KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

The Impact of Perceived Lottery Knowledge on Problem Lottery Playing: A Moderated Mediation Model

Published date: Nov 12 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation (ICOI-2018)

Pages:

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3491

Authors:
Abstract:

The study explored the mechanism of perceived lottery knowledge in predicting problem in lottery playing through a Moderated Mediation Model centering on overconfidence. A total of 972 Chinese football bettors from nine provinces completed a questionnaire survey. The result showed that: (1) perceived lottery knowledge could positively predict problem lottery playing; (2) perceived lottery knowledge influenced problem lottery playing directly and indirectly through overconfidence; (3) risk perception moderated the mediated path. The indirect effect was stronger for football bettors with low-risk perception than for those with high-risk perception. Implications of consumption and intervention for problem lottery players were discussed.

 

 

Keywords: football bettors, problem lottery playing, perceived lottery knowledge, overconfidence, risk perception

References:

[1] Hai Li, Hui Ma, Xiaofei Lou, Dongfeng Liu,& Shurui Chen. (2009). The Necessity and Feasibility of Issuing Guessing Type Horse Lottery in China. Journal of Shanghai Physical Education Institute. 33(2), 1-5.


[2] Hui Sang. (2011). The Influence of Perceived Knowledge and Customer Satisfaction on Customer Loyalty. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Science). 10(1), 84- 88.


[3] Haidong Xie. (2006). An Analysis of Company Mergers and Acquisitions Based on Overconfidence Theory. Modern finance and Economics: Journal of Tianjin University of Finance Economics, 26(10), 37-40.


[4] Zhonglin Wen. (2012). The Analysis of Moderating Effect and Mediating Effect. Educational Science Press.


[5] Xiaofei Xie, Tianling Hu, Jing Lin, & Xi Lu. (2013). Expectation Difference: the risk communication barrier in the crisis. Advances in Psychological Science. 21(5), 761- 774.


[6] Lin Zhang, Nanjun Zhu, Yi Liu, Wendong Liu, & Qin Liu. (2003). Consumer Composition and Consumption Characteristics of Football Lottery in Shanghai. Journal of Shanghai Institute of Physical Education. 27(4), 1-4.


[7] Hao Zhou, & Lirong Zhou. (2004). Statistical Test and Control Method of Common Method Bias. Advances in Psychological Science. 12(6), 942-950.


[8] Brucks, M. (1985). The effects of product class knowledge on information search behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12(1), 1-16.


[9] Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003). Consumer switching costs: a typology, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(2), 109-126.


[10] Canale, N., Vieno, A., Griffiths, M. D., Rubaltelli, E., & Santinello, M. (2015). How do impulsivity traits influence problem gambling through gambling motives? the role of perceived gambling risk/benefits. Psychol Addict Behav, 29(3), 813-823.


[11] Coie, J., Watt, N., & West, S., et al. (1993). The science of prevention. American Psychologist, 48, 1013–1022.


[12] Dearing, E., & Hamilton, L. C. (2006). V. contemporary advances and classic advice for analyzing mediating and moderating variables. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 71(3), 88–104.


[13] Dickson, L. M., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2002). The prevention of gambling problems in youth: a conceptual framework. Journal of Gambling Studies, 18(2), 97- 159.


[14] Dickson, L. M., Derevensky, J. L., & Gupta, R. (2004). Harm reduction for the prevention of youth gambling problems: lessons learned from adolescent high-risk behavior prevention programs. Journal of Adolescent Research, 19(2), 233-263.


[15] Dickson, L. M. (2005). Youth gambling problems: the identification of risk and protective factors.


[16] Ferris, J., Wynne, H. J. (2001). The Canadian Problem Gambling Index Final Report. Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse.


[17] Flynn, L. R., & Goldsmith, R. E. (1999). A short, reliable measure of subjective knowledge. Journal of Business Research, 46(1), 57-66.


[18] Hai, L., Mao, L. L., Zhang, J. J., Yin, W., Li, A., & Jing, C. (2012). Dimensions of problem gambling behavior associated with purchasing sports lottery. J Gambl Stud, 28(1), 47-68.


[19] Goodie, A. S. (2005). The role of perceived control and overconfidence in pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 21(4), 481-502.


[20] Gordon, R., Gurrieri, L., Chapman, M., Prentice, C., & Cotte, J. (2015). Broadening an understanding of problem gambling: the lifestyle consumption community of sports betting. Journal of Business Research, 68(10), 2164-2172.


[21] Jolls, C., & Sunstein, C. R. (2004). Debiasing through law. Journal of Legal Studies, 35(1), 199-241.


[22] Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.


[23] Khazaal, Y., Chatton, A., Billieux, J., Bizzini, L., Monney, G., & Fresard, E., et al. (2012). Effects of expertise on football betting. Substance Abuse Treatment Prevention & Policy, 7(1).


[24] Luthar, S. S., Cicchetti, D., & Becker, B. (2000). The construct of resilience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development, 71(3), 543-562.


[25] Mao, L. L., Zhang, J. J., & Connaughton, D. P. (2014). Sports gambling as consumption: evidence from demand for sports lottery. Sport Management Review, 18(3), 436- 447.


[26] Moore, D. A., & Small, D. A. (2007). Error and bias in comparative judgment: on being both better and worse than we think we are. J Pers Soc Psychol, 92(6), 972-989.


[27] Oei, T. P., & Goh, Z. (2015). Interactions between risk and protective factors on problem gambling in asia. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(2), 557-572.


[28] Robert Ladouceur, Isabelle Giroux, & Christian Jacques. (1998). Winning on the horses: how much strategy and knowledge are needed?. Journal of Psychology, 132(2), 133-142.


[29] Sharpe, L. (2002). A reformulated cognitive-behavioral model of problem gambling: a biopsychosocial perspective. Clinical Psychology Review, 22(1), 1-25.


[30] Shu, L., Zhou, K., Yue, S., Rao, L. L., Rui, Z., & Liang, Z. Y. (2010). Anticipated regret, risk perception, or both: which is most likely responsible for our intention to gamble?. Journal of gambling studies / co-sponsored by the National Council on Problem Gambling and Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, 26(1), 105.


[31] Spurrier, M., Blaszczynski, A., & Rhodes, P. (2015). Gambler risk perception: a mental model and grounded theory analysis. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 887-906.


[32] Weiss, S. M., & Loubier, S. L. (2010). Gambling habits of athletes and nonathletes classified as disordered gamblers. Journal of psychology, 144(6), 507-521.


[33] Welte, J. W., Barnes, G. M., Tidwell, M. C., & Hoffman, J. H. (2009). The association of form of gambling with problem gambling among American youth. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 23(1), 105-12.


[34] Wickwire, E. M., Whelan, J. P., West, R., Meyers, A., Mccausland, C., & Luellen, J. (2007). Perceived availability, risks, and benefits of gambling among college students. Journal of Gambling Studies, 23(4), 507-507.


[35] Zhou, K., Tang, H., Sun, Y., Huang, G. H., Rao, L. L., & Liang, Z. Y., et al. (2012). Belief in luck or in skill: which locks people into gambling?. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(3), 379-391.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

317 Abstract Views

239 PDF Downloads