KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Social Condition Reflected in Samuel Beckett’s Waiting for Godot

Published date:Mar 11 2021

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Annual International Conference on Language and Literature

Pages:285-295

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v5i4.8688

Authors:

Fita Chyntiafcsapiens@gmail.comUniversitas Sumatera Utara (USU), Medan, Indonesia

Multhahada Ramadhani SiregarUniversitas Sumatera Utara (USU), Medan, Indonesia

Roni Hikmah RamadhanUniversitas Sumatera Utara (USU), Medan, Indonesia

Abstract:

This paper discusses the absurd character types that exist in Samuel Beckett’s play, Waiting for Godot. Vladimir, Estragon, Pozzo and Lucky are the four contradictory yet dependent characters in the play. The absurd characters reflect the social condition of the time, post – World War II. The characters are pictured waiting for the completion of the war in the hope that it will come. Their fate can be changed instantly, the same as the state of war. Besides discussing the characters in the drama, this paper also discusses the characteristics of the language used by the characters. The language used is unreasonable, not in accordance with what is said or how they act; it is called “verbal nonsense”. The interpretations of the dialogue among the characters in the play will give a better picture of each character and how they can be related to societal conditions.

Keywords: Theater of Absurd, Character Types, Post-War, Social Condition

References:

[1] Beckett, S. (1956). Waiting for Godot. London: Faber and Faber Limited.

[2] Esslin, M. (1961). The Theatre of the Absurd. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.

[3] Fisher, J. (1980). Beckett’s Waiting FOR Godot, Endgame and Other Plays. Nebraska: C. K. Hillrgass.

[4] Neuman, E. (2006). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Retrieved from http://letrunghieutvu.yolasite.com/resources/w-lawrence-neuman-social-research-methods_- qualitative-and-quantitative-approaches-pearson-education-limited-2013.pdf.

[5] Taylor, R. (1981). Understanding the Elements of Literature: Its Forms, Techniques and Cultural Conventions. New York: ST. Martin’s Press.

[6] Wellek, R. and Warren, A. (1971). Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt and Brace Inc.

[7] Wilson, E. (1976). The Theater Experience. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company

Cited by
?
DEVELOPING ENGLISH MATERIAL FOR SHARIA ECONOMY STUDY PROGRAM AT IAIN PALOPO
Dewi Furwana et al., LANGUAGE CIRCLE: JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE AND LITERATURE, 2023
EVALUATION OF AN ESP TEXTBOOK FOR THE STUDENTS OF FASHION DESIGN
Roslina Hasibuan et al., LANGUAGE LITERACY: JOURNAL OF LINGUISTICS, LITERATURE, AND LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2022
ARE WE PRESENTING VOCABULARY ITEMS PROPERLY? THE CASE OF THE CEFR-ALIGNED MALAYSIAN FORM 4 ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEXTBOOK
Nor Raihah Azaha et al., OPEN JOURNAL OF MODERN LINGUISTICS, 2024
Recommendations
GENDER SENSITIVITY AMONG POLITICAL PARTIES IN INDONESIA AND INDIA
V. S. D. Soedarwo et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2020
SPEECH ACT FOUND IN THE FAULT IN OUR STARS MOVIE
Ni Made Paras Asri et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2022
IMPLEMENTATION OF ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT TO SUPPORT WORLD-CLASS UNIVERSITY: A CASE STUDY IN AIRLANGGA UNIVERSITY
O. D. P. Srirahayu, KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2018
THE DETERMINANT FACTORS OF EMPLOYEES’ SUBJECTIVE WELLBEING
Nina Zulida Situmorang et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2021
THE IMPACT OF TEACHING CULTURE ONLINE IN INDONESIA DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC
Garcia Muhadjir et al., KNE SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2022
Powered by
Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

15914 Abstract Views

893 PDF Downloads