KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Assessing the Effectiveness of Fiscal Incentives in Promoting Green Investments: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) Approach

Published date:Feb 19 2025

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference on Economic and Sustainable Development (ICESIDE)

Pages:196 - 210

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v10i5.18114

Authors:

Nurul Isnayni Nikmatul Makhfudhahisnayninurul532@gmail.comDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Trunojoyo Madura

Mohtar RasyidDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Economic and Business, University of Trunojoyo Madura

Abstract:

This paper aims to evaluate the effectiveness of fiscal incentives in promoting green investments, focusing on their economic and environmental impacts. Using a Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) approach, this study assesses how different forms of fiscal support, including tax credits, subsidies, and accelerated depreciation, influence the efficiency of green investments across multiple sectors. Data is sourced from a global database of green projects with a focus on renewable energy, energy efficiency, and carbon reduction initiatives. The results suggest that fiscal incentives play a significant role in improving the adoption of sustainable technologies but also highlight inefficiencies in the allocation of these incentives. Recommendations for improving policy design and implementation are discussed, based on findings related to the cost-effectiveness and performance of current green investment strategies.

Keywords: fiscal incentives, green investment, stochastic frontier analysis, renewable energy, sustainability

References:

[1] Geels FW, Sovacool BK, Schwanen T, Sorrell S. Sociotechnical transitions for deep decarbonization. Science. 2017 Sep;357(6357):1242–4.

[2] Bolinger M, Wiser R, Darghouth N, Seel J. The impact of tax credits on the deployment of solar PV in the U.S. Energy Policy. 2019;128:140–53.

[3] Johnstone N, Haščič I, Popp D. Renewable energy policies and technological innovation: evidence based on patent counts. Environ Resour Econ. 2010;45(1):133–55.

[4] Sartor O, Berghmans N. Carbon pricing in the power sector in China: evaluation of pilot carbon markets and prospects for a national market. Energy Policy. 2017;107:198–208.

[5] Marques AC, Fuinhas JA. Is renewable energy effective in promoting growth? Energy Policy. 2012;46:434–42.

[6] Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy. 2007;35(5):2683–91.

[7] Liu C, Wang Y, Liu W. Can green financial development promote renewable energy investment efficiency? Energy Policy. 2019;135:110994.

[8] Stucki T. Which firms benefit from investments in green energy? The role of innovation and firm size. Energy Econ. 2019;83:144–56.

[9] Zhou P, Ang BW, Han JY. Total factor carbon emissions performance: A stochastic frontier analysis. Energy Econ. 2019;78:478–88.

[10] Del Rio P. The interaction between emissions trading and renewable electricity support schemes: an overview of the literature. Mitig Adapt Strategies Glob Change. 2007;12(8):1363–90.

[11] Fischer C, Newell RG. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J Environ Econ Manage. 2008;55(2):142–62.

[12] Haščič I, Johnstone N. Innovation in green technologies: an empirical analysis of patent data. OECD J Econ Stud. 2011;2011(1):1–23.

[13] Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D. The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev. 2012 Feb;102(1):131–66.

[14] Jones P, Hillier D. Green bonds and global climate action: A review of the empirical literature. J Sustain Finance Invest. 2020;10(1):1–14.

[15] Wang S, Li Q, Fang C, Zhou C. The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jan;542 Pt A:360–71.

[16] Van der Gaast W, Begg K, Flamos A. Promoting sustainable energy technology transfers to developing countries through the CDM. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2009;13(2):445–53.

[17] Haščič I, Johnstone N, Watson F. Environmental policy and technological innovation in renewable energy. Energy Policy. 2015;76:195–202.

[18] International Energy Agency (IEA). World Energy Investment Report 2023. Available at: https://www.iea.org

[19] Bloomberg NE. Energy Transition Investment Trends 2023. Available at: https://about.bnef.com

[20] REN21. Renewables 2023 Global Status Report. Available at: https://www.ren21.net

[21] Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC). Global Wind Report 2023. Available at: https://gwec.net

[22] Climate Bonds Initiative. Green Bond Market Summary 2022. Available at: https://www.climatebonds.net

[23] European Commission. Green Finance in the European Union. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu

[24] Refinitiv. Sustainable Finance Review 2022. Available at: https://www.refinitiv.com

[25] International Energy Agency (IEA). Energy Efficiency 2023 Report. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-efficiency-2023

[26] International Energy Agency (IEA). Global EV Outlook 2023. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2023

[27] International Energy Agency (IEA). CCUS in Clean Energy Transitions. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/ccus-in-clean-energy-transitions

[28] European Investment Bank (EIB). Investment Report 2022/2023: Europe’s Climate Investment. Available at: https://www.eib.org

[29] European Commission. The European Green Deal Investment Plan. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/green-deal

[30] Portal CE. China’s Renewable Energy Investments. Available at: https://chinaenergyportal.org

[31] Climate Bonds Initiative. China’s Green Bond Market 2022. Available at: https://www.climatebonds.net

[32] U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). 2023 U.S. Energy & Climate Outlook. Available at: https://www.energy.gov

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

2 Abstract Views

9 PDF Downloads