Published date:Mar 11 2021

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Annual International Conference on Language and Literature

Pages:328-337

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v5i4.8692

Ibnu Ajan Hasibuanibnuhsb95@gmail.comUniversity of Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Ade IrianiUniversity of Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Nur AinunUniversity of Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

Butriani Mitra AnggrainiUniversity of Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia

This study aimed to analyze the ecolexicon and morphology by typology in the community of Mandailing (BM) agriculture. Qualitative methods were used. Data were collected using several stages such as interviews, self-examination, documenting and note-taking. The study was carried out in areas where income was dominated by farming, precisely in South Tapanuli Regency. The results showed that the biotic environment in the lexicon was 36 or around 70.5%, and the abiotic environment was 15 or around 29.5%. The typology of words was dominated by nominal (39), verbs (7), and adjectives (2). Based on the exposure to ecolexicon forms and typologies found in the Mandailing language, several conclusions can be drawn: the lexicon found in BM has affixations such as prefixes (si-); there are other prefixes (ma-, mam-, mar-, mang-); and the suffix form (-on) is often used to express farming activities, when associated with nouns, which is an activity that is carried out to indicate the type of rice and banana. The main reason for the loss of the lexicon is that many traditional activities have been replaced by modern means.

Keywords: Ecolinguistic, Mandailing, Community Agriculture

[1] Haugen, E. (1972). The Ecology of Language. Stanford: Standford University Press.

[2] Mbete, A. M. (2011). Ilmu Bahasa, Lingkungan Bahasa dan Bahasa Lingkungan. Bahan Matrikulasi bagi Karya Siswa Program Magister Linguistik. Denpasar: Program Pascasarjana UNUD.

[3] Mbete, A. M. (2013). Penuntun Singkat Penulisan Proposal Penelitian Ekolinguistik. Denpasar: Vidia.

[4] Moleong, J. L. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

[5] Suktiningsih, W. (2016). Leksikon Fauna Masyarakatsunda: Kajian Ekolinguistik. Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, vol. 2, issue 1, pp. 142-160.

[6] Warami, H. (2013). Khazanah Pengetahuan Lokal Etnik Waropen-Papua: Studi Awal Ekolinguistik. Langua: Journal of Linguistic Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-8. Medan: Lembaga Kajian Ekolinguistik.