Published date: Aug 15 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 6th Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (6th SoRes): Ethical Governance

Pages: 492–510

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i24.16865

Benny Diah MadusariUniversitas Pekalongan, Pekalongan

Amalia FitriFitriamalia280186@gmail.comUniversitas Pekalongan, Pekalongan

Muhammad Ali GunawanUniversitas Pekalongan, Pekalongan

Tri Yusufi MardianaUniversitas Pekalongan, Pekalongan

The government (both central and regional) has addressed the issue of tidal flooding in Pekalongan City through various means. However, tidal floods will continue to pose a threat to Pekalongan City in the future. It is necessary to integrate policy programs and research approaches that adhere to the principles of sustainable development (ecological justice). One of the popular models today is the Life Cycle Approach (LCA). This study aims to 1) develop a tidal flood mitigation model in Pekalongan City using a Life Cycle Approach (LCA), 2) Analyze the advantages and disadvantages of applying a tidal flood mitigation model with a life cycle approach in the coastal area of Pekalongan City. This research is a development research carried out using a Participative Action Research (PRA) approach. Data collection techniques involve triangulation and analyzed using mixed methods. The results of this study indicate that: 1) the tidal flood mitigation model in Pekalongan City with a life cycle approach meets validation standards/criteria, 2) advantages: oriented to long-term solutions, more effective in overcoming tidal flood problems, can reduce maintenance costs, encourage involvement community, can improve environmental quality. Disadvantages of LCA: requires more time and cost, lack of flexibility, difficult decision-making, inability to guarantee project success, and lack of community participation, 3) Solutions to overcome weaknesses or disadvantages in implementing a tidal flood mitigation model with a life cycle approach in the coastal area of Pekalongan City, namely: a) speeding up the planning process, b) enhancing flexibility, c) improving transparency of decision-making, d) conducting simulations and trials, and e) increasing public participation.

Keywords: mitigation model, tidal flooding, life cycle approach (LCA)

[1] Jumatiningrum N, Indrayati A. Strategi Adaptasi Masyarakat Kelurahan Bandengan Kecamatan Pekalongan Utara dalam Menghadapi Banjir Pasang Air Laut (Rob). Edu Geography. 2021;5(2):52–9.

[2] Utami CW, Giyarsih SR, Marfai MA, Fariz TR. Muh. A. Marfai, and T. R. Fariz, “Kerawanan Banjir Rob dan Peran Gender Dalam Adaptasi di Kecamatan Pekalongan Utara,”. Jurnal Planologi. 2021;18(1):94.

[3] Andrea RM, Sudharto PH, Kismartini K. “Strategi Adaptasi Non-struktural dalam Menghadapi Banjir Pasang: Studi Kasus Kota Pekalongan,” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Lahan Suboptimalke-8 Tahun 2020, pp. 103–108, 2020.

[4] Ismanto K, Pratikwo S, Diah Madusari B, Agung Christianto P. Analisis Kebutuhan Masyarakat Terdampak Banjir Rob: Studi Kasus Kota Pekalongan. Jurnal Litbang Kota Pekalongan. 2021;20(1):20–8.

[5] Yuniarti TS, Margawati A, Nuryanto N. FAKTOR RISIKO KEJADIAN STUNTING ANAK USIA 1-2 TAHUN DI DAERAH ROB KOTA PEKALONGAN. Jurnal Riset Gizi. 2019;7(2):115–9.

[6] Syarifah N, Ningrum WA, Zuhana N, et al. “Tingkat Pengetahuan dan Sikap Terhadap Tindakan Pengobatan Mandiri Penyakit Kutu Air,” Proceeding of The …, pp. 215–221, 2021.

[7] M. Safitri and Sugiharto, “Status Kesehatan Korban Banjir Rob di Desa Jeruksari Kabupaten Pekalongan,”. Jurnal Profesi Kesehatan Masyarakat. 2021;2(1):31–54.

[8] Rusmariana A. Identifiksi Trauma Dampak Rob pada Anak di Kabupaten Pekalongan. Jurnal Ilmiah Kesehatan. 2020;13(2):123–8.

[9] Nusa AB, Tarigan AP, Purwoko A, Saputra NA. Pemodelan Peta Rawan Banjir Rob di Belawan. Jurnal Pembangunan Perkotaan. 2020;8(1):23–32.

[10] Setyaningsih W, Benardi AI, Aji A, Kahfi A. Pengembangan Model Spasial Kajian Perluasan Rob Terhadap Perubahan Kondisi Masyarakat Di Kota Semarang. Indonesian Journal of Conservation. 2019;8(02):89–94.

[11] Kurniawan D, Yulianto S, Prasetyo J, Fibriani C. Sebaran Vegetasi pada Kawasan Berpotensi Bencana Banjir Pesisir (Rob) Kota Semarang. Indonesian Journal of Modelling and Computing. 2021;4(1):10–3.

[12] Syafitri AW, Rochani A. Analisis Penyebab Banjir Rob di Kawasan Pesisir Studi Kasus: Jakarta Utara, Semarang Timur, Kabupaten Brebes, Pekalongan. Jurnal Kajian Ruang. 2022;1(1):16.

[13] Ikhwanudin F. Yudaningrum, D. Ariawan, and W. Hermanto, “Alternative Penanganan Banjir Di Sungai Banger. Semarang: Universitas PGRI Semarang; 2020. pp. 179–89.

[14] R. H. Sauda, A. L. Nugraha, and Hani’ah, “Kajian Pemetaan Kerentanan Banjir Rob Di Kabupaten Pekalongan,”. Jurnal Geodesi Undip. 2019;8(1):466–74.

[15] Egaputra AA, Ismunarti DH, Pranowo WS. Inventarisasi Kejadian Banjir Rob Kota Semarang Periode 2012 –2020. Indonesian Journal of Oceanography. 2022;4(2):29–40.

[16] Erlani R, Nugrahandika WH. Ketangguhan Kota Semarang dalam Menghadapi Bencana Banjir Pasang Air Laut (Rob). Journal of Regional and Rural Development Planning. 2019;3(1):47–63.

[17] Novita MG, Helmi M, Widiaratih R, Hariyadi H, Wirasatriya A. Mengkaji Area Genangan Banjir Pasang Terhadap Penggunaan Lahan Pesisir Tahun 2020 Menggunakan Metode Geospasial di Kabupaten Pekalongan, Provinsi Ja. Indonesian Journal of Oceanography. 2021;3(3):237–49.

[18] Tahun B, Pratiwi FN, Asbi AM, Kurnianingsih NA. “Identifikasi Gejala Perubahan Iklim Di Kota Bandar Lampung Berdasarkan Data Iklim Makro Tahun 1998-,” vol. 1, pp. 43– 53, 2022.

[19] Ilmi WZ, Asbi AM, Syam T. Identifikasi Kapasitas Penanggulangan Pada Kawasan Informal Pesisir Kota Bandar Lampung Dalam Menghadapi Dampak Perubahan Iklim. Jurnal Pengembangan Kota. 2020;8(2):177–87.

[20] Triana YT, Hidayah Z. “Kajian Potensi Daerah Rawan Banjir Rob Dan Adaptasi Masyarakat Di Wilayah Pesisir Utara Surabaya,” Juvenil:Jurnal Ilmiah Kelautan dan Perikanan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 141–150, 2020, https://doi.org/10.21107/juvenil.v1i1.6961.

[21] A. Krama, “Tidal Flood Modeling using Steel and Torrie Methods in the Jakarta Region (Tidal Flood Modeling using Steel and Torrie Methods in the Jakarta Region) ,” no. June, 2022.

[22] Wahyuni H, Suranto S. Dampak Deforestasi Hutan Skala Besar terhadap Pemanasan Global di Indonesia. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan. 2021;6(1):148–62.

[23] Pratama R, Parinduri L. “Penganggulangan Pemanasan Global,” Cetak) Buletin Utama Teknik, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 91–95, 2019.

[24] Widada S, Ismanto A, Priambodo IB, Siagian H. Perubahan Garis Pantai dan Dampaknya Terhadap Banjir Rob di Kecamatan Pekalongan Utara, Kota Pekalongan, Privinsi Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis. 2022;25(1):121–30.

[25] Wijaya UA, Suhardi D. Penanganan Permasalahan Banjir di Kota Semarang. Seminar Keinsinyuran Program; 2022. pp. 2797–9.

[26] Salim MA, Siswanto AB. Kajian Penanganan Dampak Banjir Kabupaten Pekalongan M. Rang Teknik Journal. 2021;4(2):295–303.

[27] Turisno BE, Suharto R, Priyono EA. Peran Serta Masyarakat Dan Kewenangan Pemerintah Dalam Konservasi Mangrove Sebagai Upaya Mencegah Rob Dan Banjir Serta Sebagai Tempat Wisata. Masalah-Masalah Hukum. 2018;47(4):479.

[28] Asriani I, Sudarsono B, Wahyuddin Y. analisis kesesuaian penggunaan lahan mangrove dan tambak dengan rencana tata ruang wilayah (studi kasus : kab. Pati). Jurnal Geodesi Undip. 2021;10(1):241–9.

[29] Konom NH, Cabuy RL, Wanma AO. Identifikasi Kerusakan Areal Hutan Mangrove Akibat Aktivitas Penduduk Di Daerah Airtiba Kabupaten Kaimana. 2019;2(2):153–63.

[30] Kader A. Penghijauan Hutan Mangrove Danau Gurua Marasi Di Kelurahan Guraping Kota Tidore Kepulauan. Abdimu Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 2021;1(1):4– 11.

[31] Wattimena RM, Leatemia W, Tahamata LC. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hutan Mangrove Pada Areal Pesisir Pantai. Balobe Law Journal. 2021;1(2):109.

[32] Rahmadi MT, Suciani A, Auliani N. “Analisis Perubahan Luasan Hutan Mangrove Menggunakan Citra Landsat 8 OLI di Desa Lubuk Kertang Langkat,” vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 110–119, 2020.

[33] Noer Dwi AA, Fithria A, Kissinger K. Strategi Pengembangan Hutan Mangrove Di Kecamatan Jorong Kabupaten Tanah Laut Kabupaten Kalimantan Selatan. Jurnal Hutan Tropis. 2021;9(1):88.

[34] Tokan K. Pemanfaatan Kawasan Hutan Bakau Sebagai Lokasi Perumahan Di Kabupaten Kotabaru Di Tinjau Dari Aspek Yuridis. Al’Adl. 2020;XII(1):12–38.

[35] Mukhtar DS, Pradoto W. Penilaian Tingkat Kapasitas Adaptasi Terhadap Bencana Banjir Rob Berdasarkan Pengaruh Pembangunan Tanggul Laut Pada Kawasan Pesisir Kota Pekalongan (Studi Kasus: kecamatan Pekalongan Utara) [Perencanaan Wilayah Kota]. Teknik PWK. 2021;10(4):311–20.

[36] Ramadhanty NR, Muryani C, Tjahjono GA. Analisis Tingkat Kerentanan Masyarakat Terhadap Banjir Rob Di Kecamatan Tegal Barat Kota Tegal Tahun 2021 Nisa. International Journal Environment and Disaster. 2022;1(1):73–82.

[37] Gaffara GR, Wulandari F. “Analisis Perubahan Penggunaan Lahan Terhadap Bahaya Amblesan Tanah Di Kecamatan Semarang Utara,” in Seminar Nasional Geomatika 2018: Penggunaan dan Pengembangan Produk Informasi Geospasial Mendukung Daya Saing Nasional, Universitas Gajah Mada, 2018, pp. 1089–1098.

[38] L. Y. Ledoh, A. Satria, and R. Hidayat, “Kerentanan Penghidupan Masyarakat Pesisir Perkotaan Terhadap Variabilitas Iklim (Studi Kasus di Kota Kupang),” Jurnal Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Alam dan Lingkungan (Journal of Natural Resources and Environmental Management), vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 758–770, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.29244/jpsl.9.3.758-770..

[39] Taufik R, Citra Dewi P, Widina K, Anwar A. Analisis Banjir di Kota Bandung dengan Pemodelan Sistem Rich Picture Diagram. Jurnal Inovasi Masyarakat. 2021;01(02):202–10.

[40] Fajar M, Mediani A, Finesa Y. Analisis Peranan IPAL Dalam Stategi Penanganan Limbah Industri Batik di Kota Pekalongan. Pengembangan Wilayah Berkelanjutan di Era Revolusi Industri. 2019;4(0):84–90.

[41] Kiswanto K, Rahayu LN, Wintah W. Pengolahan Limbah Cair Batik Menggunakan Teknologi Membran Nanofiltrasi Di Kota Pekalongan. Jurnal Litbang Kota Pekalongan. 2019;17:72–82.

[42] Khasna S. Evaluasi Kebijakan Pengelolaan Limbah Batik di Kota Pekalongan. Transparansi : Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi. 2021;4(1):28–36.

[43] Miftakhudin S. Strategi Penanganan Banjir Rob Kota Pekalongan. Jurnal Litbang Kota Pekalongan. 2021;20(1):29–38.

[44] Rahman LF, Ozcelebi T, Lukkien J. Understanding IoT Systems: A Life Cycle Approach. Procedia Comput Sci. 2018;130:1057–62.

[45] Archambault B, Rivot E, Savina M, Le Pape O. Using a spatially structured life cycle model to assess the influence of multiple stressors on an exploited coastal-nurserydependent population. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2018;201(February):95–104.

[46] Kumar M, Rashid E. An Efficient Software Development Life cycle Model for Developing Software Project. International Journal of Education and Management Engineering. 2018;8(6):59–68.

[47] Christopherson L, Mandal A, Scott E, Baldin I. “Toward a Data Lifecycle Model for NSF Large Facilities,” ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, pp. 168– 175, 2020,

[48] Dove R, Schindel B. Agile Systems Engineering Life Cycle Model for Mixed Discipline Engineering. INCOSE Int Symp. 2019;29(1):86–104.

[49] Qiao Q, Zhao F, Liu Z, He X, Hao H. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of Electric Vehicles in China : combining the vehicle cycle and fuel cycle. Energy. 2019;177:222– 33.

[50] Galama TJ, van Kippersluis H. A Theory of Socio-economic Disparities in Health over the Life Cycle. Econ J (Lond). 2019 Jan;129(617):338–74.

[51] Schulhofer-Wohl S. The age-time-cohort problem and the identification of structural parameters in life-cycle models. Quant Econom. 2018;9(2):643–58.

[52] Nazzaro C, Stanco M, Marotta G. The life cycle of corporate social responsibility in agri-food: value creation models. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(4):1287.

[53] Potůček R. Life Cycle of the Crisis Situation Threat and its Various Models. Research Gate; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18593-0.

[54] Ziyadi M, Al-Qadi IL. Model uncertainty analysis using data analytics for life-cycle assessment (LCA) applications. Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2019;24(5):945–59.

[55] Lodato C, Tonini D, Damgaard A, Fruergaard Astrup T. A process-oriented lifecycle assessment (LCA) model for environmental and resource-related technologies (EASETECH). Int J Life Cycle Assess. 2020;25(1):73–88.

[56] Kouloumpis V, Azapagic A. Integrated life cycle sustainability assessment using fuzzy inference: A novel FELICITA model. Sustain Prod Consum. 2018;15:25–34.

[57] Wong EY, Ho DC, So S, Tsang CW, Chan EM. Life cycle assessment of electric vehicles and hydrogen fuel cell vehicles using the greet model—a comparative study. Sustainability (Basel). 2021;13(9):4872.

[58] Gall MD, Gall JP, Borg WR. Educational Research: An Introduction, Seventh Edition, Seventh. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc., 2003.

[59] Skovdal M, Cornish F. Qualitative Research for Development: A Guide for Practitioners. Rugby, UK: Practical Action Publishing; 2015. https://doi.org/10.3362/9781780448534.

[60] muhammad ali Gunawan, Statistik Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, Psikologi dan Sosial. 2015.

[61] Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative Data Analysis: Methods Sourcebook, Third. California: SAGE Publications, Inc., 2014.