KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Barrier on Strengthening Regional Innovation System (RIS) in Banten Province, Indonesia

Published date: Nov 12 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 2018 International Conference of Organizational Innovation (ICOI-2018)

Pages:

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3398

Authors:

M S Budiarto - budiarto.sofyan@gmail.com

D T Bachrudin

Abstract:

The objective of this study is to identify the inhibiting factors to determine the strengthening of Regional Innovation System in Banten Province. Research method used is a descriptive qualitative method guided with previous research on barrier determinant factors. The findings show that the barrier determinant index ranked from the highest to the lowest point are Structure barrier value = 4.1, Innovation of the environment = 3.8, supporting research and development = 3.5, Human resources = 3.6, and Infrastructure = 3.1. The structure barrier become the main determinant factor in implementing RIS, meaning that there is poor synergy between stakeholders, less commitments, and misleading perception to RIS. Innovative environment index equals to 4.8, indicating low innovation activity, absence of formed cooperative between all the participants of the innovation process, lack of interest on innovation and uncertainty of economic results, underestimation of partnership networks, absence of brand that would form a regional cluster, inability to gain benefits from the combination of cooperative. The Human resources index equals to 3.6, meaning that the leadership, human capacity, professionalism, and responsibility toward RIS become determinant factors in the level of strengthening of RIS. Infrastructure index equals to 3.1, which is the lowest barrier index meaning that basic facilities and poor social amenities show the existing physical modal and social culture support toward RIS. It was supposed to link the opportunities and strong value by minimizing the barrier determinants value to determine the success of strengthening the implementation of Regional Innovation System.

 

 

Keywords: barrier, Regional Innovation System, Banten Province

References:

[1] Anonim. (2017). Regional innovation system in rural areas and the role of SMEs. Vol. 6, no. June, pp. 215–223.


[2] Budiarto, M. S. (2015). Problem identification on local economic development. Jurnal Inovasi, vol. 12, no. 3, pp.170–177.


[3] Budiarto, M. S. and Isminingisih, S. (2018). Strenghtening regional innovation system toward local economic development (unpublished).


[4] Budiarto, M. S. and Listiani. (2017). Impact of Regional Innovation System (SIDa) Sabajuhut to Fulfillment of Economic Right. Proseding. Regional Research and Development Agency of East Java.


[5] Carstensen, M. B. and Ibsen, C. L. (2015). Barriers to and triggers of policy innovation and knowledge transfer in Denmark STYLE-WP4: Policy transfer and comparative frameworks. No. 613256, pp. 1–57. Retrieved from http://www.style-research.eu/ publications/working-papers%0Ahttp://www.style-research.eu/team/martin bcarstensen/%0Ahttp://www.style-research.eu/team/christian-lyhne-ibsen/


[6] Dibrov, A. (2015). Innovation resistance: The main factors and ways to overcome them. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 166, pp. 92–96. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042814066270


[7] Doloreux, D. (2004). Regional Innovation Systems: A critical review. Maastricht MERIT, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.ulb.ac.be/soco/asrdlf/ documents/RIS_Doloreux-Parto_000.pdf


[8] Isaksen, A. (2001). Building R Egional In Novation S Ystems: Is End Ogenou S Indus Trial Deve Lopmen T Possible in the Global Economy? Globalisation: A Challenge for Local Industrial Policy Regionalisation as an Aspect of Economic Globalisation. Vol. 1, pp. 101–120.


[9] Kotey, B. and Sorensen, A. (2014). Barriers to small business innovation in rural Australia. Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 405–430.


[10] Mikhaylova, A. A. and Mikhaylov, A. S. (2015). Antecedents and barriers to the formation of regional innovation system: Case study of the Kaliningrad Region. Modern Applied Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 178–187.


[11] Oktaviana, O., Widianty, Y., and Amar, A. (2014). Kajian Struktur Tata Kelola Sistem Inovasi Daerah (SIDa) Provinsi Banten. Jurnal Lingkar Widyaiswara, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–32. Retrieved from http://juliwi.com/m/edisi0101.html.


[12] Oliveira, L. S. de, Echeveste, M. E. S., Cortimiglia, M. N., et al. (2017). Analysis of Determinants for open innovation implementation in regional innovation systems. RAI Revista de Administração E Inovação, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 119–129. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1809203917300360


[13] Plotnikova, I, Korneva, O, and Ustuizhanina, A. (2015). Barriers to innovation in the implementation of the investment strategy: An empirical study. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 166, no. 369–377. Retrieved from http://linkinghub. elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042814066774


[14] Prest, M. K. (OECD). (2005). Regional Innovation Strategies and Foresight. (November)


[15] Zarrabi, F., Poursadegh, N., and Jafarvand, S. (2013). Alignment between Innovation Strategy and Out Comes. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 75, pp. 18–24. Retrieved from http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S1877042813005399

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

317 Abstract Views

214 PDF Downloads