Published date: Aug 15 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 6th Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (6th SoRes): Ethical Governance

Pages: 635–642

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i24.16896

Hendrik A. E. Laohendriklao33@gmail.comInstitut Agama Kritsen Negeri Kupang, Kupang

Anita A. Hege UdjuInstitut Agama Kritsen Negeri Kupang, Kupang

Andrian Wira Syah PutraInstitut Agama Kritsen Negeri Kupang, Kupang

This research is supported by the results of the library study of State Vocational School 4 Kupang City construction on the implementation of the National Assessment in 2021, which has not reached the minimum standard of level 3. Also, the average repeat results at the end of the semester are in the academic year 2021/2022, whose classical intensity has not reached 75%. The data from the UN results in 2019, which are the standard for determining the quality of education in Indonesia, revealed that the State Vocational School 4 Kupang City buildings are in the low category. In addition, the average results of the assessment of teacher performance have not reached the maximum standard (good). Considering this, researchers found that there are problems that need to be addressed, especially teacher performance. This research aims to find out to what extent the performance of teachers influences the quality of education in the State Vocational School 4 Kupang City. The method used in this survey is based on a quantitative approach. Data collection techniques are used through questionnaires/surveys, observations, and documentation to understand the influence of teacher performance on the quality of education. The results of the research are based on a summary model test that obtains a value of R squared (R2), which indicates that the influence of the Teacher Performance variable (X) on the Quality of Education variable (Y) is 0.715 = 71.5%, meaning that the performance of teachers has a very significant contribution to the improvement of the quality of education. Thus, it’s concluded that the performance of teachers has a significant influence on the quality of education.

Keywords: teacher performance, educational quality and national assessment

[1] Mulyasa E. Standar kompetensi dan sertifikasi guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosda karya; 2012.

[2] Tumiran. Peningkatan kinerja guru dalam pengembangan kualitas peserta didik melalui budaya organisasi sekolah. Pendidikan. 2018;3(2).

[3] Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 14 tahun 2005 tentang guru dan dosen.

[4] Lao HA. Manajemen pendidikan. Klaten-Jawa Tengah: Lakeisha; 2021.

[5] Frelberg HJ, Driscoll A. Universal Teaching Strategies. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 1992.

[6] Priansa DJ, Somad R, Kasmanah A. Manajemen supervisi & kepemimpinan kepala sekolah. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2014.

[7] Fahmi A, Hardiansyah H, Suryanata IMO. Hubungan kinerja guru dengan mutu pendidikan di sekolah. Mataram: Prodi Administrasi Pendidikan, FIK IKIP Mataram; 2018.

[8] Hasan B, Zamroni. Manajemen mutu pendidikan. Tulung Agung: Perum. BMW Madani Kavling; 2017.

[9] Timor H. Mutu sekolah; Antara kepemimpinan kepala sekolah dan kinerja guru. J. Adm. Pendidik. 2018;25(1):21–30.

[10] Mulyasa H. Uji kompetensi dan penilaian kinerja guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya; 2013.

[11] Puspitasari D, Mulyo HM. Hubungan tingkat self-efficacy guru dengan tingkat burnout pada guru sekolah inklusif di Surabaya. J. Psikol. 2018;2(4).

[12] Danim S. Visi baru manajemen sekolah. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara; 2006.

[13] Sugiyono, Metode penelitian: Pendidikan pendekatan kuantitati dan kualitatif R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2013.

[14] Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2006.

[15] Kartowagiran B. Kinerja guru profesional (guru pasca sertifikasi). J. Cakrawala Pendidik. 2015 Apr;3(3): https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.4208.

[16] Ardiana TE. Pengaruh motivasi kerja guru terhadap kinerja guru akuntansi smk di Kota Madiun. J. Akunt. dan Pajak. 2017;17(02), https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v17i02.11

[17] Muspawi M. Strategi peningkatan kinerja guru. J. Ilm. Univ. Batanghari Jambi. 2021;21(1):101.

[18] Indriawati P, Maulida N, Erni DN, Putri WH. Kinerja guru dalam mutu pendidikan di SMAN 02 Balikpapan. J. Penelitian, Pendidik. dan Pengajaran JPPP. 2022;3(3):204–15, https://doi.org/10.30596/jppp.v3i3.12795

[19] Hadis A, Nurhayati B. Manajemen mutu pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2010.

[20] Fadhli M. Manajemen peningkatan mutu pendidikan. TADBIR J. Stud. Manaj. Pendidik. 2017;1(02), https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v1i2.295

[21] Alfandi H. Desain pembelajaran yang demokratis & humanis. Malang: UIN Malang Press; 2009.

[22] Khaerudin. Kualitas instrumen hasil belajar. J. Madaniyah. 2015;2:212–35.

[23] Miller MD, Linn RL, Gronlund N. Measurement and assessment in teaching. New Jersey: Pearson Higher Education; 2012.

[24] Sirait L. Peningkatan kompetensi pedagogik guru melalui pelaksanaan supervisi akademik. Nuansa Akad. J. Pembang. Masy; 2021, https://doi.org/10.47200/jnajpm.v6i1.691