KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Investigating the Relationship Between Psychological Contract, Apprenticeship Participation, and Ethnic Papuan Turnover Intention

Published date: Oct 15 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 8th International Conference on Sustainability (8th ICoS): Sustainable Economics

Pages: 625–639

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i29.17286

Authors:

Habel Taime-Bogehabeltaime4@gmail.comUniversity of Merdeka Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Triatmanto SunardiUniversity of Merdeka Malang, Malang, Indonesia

Abstract:

The study’s overarching goal was to look at how ethnic Papuans’ intentions to leave their current positions relate to their involvement in apprenticeship programs, the psychological contract, and other similar concepts, at the Nemangkawi Mining Institute IPN. Methods from the relational and transactional psychological contracts were used in this study. Through the privatized institution in the Mimika area and other contracting organizations, 110 persons took part in the apprenticeship program. We used the following tools for our measurements: the apprenticeship participation rate, the turnover intention scale, and psychological contracts. The multiple regression analysis yielded an F-value of 25.273, indicating statistical significance at the p<0.01 level. This data lends credence to the study premise that apprenticeship involvement and psychological contracts significantly impacts turnover intention. In forecasting desire to leave, psychological contracts and apprenticeship participation account for 39.9% of the total contribution value.

Keywords: Papua ethnicity, intention turnover, apprenticeship participation, psychological contract, contractor workers

References:

[1] Efendi F, Chen CM, Kurniati AN, Yusuf A. The situational analysis of nursing education and workforce in Indonesia. Malays J Nutr. 2018;9(4).

[2] Watson T. Global Talent Management and Reward Study 2012- 2013. 2012.

[3] Cho Y, Lewis G. Turnover intention and turnover behavior: Implications for retaining federal employees. Rev Public Person Adm. 2011;:4–23.

[4] Knippenberg D, Van Schie E. Foci and correlates of organizational identification. J Occup Organ Psychol. 2010;:137–47.

[5] Zhang Y. A review of employee turnover influence factor and countermeasure. J Hum Resour Sustain Stud. 2018;:85–91.

[6] Affandi Y. Pengaruh Motivasi Alderfer Erg (Existence, Relatedness, Growth) Dan Kepemimpinan Yang Memberdayakan Terhadap Loyalitas Karyawan Gen Y; Studi Pada Pt Ni Kantor Pusat Jakarta. Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Unpublished Thesis, Faculty of Management, Universitas Gadjah Mada; 2015.

[7] Zhao H, Wayne S, Glibkowski B, Bravo J. The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Pers Psychol. 2007;60(3):647–80.

[8] Diefendorf J, Brown D, Kamin A, Lord R. Examining the roles of job involvement and work centrality in predicting organizational citizenship behaviors and job performance. J Organ Behav. 2002;23(1):93–108.

[9] Khan T. Job involvement as predictor of employee commitment: Evidence from Pakistan. Int J Bus Manage. 2011.

[10] Habir AD, Larasati A. Human resource management as competitive advantage in the new millennium. Int J Manpow. 1999;20(8):548–63.

[11] Davis K, Newstrom J. Human behavior at work: Organization behavior. New York, The US. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1989.

[12] Hui C, Lee C, Rousseau DM. Psychological contract and organizational citizenship behavior in China: Investigating generalizability and instrumentality. J Appl Psychol. 2004 Apr;89(2):311–21.

[13] Kanungo R. Measurement of job and work involvement. J Appl Psychol. 1982;67(3):341–9.

[14] Azwar S. Asumsi-asumsi dalam inferensi statistika. Buletin Psikologi. 2000;9(1).

[15] Solberg E, Lapointe É, Dysvik A. You care about me, but can I count on you? Applying a psychological contract perspective to investigate what makes employees willing to be internally employable. Int J Hum Resour Manage. 2020 May;31(9):1157–79.

[16] Maryati T, Kusumayuda A. Empirical study of job stress, turnover intention, and job involvement. In: The 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020-Accounting and Management (ICoSIAMS 2020). Atlantis Press; 2021. p. 50–7. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210121.008

[17] Estreder Y, Tomás I, Ramos J, Gracia FJ. It is hard to forget what comes around: timelagged effects of employers’ non-fulfillment of psychological contract. Hum Resour Dev Q. 2021 Sep;32(3):349–61.

[18] Chan S. The interplay between relational and transactional psychological contracts and burnout and engagement. Asia Pacific Management Review. 2021;26(1):30–8.

[19] Unger O, Szczesny A, Holderried M. Does performance pay increase productivity? Evidence from a medical typing unit. Manage Account Res. 2020;47:100649.

[20] Rojikinnor R, Gani AJ, Saleh C, Amin F. The role of compensation as a determinant of performance and employee work satisfaction: A study at the PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. 2023 Jan;39(4):943–56.

[21] Dabos GE, Rousseau DM. Mutuality and reciprocity in the psychological contracts of employees and employers. J Appl Psychol. 2004 Feb;89(1):52–72.

[22] Duggan J, Sherman U, Carbery R, McDonnell A. Algorithmic management and appwork in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Hum Resour Manage J. 2020 Jan;30(1):114–32.

[23] Tomprou M, Lee MK. Employment relationships in algorithmic management: A psychological contract perspective. Comput Human Behav. 2022;126:106997.

[24] Murray WC, Holmes MR. Impacts of employee empowerment and organizational commitment on workforce sustainability. Vol. 13. Sustainability (Basel). 2021;13(6):3163.

[25] Estreder Y, Rigotti T, Tomás I, Ramos J. Psychological contract and organizational justice: The role of normative contract. Employee Relat. 2020 Jan;42(1):17–34.

[26] S S. M M S. Influence of empowerment, psychological contract and employee engagement on voluntary turnover intentions. Int J Prod Perform Manag. 2021 Jan;70(2):325–49.

[27] Ahmad A, Shah FA, Memon MA, Kakakhel SJ, Mirza MZ. Mediating effect of job embeddedness between relational coordination and employees’ well-being: A reflective-formative approach. Curr Psychol. 2023;42(30):26259–74.

[28] Dhir S, Dutta T, Ghosh P. Linking employee loyalty with job satisfaction using PLS– SEM modelling. Person Rev. 2020 Jan;49(8):1695–711.

[29] Rao AN, Virick M. Counteracting the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure and career initiative: The role of mentoring and network barriers. European Journal of Training and Development. 2023 Jan;(ahead-of-print).

[30] Atkinson C. Trust and the psychological contract. Employee Relat. 2007;29(3):227– 46.

[31] Rasool SF, Wang M, Tang M, Saeed A, Iqbal J. How toxic workplace environment effects the employee engagement: The mediating role of organizational support and employee wellbeing. Vol. 18. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(5):2294.

[32] Blau G, Boal K. Using job involvement and organizational commitment interactively to predict turnover. J Manage. 1989;15(1):115–27.

[33] Yu M, Lee H. Impact of resilience and job involvement on turnover intention of new graduate nurses using structural equation modeling. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2018 Oct;15(4):351–62.

[34] Powers TE, Watt HM. Understanding why apprentices consider dropping out: Longitudinal prediction of apprentices’ workplace interest and anxiety. Empir Res Vocat Educ Train. 2021;13(1):9.

[35] Pagnoccolo J, Bertone S. The apprentice experience: The role of interpersonal attributes and people-related generic skills. Educ Train. 2021 Jan;63(2):313–27.

[36] Park J, Min H. (Kelly). Turnover intention in the hospitality industry: A meta-analysis. Int J Hospit Manag. 2020;90:102599.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

1 Abstract Views

12 PDF Downloads