Published date: Nov 11 2020

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Humanities, Education and Social Sciences (IC-HEDS) 2019

Pages: 10–20

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v4i14.7854

Riyawati Ika Dewiriyawati.ikadewi@gmail.com1Environmental Management Program, State University of Jakarta

Ahman SyaLecture of Environmental Management Program, State University of Jakarta

Diana VivantiLecture of Environmental Management Program, State University of Jakarta

With huge pressures from a rapidly growing population, Jakarta suffers from an increasingly low Environmental Quality Index (IKLH). In 2016 and 2017 it was the only province in Indonesia with the IKLH index “alert” according to the Ministry of Environmental and Forestry. Improving the quantity and quality of Green Open Space (GOS) is one way to counter this issue, and this initiative is undertaken by the DKI Jakarta Government to improve the quality of its environment. However, land limitations remain a challenge. The solution of the DKI Jakarta Government is to create multifunction GOS that combine various interests and facilities. The purpose of this study is to identify potential educational benefits from multifunction GOS, using qualitative analysis via literature study. The results suggest that the GOS provide economic, social and educational improvements. Most of the articles said that education through GOS is the second benefit that people can get. This study concludes that GOS can serve to improve environmental awareness in visitors, via indirect educational methods.

Keywords: Green Open Space, Multifunction Green Open Space, Environmental Education

[1] Indonesia’s Intergovernmental Transfer. (November 2011). Response on Future Demographic and Urbanization Shifts (Report No. 68455). Assistance Team on Fiscal Decentralization for the Minister of Finance, Republic of Indonesia.

[2] DKI Jakarta Province in figures. (2018). (Publication No. 31000.1701). Statistic of DKI Jakarta Province.

[3] Indonesia’s Environmental Quality Index. (2016). Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry.

[4] Indonesia’s Environmental Quality Index. (2017). Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Retrieved from http://www.menlhk.go.id/site/single_post/1551.

[5] Inkson, C. and Minnaert, L. (2012). Tourism Management. Sage Publication Asia-Pacific Pvt Ltd.

[6] Indonesia Policy Regulation No. 05/PRT/M/2008. (May, 2008). Guidelines for Provision and Utilization of Green Open Space in Urban Areas. Directorate General of Spatial Planning, Department of Public Works.

[7] Deputy Governor’s Explanation on Spatial and the Environment. (2017). Child Friendly Open Public Spaces/RPTRA, Concepts, Implementation and Learning. Government of DKI Jakarta Province. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/34279006.

[8] Margaretta, Y. (2018). Taman Maju Bersama City Concep 4.0, Wartakota.Tribunenews, April 9

[9] UNAS, MPR. (2016). Sozialitation Green Open Space and Biological Diverse of DKI Jakarta, Nasional University Portal Web. Retrieved from https://www.unas.ac.id/news/sosialisi-ruang-terbuka-hijau-dankeanekaragaman-hayati-dki-jakarta/.

[10] Dunn, W. (2003) Introduction to Public Policy Analysis. (2nd ed.). Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

[11] Joga, N. and Ismaun, I. (2011). Green Open Space 30 % Resolution (city) green (One). Jakarta, PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

[12] Ismail, K. E. (2014). Factors that Influences Design of Public Green Open Space in Residence Area. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/8779836/.

[13] Shi, W. (2014). Managing for Multifunctionality in Urban Open Space: Approches for Sustainable Development. Journal of Urban Management, vol. 3, pp. 3–21.

[14] Lestan, K., et al. (2014). The Role of Open Space in Urban Neighbourhoods for Health-Related Lifestyle. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol.11, pp. 6547 –6570.

[15] Wolsink, M. (2016). Environmental Education Excursions and Proximity to Urban Green Space – Densification in a “Compact City”. Journal of Environmental Education, vol. 22, pp. 1049–1071.

[16] Sinurat, J. (2017). Corelation of Green Open Space and PDRB Sistematic Modeling in Jakarta. Indonesian Journal of Environmental and Management, vol. 2, pp. 77–94.

[17] Herlina, N. and Nadiroh. (2018). Strategic Role of Child Friendly Integrated Public Spaces in the Context of Fulfilling Children’s Rights to the Environment. Journal of Journal of Early Childhood Education, vol. 12, pp. 104–117.

[18] Prakoso, S. and Dewi, J. (2017). Feeling of Childhood Concern at Child Friendly Integrated Public Space (RPTRA). Journal of Architecture, vol. 17, pp. 1–10.

[19] Yuniastuti, H. (2019). Child Friendly Green Open Space to Enchance Education Process for Children. Presented at IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science. IOP Publishing.

[20] Arlinkasari, F. (2019). “Forget Your Gadget, Let’s Play Outside!’ (https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/334655710)

[21] Browning, M. and Rigolon, A. (2019). School Green Space and its Impact on Academic Performance: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 16, pp. 1-22.