Published date: Feb 19 2020

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture

Pages:

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v4i4.6482

Muhammad Isa .

This survey study was carried out to unveil 397 Indonesian EFL teachers’ beliefs on classroom management. They were recruited by means of convenience sampling technique. As a platform, online survey was used. Two subscales, Instructional Management (IM) and People Management (PM), in the questionnaire were of used. The findings indicated that most of the respondents agreed to include IM as a crucial factor in classroom management followed by PM. Their beliefs were also predictable based on teacher category, teaching institution, and working status. While, gender could not significantly predict the beliefs. This study yielded recommendation for classroom teachers and policymakers.

Keywords: Beliefs, classroom management, instructional management, people management.

[1] Aliakbari, M., & Heidarzadi, M. (2015). The Relationship between EFL Teachers’ Beliefs and Actual Practices of Classroom Management. Cogent Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2015. 1039255

[2] Baldwin, B. (1994). Beliefs Regarding Classroom Management Style: Differences Between Novice and Experienced Teachers. The Annual Conference of the Southwest Educational Research Association, 1–14. San Antonio, Texas.

[3] Baldwin, B., & Loui, S. (1993). Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. 15.

[4] Caner, H. A., & Tertemiz, N. (Isık). (2015). Beliefs, Attitudes and Classroom Management: A Study on Prospective Teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 186, 155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sbspro.2015.04.098

[5] DeLong, M., & Winter, D. (1998). Addressing Difficulties with Student-Centered Instruction. PRIMUS, 8(4), 340–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511979808965909

[6] Halim, S. (2015). Teacher ’s Strategies Towards Students’ Disruptive Behavior in Learning English. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 3 No. 1, 9.

[7] Kazemi, A., & Soleimani, N. (2016). On the relationship between EFL teachers’ classroom management approaches and the dominant teaching style: A mixed method study. 17.

[8] Konig, J. (2015). Measuring classroom management expertise (CME) of teachers: A video-based assessment approach and statistical results. Cogent Education, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X. 2014.991178

[9] Koutrouba, K., Markarian, D.-A., & Sardianou, E. (2018). Classroom Management Style: Greek Teachers’ Perceptions. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11440a

[10] Latz, M. (1992). Preservice teachers’ perceptions and concerns about classroom management and discipline: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 3(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF02614729

[11] Orgovanyi-Gajdos, J. (2016). Teachers’ professional development on problem solving: Theory and practice for teachers and teacher educators.

[12] Quek, C. L., Liu, C., Kang, S., Wang, Q., & Nonis, D. A. M. (2015). Validation of Attitudes and Beliefs on Classroom Control Inventory among Beginning Teachers in Singapore Schools. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(1), 157–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0168-8

[13] Ragawanti, D. T. (2015). Cultivating Pre-Service Teachers’ Classroom Management Skills Through Teaching Practicum: A Reflective Practice. TEFLIN Journal - A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 26(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v26i1/117-128

[14] Sadik, F., & Akbulut, T. (2015). An Evaluation of Classroom Management Skills of Teachers at High Schools (Sample from the City of Adana). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.539

[15] Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2017). See and tell: Differences between expert and novice teachers’ interpretations of problematic classroom management events. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.015