Published date: Oct 22 2018

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Economics, Business and Economic Education 2018 (ICE-BEES 2018)

Pages: 180–197

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v3i10.3128

S Rahayu

Kusmuriyanto .

Kiswanto .kiswanto@mail.unnes.ac.id

D Indra Gunawan

The purpose of this research is to determine the effect of the leverage, litigation risk, financial distress, political cost and company growth on accounting conservatism. The population of this study are 144 manufacturing companies which is listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange (BEI) for the periode 2013-2016. Data were selected by purposive sampling method obtained by 32 sample. The units of analysis sample are 128 unit analysis. The method of data collection is documentation in this research. Data sourced from Indonesian Capital Market Directory and Audit Financial Report. The method of data analysis is multiple regression analysis, using SPSS 21 program for windows. The result of shows leverage, litigation risk, financial distress and company growth have positive significant effect to accounting conservatism. While political cost does not effect on accounting conservatism. Based on the research result, it can be concluded that leverage, litgation risk, financial distress and company growth can improve the application of accounting conservatism within the company, while and political costs have no effect the accounting conservatisme in company.

Keywords: Accounting Conservatism; Leverage; Litigation Risk; Financial Distress; Political Cost; Company Growth

[1] Adhidewanto, S., & Yuyetta, E. N. A. (2013). Pengaruh Risiko Litigasi dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Keberadaan Ahli Akuntansi Dalam Komite Audit. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 2(3), 1–12.


[2] Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting Conservatism and Board of Director Characteristics: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics. Retrieved from wwww.ssrn.com


[3] Alfian, A., & Sabeni, A. (2013). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Pemilihan Konservatisme Akuntansi. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 2(3), 1–10.


[4] Andreas, H. H., Ardeni, A., & Nugroho, P. I. (2017). Konservatisme Akuntansi DI Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 20(1), 1–22.


[5] Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal. Siaran Pers. Jakarta. 27 Desember 2002


[6] Beaver, W.H., Ryan, S.G., 2000. Biases and lags in book value and their effects on the ability of the book-tomarket ratio to predict book return on equity. Journal of Accounting Research 38, 127–148.


[7] Deslatu, S., & Susanto, Y. K. (2009). Pengaruh Kempemilikan Manajerial, Debt Covenant, Litigation, Tax and Political Cost Dan Kesempatan Bertumbuh Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. In Ekuitas (pp. 137–151).


[8] Dewi, L. P. K. D., Herawati, T. N., & Sinarwati, K. N. (2014). Faktor-Faktor Yang berpengaruh Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI. E-Journal S1 Ak Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Jurusan Akuntansi Program S1, 2(1).


[9] Hellman, N. (2008). Accounting Conservatism under IFRS. Accounting In Europe, 5(2), 71–100.


[10] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior , Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305– 360.


[11] Kasmir.2014.Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta : PT. Raja Grafindo Persada


[12] Nasir, A., Ilham, E., & Yuniati. (2014). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Manajerial, Risiko Litigasi, Likuiditas, Dan Political Cost Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. JURNAL EKONOMI, 22(2), 93–109.


[13] Noviantari, N. W., & Ratnadi, N. M. D. (2015). Pengaruh Financial Distress, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Leverage Pada Konservatisme Akuntansi. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 11(3), 646–660.


[14] Nugroho, D. A., & Mutmainah, S. (2012). Pengaruh Struktur Kepemilikan Manajerial, Debt Covenant, Tingkat Kesulitan Keuangan Perusahaan Dan Risiko Litigasi Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Diponegoro Journal Of Accounting, 1(1), 1–13.


[15] Oktomegah, C. (2012). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penerapan Konservatisme Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur di BEI. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(1), 36–42.


[16] Pramudita, N. (2012). Pengaruh Tingkat Kesulitan Keuangan dan Tingkat Hutang Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur Di BEI. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi, 1(2), 1–6.


[17] Pratiwi, I. (2015). Analisis Pengaruh Sensitivitas Politik Terhadap Biaya Politik. Skripsi. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.


[18] Rahma, T. A., & Muzdalifah, N. (2014). Tugas Etika Profesi Akuntansi Revisi Kasus Weste Managemnt Inc. dan PT. Great River Internasional.Tbk. Jakarta.


[19] Ramadhoni, Y., Zirman, & Mudrika. (2014). Pengaruh Tingkat Kesulitan Keuangan Perusahaan, Risiko Litigasi, Struktur Kepemilikan Manajerial dan Debt Convenant Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. JOM Fekon, 1(2), 1–20.


[20] Reskino, & Vemiliyarni, R. (2014). Pengaruh Konvergensi UFR, Bonus Plan, Debt Covenant, dan Political Cost Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi, VII(3), 185–195.


[21] Risdiyani, F., & Kusmuriyanto. (2015). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Penerapan Konservatisme Akuntansi. Accounting Analysis Journal, 4(3), 1–10.


[22] Saputri, Y. Di. (2013). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengararuhi Pilihan Perusahaan Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Accouting Analysis Journal, 2(2), 191.


[23] Setyaningsih, H. (2008). Pengaruh Tingkat Kesulitan Keuangan Perusahaan Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Investasi, 9(1), 91–107.


[24] Sulastiningsih, & Husna, J. A. (2017). Pengaruh Debt Covenant, Bonus Plan, Political Cost dan Risiko Litigasi Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur. Jurnal Kajian Bisnis, 25(1), 110–125.


[25] Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism In Accounting Part I: Explanetions and Implication. Retrieved from www.srsn.com


[26] Widayati, E. (2011). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pilihan Perusahaan Terhadap Konservatisme Akuntansi.Skripsi. Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.