KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

What’s Wrong with SISDALSKRIPSI? An Evaluation of the Thesis Control System at UNNES

Published date: Oct 22 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Economics, Business and Economic Education 2018 (ICE-BEES 2018)

Pages: 469–479

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3149

Authors:
Abstract:

This study aims to examine the implementation of thesis control system (SISDALSKRIPSI) at the Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Semarang (FE UNNES). The concept of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) is used to understand the factors that influence the students want to use SISDALSKRIPSI in FE UNNES. The research design is evaluative research. The population of the research is the students of the Department of Economic Education, FE UNNES who are preparing the thesis. Respondents in this study are also lecturers and supervisors at FE UNNES. The questionnaires and interviews were used to collect the data. Data analysis techniques used are multiple regression analysis and focus group discussion. The results showed that effort expectancy, performance expectancy, and social influence have positive and significant impact on intention to use SISDALSKRIPSI. Intension and facilitating condition also proved to have positive and significant effect on the actual use of SISDALSKRIPSI. Other results indicate that SISDALSKRIPSI still have to be improved. So it will be easier to use by lecturers and students.

 

 

Keywords: on time graduation; SISDALSKRIPSI; thesis control system; UTAUT

References:

[1] Al-Suqri, M. N. (2014). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease-of-use and faculty acceptance of electronic books. Library Review, 63(4/5), 276–294. http://doi.org/ 10.1108/LR-05-2013-0062


[2] Awwad, M. S., & Al-Majali, S. M. (2015). Electronic library services acceptance and use: An empirical validation of unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. The Electronic Library, 33(6), 1100–1120. http://doi.org/10.1108/EL-03-2014-0057


[3] Chang, C.-C. (2013). Library mobile applications in university libraries. Library Hi Tech, 31(3), 478–492. http://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2013-0024


[4] Hsiao, C.-H., & Tang, K.-Y. (2014). Explaining undergraduates’ behavior intention of e-textbook adoption; empirical assessment of five theoritical models. Library Hi Tech, 32(1), 139–163. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/LHT-09-2013-0126


[5] Hsu, C.-L., Lin, Y.-H., Chen, M.-C., Chang, K.-C., & Hsieh, A.-Y. (2017). Investigating the determinants of e-book adoption. Program, 51(1), 2–16. http://doi.org/10.1108/ PROG-04-2014-0022


[6] Isaias, P., Reis, F., Coutinho, C., & Lencastre, J. A. (2017). Empathic technologies for distance/mobile learning: An empirical research based on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT). Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 14(2), 159–180. http://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2017-0014


[7] Kardoyo, Nurkhin, A., & Arief, S. (2015). the Determinants of Student’s Intention To Use Mobile Learning. PEOPLE: International Journal of Social Sciences, Special Is, 102–117.


[8] Khan, A., Masrek, M. N., Mahmood, K., & Qutab, S. (2017). Factors influencing the adoption of digital reference services among the university librarians in Pakistan. The Electronic Library, 35(6), 1225–1246. http://doi.org/10.1108/EL-05-2016-0112


[9] Lwoga, E. T., & Questier, F. (2014). Faculty adoption and usage behaviour of open access scholarly communication in health science universities. New Library World, 115(3/4), 116–139. http://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-01-2014-0006


[10] Maldonado, U. P. T., Khan, G. F., Moon, J., & Rho, J. J. (2011). E-learning motivation and educational portal acceptance in developing countries. Online Information Review, 35(1), 66–85. http://doi.org/10.1108/14684521111113597


[11] Muhsin, Thomas, P., & Nurkhin, A. (2016). Intention to use E-Journal; A Unified Theory of Acceptance and use of Technology Perspective. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 6(4), 100–106. http://doi.org/10.9790/7388- 060404100106


[12] Pramusinto, H., Murniawaty, I., & Bowo, P. A. (2017). Evaluasi Program On Time Graduation Jurusan Pendidikan Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Semarang. Jurnal Promosi, 5(2), 27–33.


[13] Singeh, F. W., Abrizah, A., & Karim, N. H. A. (2013). Malaysian authors’ acceptance to self-archive in institutional repositories. The Electronic Library, 31(2), 188–207. http://doi.org/10.1108/02640471311312375


[14] Tarhini, A., Masa’deh, R., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: a structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 164–182. http://doi. org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0032


[15] Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. http://doi.org/10.2307/30036540


[16] Williams, M. D., Rana, N. P., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): a literature review. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 28(3), 443–488. http://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-09-2014- 0088


[17] Wong, K., Russo, S., & McDowall, J. (2012). Understanding early childhood student teachers’ acceptance and use of interactive whiteboard. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 30(1), 4–16. http://doi.org/10.1108/10650741311288788


[18] Yuvaraj, M. (2016). Adoption of technology in recruitment of library professionals and faculty members. The Bottom Line, 29(4), 241–250. http://doi.org/10.1108/BL03-2016 0016

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

193 Abstract Views

228 PDF Downloads