Published date: Oct 10 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 8th International Conference on Sustainability (8th ICoS): Entrepreneurship and Creative Economics

Pages: 352–360

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i28.17225

Sri Indriyani S. Daisriindriyani_dai@ung.ac.idFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Anwar SanusiFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Edi SubiyantoroFaculty of Economics and Business, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

This research aims to analyze the impact of social protection programs on community welfare in the Tomini Bay area. The research used data from Statistics Indonesia (BPS) collected between 2018 and 2022. It employed the Fixed Effect Model (FEM) panel data. The results indicated that several social protection programs, such as Non-cash Food Assistance (Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai or BPNT) and Pension Funds, positively affected people’s welfare in the Tomini Bay area. Meanwhile, the Family Hope Program (Program Keluarga Harapan or PKH) did not appear to have a sufficient impact on people in the area. Therefore, the critical focus for improving welfare in the Tomini Bay area is improving the quality and quantity of the BPNT Programs and Pension Funds.

Keywords: social protection, non-cash food assistance (BPNT) program, pension funds, hope for families (PKH) program, welfare

[1] Banerjee AV, Duflo E. Poor economics: A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. Public Affairs; 2011.

[2] Hayashi M, Kataoka M, Akita T. Spatial dimensions of expenditure inequality and the role of education in Indonesia: An analysis of the 2008-2010 Susenas panel data. Crawford School Research Paper. 2012;(12–11).

[3] Karakara AA, Ortsin EA. Assessing the Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) program as a conditional income transfer: A search for a conceptual framework. Int J Soc Econ. 2022;49(4):546–61.

[4] Kotambunan L. Analisis Pengaruh Belanja Modal dan Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM) terhadap Kemiskinan di Provinsi Sulawesi Utara (Dalam Tahun 2005-2014). Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi. 2016;16(1).

[5] Habibullah H. Perlindungan Sosial Komprehensif di Indonesia. Sosio Informa: Kajian Permasalahan Sosial Dan Usaha Kesejahteraan Sosial. 2017;3(1). https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v3i1.492.

[6] Bakhshinyan E, Molinas L, Alderman H. Assessing poverty alleviation through social protection: School meals and family benefits in a middle-income country. Glob Food Secur. 2019;23:205–11.

[7] Kiendrebeogo Y, Assimaidou K, Tall A. Social protection for poverty reduction in times of crisis. J Policy Model. 2017;39(6):1163–83.

[8] Lowder SK, Bertini R, Croppenstedt A. Poverty, social protection and agriculture: Levels and trends in data. Glob Food Secur. 2017;15:94–107.

[9] Mussa EC, Otchere F, Vinci V, Reshad A, Palermo T, Team IE; ISNP Evaluation Team. Linking poverty-targeted social protection and community based health insurance in Ethiopia: Enrolment, linkages, and gaps. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;286:114312.

[10] Borga LG, D’ambrosio C. Social protection and multidimensional poverty: Lessons from Ethiopia, India and Peru. World Dev. 2021;147:105634.

[11] Retnaningsih H. Bantuan sosial bagi pekerja di tengah pandemi Covid-19: sebuah analisis terhadap kebijakan sosial pemerintah. Aspirasi. Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial. 2020;11(2):215–27.

[12] Afkar R. Joint evaluation of cash and in-kind transfer programs in Indonesia: What are the roles in food and nutrition security? 2015;

[13] Djamaluddin S. How to ease the burden of poor household?: The role of Raskin Program. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Indonesia; 2015.

[14] Pangaribowo EH. The impact of ‘Rice for the Poor’ on household consumption. 2012;

[15] Mustofa M, Sugiyanto C, Susamto AA. Analysis of the impact of the Raskin Program on food security for poor households in Indonesia. J Econ. 2023;19(1):127–40.

[16] Nasution LZ, Fuddin MK. Dana Pensiun Pendorong Kesejahteraan Pekerja Dan Penjaga Eksistensi Umkm Dalam Menghadapi Masyarakat Ekonomi Asia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan. 2015;13(2):178–98.

[17] Gujarati DN, Porter DC. Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill; 2009. [18] Widarjono A. Ekonometrika pengantar dan aplikasinya. Yogyakarta: Upp Stim Ykpn; 2013.

[19] Munandar Y. Income inequality and noncash food assistance program in Central Java Province. Eko-Regional: Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi Wilayah. 2021;16(2). https://doi.org/10.20884/1.erjpe.2021.16.2.1805.

[20] Sartiyah S, Suriani S. The determinant of household welfare beneficiaries of food social assistance. In: Proceedings Aceh Global Conference-Business, Economics, and Sustainable Development Trends. 2020. p. 55–62.

[21] Sitinjak W, Sihaloho AN. The handling of non-cash food assistance (BPNT) and its effects on food resistance to beneficiary families (KPM) in 2018-2019-case study: Siantar Sitalasari District, Pematangsiantar City, Indonesia. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 2019;

[22] Sinaga E, Lubis TA, Situmorang EA, Harahap AS. Dampak Program Perlindungan Sosial terhadap Kemiskinan di Sumatra Utara. Jurnal Manajemen Perbendaharaan. 2022;3(2):116–31.

[23] Laurentcia S, Yusran R. Evaluasi Program Bantuan Pangan Non Tunai dalam Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Kecamatan Nanggalo Kota Padang. Journal of Civic Education. 2021;4(1):7–17.

[24] Direktorat Jendral Anggaran Kementrian Keuangan. Kajian Program Keluarga Harapan. Jakarta: Direktorat Jendral Anggaran Kementrian Keuangan; 2015.