Published date:Jul 03 2019

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: UNNES International Conference on Research Innovation and Commercialization 2018

Pages:682–693

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i18.4758

Tri Joko Raharjotrijokoraharjo@mail.unnes.ac.idSemarang State University

Harianingsih .Wahid Hasyim University

The growth of the non-formal education sector in the last decade is indispensable as a form of social services provided by an organization to be a reference for marginalized people to be able to pursue education equivalent to formal education. Entrepreneurship-based learning is an important solution to help and supplement the non-formal education sector to successfully meet many of these challenges. One benefit that is seen in combining entrepreneurship learning systems into non-formal education is the development and improvement of the provided curriculum followed by the conversion of lessons learned into practices and operating principles that help individuals in the organization to maintain and improve their performance capabilities so as to produce graduates who are ready work. Non-formal education is seen as a sustainable resource for learning and improvement not only for individuals in the organizationbutalsoforpartnersandstakeholdersaffiliatedwithnon-formaleducation. Effective motivation and team dynamics are factors that influence learning to develop entrepreneurial capacities that are important for the innovation process taken on opportunities that help build and grow non-formal education. There are motivations and dynamics of effective program implementation teams, better strategies, policies, actions, decisions, resource allocations, and many more benefits that will all lead to theabilityofnon-formaleducationtogrowanddevelopandadaptefficientlytochange.

Keywords: entrepreneurship based learning, motivation, team dynamic

[1] Atkinson, R. and Flint, J. (2001). Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Social Research Update, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 1-4.


[2] Ashforth, B.E. and Saks, A.M. (2000). Personal control in organizations: a longitudinal investigation with newcomers. Human Relations, Vol. 53 No. 3, pp. 311-339.


[3] Bloom, M. and Colbert, A.E. (2011). An integration and extension of intrinsic motivation theories: the role of core affect. Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 30, pp. 73-114.


[4] Buckley, M.R., Fedor, D.B., Veres, J.G., Wiese, D.S. and Carraher, S.M. (1998). Investigating newcomer expectations and job-related outcomes, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83 No. 3,pp. 452-461.


[5] Castka, P., Sharp, J.M. and Bamber, C.J. (2003). Assessing teamwork development to improve organizational performance. Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 7 No. 4, pp. 29-36.


[6] Champoux, J.E. (1996). Organizational Behavior: Integrating Individuals, Groups, and Processes. West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN.


[7] Dugoni, B.L. and Ilgen, D.R. (1981). Realistic job previews and the adjustment of new employees. Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 3, pp. 579-591.


[8] Galletta, M., Portoghese, I. and Battistelli, A. (2011). Intrinsic motivation, job autonomy and turnover intention in the Italian healthcare: the mediating role of affective commitment. Journal of Management Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 1-19.


[9] Johnson, P.R., Heimann, V.L. and O’Neill, K. (2000). The wolf pack: team dynamics for the 21