KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

Board of Commissioners, Chairman of Board of Directors, and Performance Audit Reports on Indonesian Banking Sector: The GMM System Approach

Published date: Aug 29 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Annual Symposium on Applied Business Economics and Communication (ASABEC) 2023

Pages: 21–40

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i25.16950

Authors:

Sudradjat ‎ Department of Accounting, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung Barat

Jouzar Farouq Ishakjouzar.farouq@polban.ac.idDepartment of Accounting, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung Barat

Arie Apriadi NugrahaDepartment of Accounting, Politeknik Negeri Bandung, Bandung Barat

Abstract:

In addition to increasing the banking industry’s relevance, timely audit reporting builds the industry’s credibility, dependability, and confidence. Still, bank delays in audit reporting are a constant in practically every nation, including Indonesia. The chairman of the board of directors and the board of commissioners’ roles in audit reporting performance are investigated in this study. This study examines three significant variables that have not been examined by prior researchers, namely the number of female commissioners, the chairman of the Board of Directors’ term of office, and the independence and size of the Board of Commissioners, in relation to the performance of audit reporting in the banking sector. The study samples were 43 commercial banks in the Indonesian capital market during the 2014-2021 period. Data is estimated using the generalized method of moments (GMM). The results show that the reporting performance of the banking sector audit in the current year is positively influenced by the performance in the previous year. The size and independence of the board of commissioners increase the banking sector audit reporting performance, conversely. The term of office of the chairman of the board decreases audit reporting performance. This study did not find the significant role of the board of commissioners and the age of the chairman of the board of directors on the reporting performance of the banking sector in Indonesia.

Keywords: board of commissioners, chairman of board of directors, audit report lag, GMM system approach

References:

[1] Ledhem MA, Mekidiche M. Economic growth and financial performance of Islamic banks: A CAMELS approach. Islamic Economic Studies. 2020;28(1):47–62.

[2] Chen X, Lu CC. The impact of the macroeconomic factors in the bank efficiency: Evidence from the Chinese city banks. North American Journal of Economics andFinance. 2021;55:101294.

[3] Lybek T, Morris J. Central bank governance: A survey of boards and management. IMF Working Papers. 2004;04(226):1–52.

[4] Leventis S, Weetman P, Caramanis C. Determinants of audit report lag: Some evidence from the Athens Stock Exchange. International Journal of Auditing. 2005;9(1):45–58.

[5] Afify HAE. Determinants of audit report lag: Does implementing corporate governance have any impact? Empirical evidence from Egypt. Journal of Applied Accounting Research. 2009;10(1):56–86.

[6] Bhuiyan MBU, D’Costa M. Audit committee ownership and audit report lag: Evidence from Australia. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management. 2020;28(1):96–125.

[7] Lajmi A, Yab M. The impact of internal corporate governance mechanisms on audit report lag: Evidence from Tunisian listed companies. EuroMed Journal of Business. 2022;17(4):619–33.

[8] Toumi F, Khlif H, Khelil I. National culture and audit report lag: cross-country investigation. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. 2022;

[9] Kim Y, Lee J, Yang T. Corporate transparency and firm performance: Evidence from venture firms listed on the Korean Stock Market. Vol. 42, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies. 2013. 653–688 p.

[10] Dao M, Pham T. Audit tenure, auditor specialization and audit report lag. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2014;29(6):490–512.

[11] Sultana N, Singh H, Van der Zahn JLWM. Audit Committee Characteristics and Audit Report Lag. International Journal of Auditing. 2015;19(2):72–87.

[12] Basuony MAK, Mohamed EKA, Hussain MM, Marie OK. Board characteristics, ownership structure and audit report lag in the Middle East. International Journal of Corporate Governance. 2016;7(2):180.

[13] Hassan YM. Determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Palestine. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 2016;6(1):13–32.

[14] Jouini F. Cost of debt, corporate disclosure and audit report lag. EuroMed J of Management. 2018;2(3):240.

[15] Habib A, Bhuiyan MBU, Huang HJ, Miah MS. Determinants of audit report lag: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Auditing. 2019;23(1):20–44.

[16] Abdillah MR, Mardijuwono AW, Habiburrochman H. The effect of company characteristics and auditor characteristics to audit report lag. Asian Journal of Accounting Research. 2019;4(1):129–44.

[17] Handoyo S, Maulana ED. Determinants of audit report lag of financial statements in banking sector. Matrik : Jurnal Manajemen, Strategi Bisnis dan Kewirausahaan. 2019;13(2):142.

[18] Kaaroud MA, Mohd Ariffin N, Ahmad M. The extent of audit report lag and governance mechanisms: Evidence from Islamic banking institutions in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. 2020;11(1):70–89.

[19] Chalu H. Board characteristics, auditing characteristics and audit report lag in African Central Banks. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 2021;11(4):578–609.

[20] Sharma V, Naiker V, Lee B. Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: Evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons. 2009;23(3):245– 63.

[21] Nahar Abdullah S. Board structure and ownership in Malaysia: The case of distressed listed companies. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society. 2006;6(5):582–94.

[22] Adams RB, Ferreira D. Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of financial economics. 2009;94(2):291–309.

[23] Ahern KR, Dittmar AK. The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. The quarterly journal of economics. 2012;127(1):137–97.

[24] Bennouri M, Chtioui T, Nagati H, Nekhili M. Female board directorship and firm performance: What really matters? Journal of Banking & Finance. 2018;88:267

[25] Mori N. Directors’ diversity and board performance: Evidence from East African microfinance institutions. Journal of African Business. 2014;15(2):100–13.

[26] Campbell K, Mínguez-Vera A. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics. 2008;83:435–51.

[27] Amran A, Lee SP, Devi SS. The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment. 2014;23(4):217–35.

[28] Gupta N, Mahakud J. CEO characteristics and bank performance: Evidence from India. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2020;35(8):1057–93.

[29] Nkundabanyanga SK, Ahiauzu A, Sejjaaka SK, Ntayi JM. A model for effective board governance in Uganda’s services sector firms. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 2013;3(2):125–44.

[30] Wijethilake C, Ekanayake A, Perera S. Board involvement in corporate performance: evidence from a developing country. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 2015;5(5):250–68.

[31] Zgarni I, Hlioui K, Zehri F. Effective audit committee, audit quality and earnings management: Evidence from Tunisia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 2016;6(2):138–55.

[32] Alfraih MM. Corporate governance mechanisms and audit delay in a joint audit regulation. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 2016;24(3):292

[33] Donaldson L, Davis JH. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of management. 1991;16(1):49–64.

[34] Fama EF, Jensen MC. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics. 1983;26(2):301–25.

[35] Reddy S, Jadhav AM. Gender diversity in boardrooms–A literature review. Cogent Economics and Finance. 2019;7(1):1–11.

[36] Carter DA, Simkins BJ, Simpson WG. Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. The Financial Review. 2003;38:33–53.

[37] Lipton M, Lorsch JW. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. The business lawyer. 1992;59–77.

[38] Mathuva DM, Tauringana V, Owino FJO. Corporate governance and the timeliness of audited financial statements: The case of Kenyan listed firms. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies. 2019;9(4):473–501.

[39] Ezat A, El-Masry A. The impact of corporate governance on the timeliness of corporate internet reporting by Egyptian listed companies. Managerial Finance. 2008;34(12):848–67.

[40] Smith N, Smith V, Verner M. Do women in top management affect firm performance? A panel study of 2,500 Danish firms. International Journal of productivity and Performance management. 2006;55(7):569–93.

[41] Waelchli U, Zeller J. Old captains at the helm: Chairman age and firm performance. Journal of Banking and Finance. 2013;37(5):1612–28.

[42] Xiong J. Chairman characteristics and earnings management: Evidence from Chinese listed firms. Open Journal of Accounting. 2016;5(4):82–94.

[43] Al-Absy MSM, Ku Ismail KNI, Chandren S. Audit committee chairman characteristics and earnings management: The influence of family chairman. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. 2019;11(4):339–70.

[44] Michel JG, Hambrick DC. Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management journal. 1992;35(1):9–37.

[45] Francis J, Huang AH, Rajgopal S, Zang AY. CEO reputation and earnings quality. Contemporary accounting research. 2008;25(1):109–47.

[46] Baatwah SR, Salleh Z, Ahmad N. CEO characteristics and audit report timeliness: do CEO tenure and financial expertise matter? Managerial Auditing Journal. 2015;30(8– 9):998–1022.

[47] Zhang Y, Wiersema MF. Stock market reaction to CEO certification: the signaling role of CEO background. Strategic Management Journal. 2009;30(7):693–710.

[48] Oussii AA, Boulila Taktak N. Audit report timeliness: Does internal audit function coordination with external auditors matter? Empirical evidence from Tunisia. EuroMed Journal of Business. 2018;13(1):60–74.

[49] Udin S, Khan MA, Javid AY. The effects of ownership structure on likelihood of financial distress: An empirical evidence. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society. 2017;17(4):589–612.

[50] Molla MI, Islam MS, Rahaman MK Bin. Corporate governance structure and bank performance: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences. 2021;

[51] Bezawada B, Adaelli SR. Corporate governance, board characteristics and performance of Indian Banks: An empirical study. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues. 2020;10(3):83–7.

[52] Sarkar J, Sarkar S. Bank ownership, board characteristics and performance: Evidence from commercial banks in India. International Journal of Financial Studies. 2018;6(17):1–29.

[53] Chandani S, Mabood M, Mahmood W. The effect of women director on banks performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Independent Journal of Management & Production. 2018;9(3):958.

[54] Jubilee RVW, Khong RWL, Hung WT. Would diversified corporate boards add value? The case of banking institutions in Malaysia. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. 2018;10(2–3):218–28.

[55] Beji R, Yousfi O, Loukil N, Omri A. Board diversity and corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence from France. Journal of Business Ethics. 2021;173(1):133–55.

[56] Fahad P, Rahman PM. Impact of corporate governance on CSR disclosure. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance. 2020;17(2–3):155–67.

[57] Jouber H. Is the effect of board diversity on CSR diverse? New insights from one-tier vs two-tier corporate board models. Corporate Governance (Bingley). 2021;21(1):23– 61.

[58] Salehi M, Mahmoudabadi M, Adibian MS, Rezaei Ranjbar H. The potential impact of managerial entrenchment on firms’ corporate social responsibility activities andfinancial performance: Evidence from Iran. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. 2020;

[59] Salike N, Ao B. Determinants of bank’s profitability: Role of poor asset quality in Asia. China Finance Review International. 2018;8(2):216–31.

[60] Migliardo C, Forgione AF. Ownership structure and bank performance in EU-15 countries. Corporate Governance (Bingley). 2018;18(3):509–30.

[61] Athari SA, Adaoglu C, Bektas E. Investor protection and dividend policy: The case of Islamic and conventional banks. Emerging Markets Review. 2016;27:100–17.

[62] Tarchouna A, Jarraya B, Bouri A. How to explain non-performing loans by many corporate governance variables simultaneously? A corporate governance index is built to US commercial banks. Research in International Business and Finance. 2018;42:645–57.

[63] Bukair AA, Abdul Rahman A. Bank performance and board of directors attributes by Islamic banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. 2015;8(3):291–309.

[64] Al-Kayed LT. Dividend payout policy of Islamic vs conventional banks: Case of Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management. 2017;10(1):117–28.

[65] Knechel WR, Sharma DS. Auditor-provided nonaudit services and audit effectiveness and efficiency: Evidence from pre- and post-SOX audit report lags. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol 31, No 4 November 2012 pp 85–114 American. 2012;31(4):85–114.

[66] Peni E. CEO and Chairperson characteristics and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance. 2014;18(1):185–205.

[67] Ouma C, Webi RY. Effect of age diversity of board members on performance of non-governmental organizations in Kenya. International Journal of Novel Research in Marketing Management and Economics. 2017;4(2):101–23.

[68] Ferrero-Ferrero I, Fernández-Izquierdo MÁ, Mu noz-Torres MJ. The impact of the board of directors characteristics on corporate performance and risk-taking before and during the global financial crisis. Review of Managerial Science. 2012;6(3):207– 26.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

8 Abstract Views

37 PDF Downloads