karakter Refleksi Untuk Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

[12] Panjaitan, I. P. and Manugeren, M. (2019). Symbolic Meanings Of Kembar Mayang In Javanese Wedding Ceremony At Desa Medan Sinembah Kecamatan Tanjung Morawa Kabupaten Deli Serdang. Journal of Language, vol. 1, issue 1, pp. 1-10.

[13] Sogiono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

[14] White, R. E., Carlson, S. M. and David Zelazo, P. (2019). Symbolic Thought. Reference Module in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology, vol. 13, Issue 3, pp. 273-298.