Published date: Oct 02 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 4th International Conference in Social Science (4th ICONISS): Urban Innovation

Pages: 80–89

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i26.17071

Arif Firmantofirmasfiraku@gmail.comDepartment Ilmu Sosial, Pasca Sarjana, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Bonaventura NgarawulaDepartment Ilmu Sosial, Pasca Sarjana, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

Catur WahyudiDepartment Ilmu Sosial, Pasca Sarjana, University of Merdeka Malang, Malang

This research focuses on social interaction and farmer empowerment in Rubaru District, Sumenep, and its impact on agricultural productivity. Social interaction between farmers plays a crucial role in increasing agricultural productivity, while farmer empowerment is an important factor in increasing welfare. This study adopts the framework of symbolic interaction theory to understand the role of communication and interaction in agricultural development. Miles and Huberman’s research method was used, involving in-depth interviews, participant observation, and document content analysis with five informants. The research results show that positive social interactions between farmers contribute to increasing agricultural knowledge, skills, and innovation. Farmer empowerment involves providing knowledge, skills, and access to resources and supporting better decision-making in agriculture. The role of farmer groups and cooperatives in facilitating social interaction and empowering farmers is very important. Madurese people’s myths and cultural beliefs influence farmers’ understanding of agricultural practices. Field instructors need to have cultural sensitivity and effective communication. In conclusion, social interaction and farmer empowerment positively increase agricultural productivity in Rubaru District, Sumenep. Peer-to-peer education and strong relationships between field extension workers and farmers play an important role in knowledge transfer and behavior change, providing valuable insights for the development of farmer empowerment programs and sustainable agricultural development.

Keywords: social interaction, empowerment, farmer groups, productivity

[1] Chang L, Shi F, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Saydaliev HB. Information and communication technologies development and the resource curse. Resour Policy. 2023;80:103123.

[2] Demuyakor J. Achieving active political pluralism and participation through development communication: the role of local and community radio media outlets in Northern Ghana. J Radio Audio Media. 2023;30(1):252–73.

[3] Reaser JK, Frey M, Meyers NM. Invasive species watch lists: guidance for development, communication, and application. Biol Invasions. 2020;22(1):47–51.

[4] Adams DC, Salois MJ. Local versus organic: A turn in consumer preferences and willingness-to-pay. Renew Agric Food Syst. 2010;25(4):331–41.

[5] Ren C, Liu S, Van Grinsven H, Reis S, Jin S, Liu H, et al. The impact of farm size on agricultural sustainability. J Clean Prod. 2019;220:357–67.

[6] Lalitha N, Viswanathan PK, Vinayan S. Institutional strengthening of farmer producer organizations and empowerment of small farmers in India: Evidence from a case study in Maharashtra. Millenn Asia; 2022. p. 09763996221098216.

[7] Jiao X, Zhang H, Ma W, Wang C, Li X, Zhang F. Jiao X qiang, Zhang H yan, Chong W, LI X lin, ZHANG F suo. Science and Technology Backyard: A novel approach to empower smallholder farmers for sustainable intensification of agriculture in China. J Integr Agric. 2019;18(8):1657–66.

[8] Shuai Y, Shuai C, Li W, Huang F. Shuai C min, Li W jing, Huang F bin. Role of women’s empowerment in improving farmer’s livelihood: empirical evidence from China. Qual Quant. 2019;53(2):621–39.

[9] Cerulo KA. Nonhumans in social interaction. Annu Rev Sociol. 2009;35(1):531–52.

[10] Yin X, Wang H, Xia Q, Gu Q. How social interaction affects purchase intention in social commerce: A cultural perspective. Sustainability (Basel). 2019;11(8):2423.

[11] Guo H, Marchand S. Social interactions and spillover effects in Chinese family farming. J Dev Stud. 2019;55(11):2306–28.

[12] Klerkx L, Jakku E, Labarthe P. A review of social science on digital agriculture, smart farming and agriculture 4.0: new contributions and a future research agenda. NJASWageningen. NJAS Wagening J Life Sci. 2019;90(1):100315.

[13] Kaiser M, Barnhart S, Huber-Krum S. Measuring social cohesion and social capital within the context of community food security: a confirmatory factor analysis. J Hunger Environ Nutr. 2020;15(5):591–612.

[14] Ollendorf F, Sieber S, Löhr K. Societal dynamics of sustainability certification in Ghanaian cocoa producing communities: assessing social cohesion effects and their implications for collective action. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst. 2023;47(2):212–38.

[15] Zhong YP, Tang LR, Li Y. Role of digital empowerment in developing farmers’ green production by agro-tourism integration in Xichong, Sichuan. Agriculture. 2022;12(11):1761.

[16] Ahsani RD, Wulandari C, Dinata C, Azmi NA, Fathani AT. The Challenges and Opportunities for Developing Community-Based Tourism in Indonesia. J Gov J Ilmu Pemerintah Univ Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa. 2022;7(4):864–76.

[17] Dinata C. Quadruple Helix Model in Building Communalism and Social Resilience in Handling Poverty in Rural Communities. J Transform Gov Soc Justice. 2023;1(1):11–22.

[18] Hannola L, Richter A, Richter S, Stocker A. Empowering production workers with digitally facilitated knowledge processes–a conceptual framework. Int J Prod Res. 2018;56(14):4729–43.

[19] Al-Dmour R, Yassine O, Masa’deh R. A review of literature on the associations among employee empowerment, work engagement and employee performance. Mod Appl Sci. 2018;12(11):313–29.