Published date: Nov 08 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference of Psychology 2024 (ICoPsy 2024)

Pages: 75–87

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i30.17507

Kennissa Ayu Kautsarinakennissa.ayu.1908116@students.um.ac.idFaculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang

Farah Farida TantianiFaculty of Psychology, Universitas Negeri Malang, Malang

One of the negative impacts of increasing internet use in online lectures is cyberloafing. Cyberloafing is the behavior of using the internet for nonacademic purposes. The level of cyberloafing can be influenced by their self-confidence in their abilities in the academic field or what is known as academic self-efficacy. The aim of this research is to determine the relationship between academic self-efficacy and cyberloafing behavior among students in Malang City. This research is correlational quantitative research. The research subjects were taken by purposive sampling, a total of 405 students. Data collection instruments used The Five Factor Cyberloafing Scale with 29 of 30 items are valid and reliable (a = .991) and the Academic Self-Efficacy Scale with 27 items (a = .945). The results of hypothesis testing using Spearman Rank can be concluded that there is a negative and significant relationship between academic self-efficacy and cyberloafing in students (r(403) = -0.782 p<0.001). This shows that the higher the student’s academic self-efficacy score, the lower the cyberloafing behavior will be.

Keywords: academic self-efficacy, cyberloafing, college students

[1] Menpan RB. (2020). Implementation of official duties by working at home.Website. https://inspektorat.ekon.go.id/berita/196/

[2] Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). Implementation of Education Policy during the Emergency Period of the Spread of Corona Virus Disease (COVID-19) | JDIH Ministry of Education, Culture, Research and Technology. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/detail_peraturan?main=2163

[3] Kusumadewi RF, Yustiana S, Nasihah K. Fostering Student Independence During Online Learning as an Impact of Covid-19 in Elementary Schools [ JRPD]. Journal of Basic Education Research. 2020;1(1):7–13.

[4] Rondonuwu VW, Mewo YM, Wungow HI. Medical Education during the COVID- 19 Pandemic The Impact of Online Learning for Faculty of Medicine Students Class of 2017 Unsrat. Journal Of Biomedi. JBM. 2021;13(1):67–75.

[5] Wu J, Mei W, Ugrin JC. Student cyberloafing in and out of the classroom in China and the relationship with student performance. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2018 Mar;21(3):199–204.

[6] Robbins SP, Judge T. (2019). Organizational Behavior. Pearson. https://books.google. com/books/about/Organizational_Behavior.html?hl=id&id=yonBswEACAAJ.

[7] Yaşar S, Yurdugül H. The investigation of relation between cyberloafing activities and cyberloafing behaviors in higher education. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;83:600–4.

[8] Akbulut Y, Dursun Ö, Dönmez O, Human YŞ. (2016). In Search of A Measure to Investigate Cyberloafing in Educational Settings. Elsevier, 55(1), 616- 625. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756321530217X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.002.

[9] Lim VK, Chen DJ. Cyberloafing at the workplace: gain or drain on work? Behav Inf Technol. 2012;31(4):343–53.

[10] Adiba WZ, Kadiyono AL, Hanami Y. (2021). Cyberloafing, Good or Bad?: Exploratory Case Study of Employees During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Performance: Journal ofPersonnel, Financial, Operations, Marketing and Information Systems, 28(2), 52-61. http://jos.unsoed.ac.id/index.php/performance/article/view/4246

[11] Ohana M, Murtaza G, Haq I, Al-Shatti E, Chi Z. Why and When can CSR toward Employees Lead to Cyberloafing? The Role of Workplace Boredom and Moral Disengagement. J Bus Ethics. 2023;189(1):133–48.

[12] Varol F, Yildrim E. An Examination of Cyberloafing Behaviors in Classrooms from Students’ Perspectives. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry. 2018;9(1):26– 46.

[13] Prasad S, Lim VK, Chen DJ. (2010). Self-regulation, individual characteristics and cyberloafing. Pp. 1641-48 in PACIS 2010 - 14th Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems.

[14] Pratama MY, Satwika YW. The Relationship Between Self-Regulation and Cyberloafing Behavior in Psychology Students at Surabaya State University. Jpn Psychol Res. 2022;9(1):21–33. Available from: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/ character/article/view/44551

[15] Zajacova, A. Lynch, M, . S., & J, T. (2005). Espenshade Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Academic Success in

[16] Akhtar M. (2008). What’s self-efficacy: bandura’s 4 sources of efficacy beliefs. Positive. Psychology. http://positivepsychology.org.uk/self-efficacy-definition-bandurameaning

[17] Simaremare CO. Student Self-Efficacy in Completing Their Studies (Case Study on Economics Education Students). Journal of Student Self-Efficacy in Completing Their Studies. Case Study on Economics Education Students; 2018.

[18] Makaria EC, Rachman A, Rachmayanie R. Correlation of Self-Confidence and Academic Self-Efficacy of Guidance and Counseling Study Program Students Class of 2018 [Indonesian Counseling Journal]. JKI. 2019;5(1):1–5.

[19] Sugiyono S. Quantitative Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Alfabeta; 2017.

[20] Tugtekin U. Scrutinizing the Interactions between College Students’ Cyberloafing Levels, Reasons of Cyberloafing, and Academic Self-Efficacy by Path Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology. 2022;19(1):21–34.

[21] Diar Fatharani, Sugandi., & Safanah. (2023). The Relationship between Self-efficacy and Cyberloafing in Psychology Students at the University of Education Indonesia

[22] Sugiyono S. Statistics for Research. 23rd ed. Alfabeta; 2013.

[23] Syiem, I.S. &Synrem, E.S. (2018). Relationship between scientific aptitude and achievement in science subject of class IX students in ri bhoi district of meghalaya. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews, 5(3). ISSN 2348 -1269

[24] Achdiyat & Utomo. (2017). Visual-spatial intelligence, numerical ability and math learning achievement. Journal of Formative 7 (3), 243-245. ISSN: 2088-351X

[25] Baumeister RF, Gailliot M, DeWall CN, Oaten M. Self-regulation and personality: how interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1773–801.

[26] Huang C. Gender differences in academic self-efficacy: A meta-analysis. Eur J Psychol Educ. 2013;28(1):1–35.

[27] Arikunto, & Suharsimi. (2013). Research Procedures A Practical Approach. Rineka Cipta. Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman and Company. Retrieved by. https://connect.springerpub.com/content/sgrjcp/13/158

[28] Santrock JW. Educational Psychology. 2nd ed. Jakarta: Kencana; 2008.

[29] Knight RM. (2017). Academic cyberloafing: A study of perceptual and behavioral differences on in-class cyberloafing among undergraduate students. http://hdl.handle.net/10342/6133

[30] Anderson M, Jiang J. (2018). Teens Social Media & Technology. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2018/05/31/teens-socialmedia- technology-2018

[31] Krasnova H, Veltri NF, Eling N, Buxmann P. Why men and women continue to use social networking sites: the role of gender differences [Coll]. J Strateg Inf Syst. 2017;26(4):261–28.

[32] Lubis, Evawani Elyaa, 2014. Portrait of Social Media and Women. Parallela Journal. 1(2). Riau University. Pekanbaru.

[33] Sheldon P. Students Favorite: Facebook and Motives for its Use. Southern Mass Communication Journal Spring; 2008.