KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

The Influence of Situational Leadership on Organizational Performance Through Organizational Change in the Hospitality Industry in Southern Kalimantan

Published date: Oct 10 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 8th International Conference on Sustainability (8th ICoS): Entrepreneurship and Creative Economics

Pages: 170–183

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i28.17203

Authors:

Dewi Damayanti SaidUniversity of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Boge Triatmantoboge.triatmanto@unmer.ac.idUniversity of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Sunardi ‎ University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Abstract:

This study aims to investigate the influence of situational leadership, organizational change, and organizational performance in the hospitality industry. A quantitative method is used to analyse data from a total population of 222 three- and four-star hotel management professionals in South Kalimantan Province. The data collection method was a census, to ensure the adequacy of the unit of analysis. The data analysis technique uses SEM Amos to jointly analyze the influence of situational leadership and organizational change on performance. The results of this study were that empirically, leadership’s ability to give orders to hotel employees is the most decisive attitude in situational leadership, especially in terms of supervising its members in the settlement process. Moreover, readiness to change as a belief and attitude that must be carried out has the highest contribution value in organizational change. From an organizational performance organizational performance, at star hotels in South Kalimantan, the most decisive indicator is positive feedback from hotel guests regarding the product or service experience used. Organizational change is able to mediate the influence of situational leadership on organizational performance.

Keywords: situational leadership, organizational change, hotels performance

References:

[1] Kaasinen E, Schmalfuß F, Özturk C, Aromaa S, Boubekeur M, Heilala J, et al. Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions. Comput Ind Eng. 2020 Jan;139:105678.

[2] Werner JM, DeSimone RL, Werner JM, DeSimone RL. Human resource development. 2012.

[3] Kożusznik B. Deinfluentization and self‐monitoring as influence regulation tactics of Polish women and men managers. Women Manage Rev. 2006 Feb;21(2):131–42.

[4] Thompson G, Glasø L. Situational leadership theory: A test from a leader-follower congruence approach. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2018 Jun;39(5):574–91.

[5] Yeo RK. Get ready to shift: Situational positioning of leadership identity and influence. Organ Dyn. 2020 Apr;49(2):100688.

[6] Peus C, Braun S, Frey D. Situation-based measurement of the full range of leadership model—Development and validation of a situational judgment test. Leadersh Q. 2013 Oct;24(5):777–95.

[7] Triatmanto B, Wahyuni N, Respati H. Continual human resources empowerment through human capital and commitment for the organizational performance in hospitality industry. Qual Access Success. 2019;20(173):84–91.

[8] Stewart DE, Das V, Seibold M. Birth and empowerment: A qualitative study of the childbirth experience of Filipino migrant women in Brisbane, Australia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1998 Apr;10(2):64–9.

[9] Giokas AE, Antonakas NP. Culture changing: A development and empirical exploration in the Greek tax administration. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013 Feb;73:573–80.

[10] Holbeche LS. Organizational effectiveness and agility. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. 2018 Oct;5(4):302–13.

[11] Wahyuni N, Triatmanto B. The effect of the organizational change on company performance mediated by changes in management accounting practices. Accounting. 2020 Apr;6:581–8.

[12] Mazzanti M, Pini P, Tortia E. Organizational innovations, human resources and firm performance: The Emilia-Romagna food sector. J Socio-Economics. 2006 Feb;35(1):123–41.

[13] E. Ris, Mof, Ran, “Sudah 1 . 438 Karyawan Hotel Dirumahkan, Pengamat : Ekonomi Kalsel akan Cepat Bangkit,” Prokol, no. April, 2020.

[14] Hoffman RC, Shipper FM. Shared core values of high performing employee-owned enterprises. J Manag Spiritual Relig. 2018 Aug;15(4):285–304.

[15] Joiner TA, Sarah Yang Spencer X, Salmon S. The effectiveness of flexible manufacturing strategies: The mediating role of performance measurement systems. Int J Prod Perform Manag. 2009 Jan;58(2):119–35.

[16] Shah TA, Khattak MN, Zolin R, Shah SZ. Psychological empowerment and employee attitudinal outcomes: The pivotal role of psychological capital. Manag Res Rev. 2019 Jul;42(7):797–817.

[17] Leung M, Shan Y, Chan I, Dongyu C. Engineering, construction and architectural management article information. Eng Construct Architect Manag. 2011;18(3):312–28.

[18] Sisaye S. Process innovation and adaptive institutional change strategies in management control systems: Activity based costing as administrative innovation. Advances in Management Accounting. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; 2003 May 6. pp. 251–85.

[19] Minbaeva DB. Strategic HRM in building micro-foundations of organizational knowledge-based performance. Hum Resour Manage Rev. 2013 Dec;23(4):378–90.

[20] Robalo R. Explanations for the gap between management accounting rules and routines: An institutional approach: Explicaciones para la brecha entre las normas de contabilidad de gestión y las rutinas: un planteamiento institucional. Rev Contab. 2014 Jan;17(1):88–97.

[21] Ghena AT, Abub NZ, Sazalic KH, Belkhamzad Z. The effect of empowerment and teamwork on employee productivity. Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang. 2019;6(4):377–86.

[22] Kotter JP. Building strategic agility for a faster moving world. Harvard Business Review Press; 2014.

[23] Kasali R. Agility bukan singa yang mengembik: Transformasi dalam sunyi untuk meraih ketangkasan. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama; 2014.

[24] Alsharari NM. Multilevel institutional analysis of accounting change in public management. Int J Organ Anal. 2018 Mar;26(1):91–106.

[25] Vears DF, D’Abramo F. Health, wealth and behavioural change: An exploration of role responsibilities in the wake of epigenetics. J Community Genet. 2018 Apr;9(2):153– 67.

[26] Englund H, Gerdin J. Management accounting and the paradox of embedded agency: A framework for analyzing sources of structural change. Manage Account Res. 2018 Mar;38:1–1.

[27] Alsharari NM. Management accounting and organizational change: alternative perspectives. Int J Organ Anal. 2019 Sep;27(4):1124–47.

[28] Oakland JS, Tanner SJ. A new framework for managing change. TQM Mag. 2007 Oct;19(6):572–89.

[29] Thompson G, Vecchio RP. Situational leadership theory: A test of three versions. Leadersh Q. 2009 Oct;20(5):837–48.

[30] Mobarez AA. The effect of green human resource management on organization’s sustainable environmental performance’. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Basic and Applied Sciences. 2018.

[31] Zaccaro SJ, Green JP, Dubrow S, Kolze M. Leader individual differences, situational parameters, and leadership outcomes: A comprehensive review and integration. Leadersh Q. 2018 Feb;29(1):2–43.

[32] Banjar K. “Update, 14 Hotel di Kalsel Tutup Dirumahkan,” p. 2020, 2020.

[33] Sanusi A. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis. Jakarta: Salemba Empat; 2016.

[34] Kuncoro W, Wibowo G. The increase of organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) through islamic work ethics, affective commitment, and organizational identity. Int Bus Res. 2019 Jan;12(2):181–90.

[35] Silverthorne C. Situational leadership theory in Taiwan: A different culture perspective. Leadersh Organ Dev J. 2000 Mar;21(2):68–74.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

5 Abstract Views

11 PDF Downloads