Published date: Nov 11 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 8th International Seminar on Education 2024 (8th Isedu)

Pages: 529–539

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i31.17613

Patrisius RahabavEducation Administration, Faculty of Teacher Traning and Education, University of Pattimura, Ambon- Indonesia

Vando Kristi MakarukuEducation Administration, Faculty of Teacher Traning and Education, University of Pattimura, Ambon- Indonesia

This study describes the results and impact of the Sekolah Penggerak program at Kolese Xaverius Ambon High School. The focus of the research is four dimensions, including: Sekolah Penggerak program preparation, Sekolah Penggerak program planning, Sekolah Penggerak program implementation as well as results and Sekolah Penggerak program impacts. This research uses a descriptive-analytical approach used to describe in depth research problems to describe descriptively the phenomena that occur in the field. The participants this research were the school principal and deputy head of curriculum. The data collection techniques used were assessment rubrics, observation, free interviews and documentation studies. Data analysis was carried out descriptively (quantitative and qualitative). The results of data analysis in all dimensions obtained the results: 100%+92%+72%+87.5=351.5%/4= 88%. These results are in the category: (75% < The results of the analysis of dimension 1: Driving School Preparation obtained 100% results. These results are in the category (75% < X ≤ 100% = 4) meaning very good. Results of data analysis on dimension 2: Sekolah Penggerak program Arrangement, obtained a result of 92%. These results are in the category (75% < X ≤ 100% = 4) meaning very good. Results of analysis of dimension 3: Sekolah Penggerak program implementation the drive obtained a yield of 72%. These results are in the category (50% < X ≤ 75% = 3) which means good. Results of data analysis on dimension 4: Sekolah Penggerak program results and impact a result of 87.5% was obtained. These results are in the category (75% < X ≤ 100% = 4) meaning very good. The results obtained include: the school principal has become a role model by implementing team leadership, understanding assessment, learning tools, innovative learning models and information technology this has implemented differentiated learning, both content, process and product differentiation. There has been an increase in literacy, numeracy, character and school reports. Perceived impact: Energy used for partner schools, one student Kolese Xavier Ambon High School passing the selection and getting a scholarship to study in the United States, enthusiasm for entering high school, the trend of students graduating and entering their favorite college.

Keywords: analysis, Sekolah Penggerak Program, leadership, assessment, school principal

[1] Undang-Undang Pendidikan No. 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sintem Pendidikan Nasional.

[2] Dewey J. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada; 2003.

[3] Hamalik O. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2001.

[4] Budiman A, Samani M, Rusijono R, Setyawan WH, Nurdyansyah N. The Development of Direct-Contextual Learning: A New Model on Higher Education. Int J High Educ. 2021;10(2):15–26. Available from: https://doi.org/doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n2p15

[5] Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi (Permendikbudristek) Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 Tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2020-2024.

[6] Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi (Permendikbudristek) Nomor 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 22 Tahun 2020 Tentang Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Tahun 2020-2024.

[7] Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 tentang Guru dan Dosen.

[8] World Bank. Perkembangan Triwulanan Perekonomian Indonesia: Membawa Perubahan. World Bank; 2014.

[9] de Ree J, Muralidharan K, Pradhan M, Rogers H. Double for Nothing? Experimental Evidence on an Unconditional Teacher Salary Increase in Indonesia. World Bank Group. Desember; 2017.

[10] OECD. (2019), PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en.

[11] Pendidikan PP. Pendidikan di Indonesia: Belajar dari PISA 2018. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Balitbang Kemendikbud; 2018.

[12] Pendidikan PP. Pendidikan di Indonesia: Belajar dari PISA 2018. Jakarta: Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan, Balitbang Kemendikbud; 2018.

[13] Zamjani I. Naska Akademik Program Sekolah Penggerak. Pusat Penelitian Kebijakan Badan Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Dan Perbukuan Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan; 2020.

[14]

[14] Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: PT Alfabet.

[15] Kemdikbud, (2021).Program Sekolah Penggerak merupakan penyempurnaan program transformasi sekolah sebelumnya (kemdikbud.go.id) diakses Tanggal 20 Desember 2023.

[16] Kemendikbud.2021. Kemendikbud Luncurkan Program Sekolah Penggerak. Diakses Pada Tanggal 20 Desember 2023. Http://Ditpsd.Kemendikbud.go.id

[17] Harahap E. 2016. Visi Kepala Sekolah Sebagai Penggerak Mutu Pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan dan Supervisi Pendidikan. Vol. 1. No. 2. (https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/JMKSP/article/view/1014 diakses pada tanggal 20 Desember 2023).

[18] Zamjani, dkk. (2020). Naskah Akademik Program Sekolah Penggerak. Diakses pada 21 Desember 2023, dari https://penggerak-simpkb.s3.com

[19] Sibagariang D, Sihotang H, Murniarti E. 2021. Peran Guru Penggerak Dalam Pendidikan Merdeka Belajar Di Indonesia. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan. Vol. 14. No. 2. (http://ejournal.fkipuki.org/index.php/jdp/article/view/53 diakses pada tanggal 21 Desember 2023).

[20] Kemendikbud.2021. Kemendikbud Luncurkan Program Sekolah Penggerak. Diakses Pada Tanggal 20 Desember 2023. Http://Ditpsd.Kemendikbud.go.id