KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Graduate Students’ Attitude Toward Plagiarism in Academic Writing

Published date: Feb 19 2020

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture

Pages:

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v4i4.6484

Authors:

Najmi Rodhiyanazmirodhiya11@gmail.com Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang

Primardiana Hermilia WijayatiUniversitas Negeri Malang, Malang

Abstract:

Plagiarism is one of academic dishonesty that becomes a central issue and challenge faced by the educational sector. Students who study in a higher level of education will face many kinds of academic writing, which is not easy to deal with. Moreover, students need to find information related to their writing to support theories and arguments for their academic writing. This study aims to find out graduate language students’ attitude toward plagiarism in academic writing. This present study used a quantitative approach and survey as the design of the study. The target population was all of the graduate students in language study program in the second semester from four departments; English Language Teaching, Indonesian Language Teaching, Arabic Language Teaching, and Keguruan Bahasa department. 86 students were chosen as a sample using random sampling. Questionnaire and interview were used as the instruments in this study. The questionnaire was divided into three parts; cognitive, emotional and behavior. The result shows that 66% or 57 students have a neutral attitude toward plagiarism. It means that they knew that plagiarism was an improper action, but they can tolerate plagiarism action. However, 33% or 28 students have a negative attitude toward plagiarism which means that they cannot tolerate plagiarism action. In contrast, only 1% or 1 student has a positive attitude toward plagiarism which means that they do not think that plagiarism is an improper action.

Keywords: Attitude, Plagiarism, Academic Writing

References:

[1] Aina, Q. &, & Wijayati, P. H. (2018). Coping the Academic Stress: The Way the Students Dealing with Stress. In International Seminar on Langugae, Education and Culture, Malang 1-2 September. (pp. 212–223). KnE Publishing. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i10.3903

[2] Ajzen, I. (1988). Attitudes, Personality and Behaviour. Milton Keynes: Open University.

[3] Bilić-Zulle, L., Ažman, J., Frković, V., & Petrovečki, M. (2008). Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing? Sci Eng Ethics, 14(1), 39–47.

[4] Cahyono, B. Y. (2005). Australian and Indonesian Students Attitudes toward Plagiarim. University of Melbourne.

[5] Ehrich, J. Steven H., James. T, & S. (2015). Measuring attitudes toward plagiarism: issues and psychometric solutions. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 7 (2), 243–257. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-02-2014-0013

[6] Gallant, T. B. (2011). Building a Culture of Academic Integrity. USA: Magna Publication White Paper.

[7] Green, P.. (2002). Naturalistic Inquiry: A method for Transforming Curiosity into Active Inquiry. In P.G. Green 9Ed.), Slices of life: Qulaitatuve Research Snapshots. Melbourne: RMIT.

[8] Hogg, N & vaughan, G. (2005). Social Psychology (Fourth Edi). London,: Prentice-Hall.

[9] Hu, G., & Lei, J. (2012). Investigating Chinese University Students’ Knowledge of and Attitudes toward Plagiarism from an Integrated Perspective. Language Learning, 62, 813–850.

[10] Jones, K. O., Reid, J., & Bartlett, R. (2008). Cyber Cheating in an Information Technology Age. Digithum., 10, 19–29. Retrieved from http://www.uoc.edu/digithum/10/dt/eng/jones_reid_bartlett.pdf

[11] Jordan, A. E. (2001). College student cheating: The role of motivation, perceived norms, attitudes and knowledge of institutional policy. Ethics and Behavior, 11(2), 33–47.

[12] Lambert, E., Hogan, N., & Barton, S. (2003). Collegiate Academic Dishonesty Revisited: What have they done, how often they done it, who does it, and why did they do it? Electronic Journal of Sociology, 7(4).

[13] Longman Advanced American Dictionary. (2007) (Second Edi). USA: Pearson Education Limited.

[14] Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovečki, M. (2010). Construction and Validation of Attitudes toward Plagiarism Questionnaire. Croatian Medical Journal, 51(3), 195–201.

[15] Mu, C. (2010). “I only Cited some of his Words”: The Dilemma of EFL Students and Their Perceptions of Plagiarism in Academic Writing. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 7(4), 103−132. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285993175_I_only_cited_some_of_his_words_The_d ilemma_of_EFL_students_and_their_perceptions_of_plagiarism_in_academic_writing

[16] Permana, I. G. Y., & Santosa, M. H. (2018). ELF Students Perception about Plagiarism. In Language in the Online and Offline World 6: The Fortitude (pp. 128–133).

[17] Pupovac, V., Bilic-Zulle, L., Mavrinac, M., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Attitudes toward Plagiarism among Pharmacy and Medical Biochemistry Students Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 307–313.

[18] Teeter, J. (2015). Deconstructing attitudes towards plagiarism of Japanese undergraduates in EFL academic writing classes. English Language Teaching, 8(1), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt. v8n1p95.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

3326 Abstract Views

1482 PDF Downloads