Published date:Mar 11 2021

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Annual International Conference on Language and Literature

Pages:308-317

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v5i4.8690

Hidayati .yatihida853@gmail.comFakulas Bahasa dan Komunikasi, Universitas Harapan, Medan

Aflina .Fakulas Bahasa dan Komunikasi, Universitas Harapan, Medan

Arifuddin .Fakulas Bahasa dan Komunikasi, Universitas Harapan, Medan

This research is based on people’s behavior in communicating on social media, especially Facebook, which is currently developing without boundaries. In expressing their thoughts, a person often does not maintain ethics and provisions in communicating on social media. For personal gain, individuals or groups of people use language for the purpose of humiliating, insulting, degrading and defaming other individuals or groups of society they dislike. This phenomenon is widely known as hate speech. In line with the Pragmatic Approach, referring to the study of language use with its actual usage aspects, the utterances produced by language users have an effect that could influence the listener to grasp the meaning conveyed and take action as a result of the utterance. This study aims to reveal the types of hate speech on social media based on the criteria developed by Austin, and the meaning of hate speech spoken by individuals to other individuals on Facebook social media, using qualitative descriptive methods. The results show that hate speech on social media can be classified based on illocutionary acts developed by Austin, into verdictive, behabitives, and expositive.

Keywords: Pragmatics, social media, illocutionary acts, hate speech

[1] Haughman, B. (2009). Research Analysis. London: Oxford Press.

[2] Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia. (2015). Surat Edaran Kepala Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor: SE/6/X/2015 tentang Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech). Jakarta: Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.

[3] Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2016). Buku Saku Penanganan Ujaran Kebencian (Hate Speech.). Jakarta: Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia.

[4] Levinson, S. C. (2014). Pragmatics. Cambridge: University Press

[5] Neshkovska, S. and Trajkpva, Z. (2017). Essentials of Hate Speech. IJET Faculty of Education of Bitola. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press. Bulgaria.

[6] Putri, W. S. R., Nurwati, R. N. and Budiarti, M. (2016). Pengaruh Media Soaial Terhadap Perilaku Remaja. Prosiding KS: Riset dan PKM.

[7] Rangkuti, R., Pratama, A. and Zulfan Z. (2019). Hate Speech Acts: A Case in Batu Bara. Language Literacy: Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Language Teaching, vol. 3, issue 2. pp: 217-224, December 2019

[8] Rohmadi, M. (2004). Pragmatik: Teori dan Analisis. Yogyakarta: Lingkar Media.

[9] Sudaryanto, S (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan secara Linguistis. Yokyakarta: Sanata Dharma University Press.

[10] Wijaya, L., et al. (2018, April). Language as Art and Communication Tool. Presented at 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Islam Sumatera Utara. Indonesia, Medan: UISU Press.

[11] Wijaya, L., et al. (2014). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from https://plato.stanford.edu/ entries/speech-acts/#Aca.

[12] Data Reportal. (2019). Frequency of Internet Use. Indonesia Digital Report. Retrieved from https:// datareportal.com/reports/digital-2019-indonesia.