KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Analysis of Utilization of Gadgets as Effective Learning Media in Innovation Education to improve Student Learning Achievement

Published date: Jun 30 2019

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Meaningful Education (ICMEd)

Pages: 460–467

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i17.4671

Authors:

Dewi Ratnasariharyanto@yahoo.co.idProgram Studi Manajemen Pendidikan PPs UNY, Yogyakarta State University

Haryanto HaryantoProgram Studi Manajemen Pendidikan PPs UNY, Yogyakarta State University

Abstract:

Innovation in the world of education requires that learning be more meaningful and quality. It also aims to direct according to the needs of the rolling and the beat of the times. Technological progress has become one of the main triggers that are innovations used in the world of education, one of which is using technology tools such as gadget. An educator using various technologies in the process of teaching and learning activities that are useful to enhance the effectiveness of teaching and learning in the classroom. Utilization of gadgets in learning at school plays an important role as a source of learning and support the process of learning to be comfortable, so that the creation of learning process that is effective and efficient to improve student learning outcomes. This study aims to examine the utilization of gadgets as effective learning media in innovation education to improve student learning achievements for students of Grade VIII students of Junior High Schools in Yogyakarta City.

 

Keywords: Education, Innovation, Android, Effective Learning.

References:

[1] Arifin. (2010). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.


[2] Brewer, D., & Tierney, W. (2012). “Barriers to innovation in the US education”, in Wildavsky, B., Kelly, A. and Carey, K. (Eds), Reinventing Higher Education: The Promise of Innovation, Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 11-40.


[3] Cronbach, J. (1996). Essentials of Psychological Testing, New York: Harper & Row Publisher.


[4] Evans, R., & Leppmann, P. (1970). Resistance to innovation in higher education, Jossey-Bass Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA.


[5] Osolind, K. (2012). “Revolutionary vs evolutionary innovation”, Reinvention Consulting, available at: www.reinventioninc.com/revolutionvsevolution (accessed October 16, 2016).


[6] Kingsley, H. (1957). The Nature and conditions of learning. NewJersey: Prentice Hall Ings Engliwood Clifts.


[7] Ling, R., & Helmersen, P. (2000). “It must be necessary, it has to cover a need”: The adoption of mobile teleph-ony among pre-adolescents and adolescents.” Presented at the conference on the social consequences of mobile telephony, 16 June 2000, Oslo Norway. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2827.8244.


[8] Palennari, M. (2011). Potensi strategi integrasi PBL dengan pembelajaran kooperatif jigsaw dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep mahapeserta didik. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, Biologi Edukasi, 3(2), 26-33.


[9] Pea, R., & Maldonado, H. (2006). WILD for learning: Interacting through new computing devices anytime anywhere. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.). Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.


[10] Roschelle, J. (2003). Unlocking the learning value of wireless mobile devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 260-72.


[11] Vavoula, et al,. (2007). Learning Bridges: A role for mobile technologies in education. Educational Technology, 47, 33-36.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

126999 Abstract Views

15078 PDF Downloads