Published date: Aug 15 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 6th Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (6th SoRes): Ethical Governance

Pages: 350–363

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i24.16849

Diana Wiyantidiana@unisba.ac.idUniversitas Islam Bandung, Bandung

Neni Sri ImaniyatiUniversitas Islam Bandung, Bandung

Nurul ChotidjahUniversitas Islam Bandung, Bandung

The supervisory agency for the financial services sector in Indonesia is currently implemented by the Financial Services Authority whose existence is contained in the Financial Services Authority (Otoritas Jasa Keuangan/OJK) Law Number 21 the Year 2011. OJK oversees all financial institutions, including the capital market. The supervision model carried out by the OJK is a single model. Thus, OJK becomes a super body institution meaning that OJK is the only institution that has regulatory and supervisory authority over all financial service institutions. The effect of this model on investor protection is to be less than optimal. This study aimed to first find supervisory models for financial institutions, and second, to evaluate the model of capital market supervision to protect investors and propose a new model of supervision. This research uses juridical and normative methods. The juridical approach refers to statutory regulations, while the normative approach refers to legal principles and case studies also called library legal research. Research specifications use descriptive and prescriptive analysis. The data used is secondary data, which includes primary and secondary legal materials. All data collected was then processed and analyzed using qualitative methods. After analysis, the data is described and linked to each other systematically, and ultimately compiled or presented in the form of legal writing. The results showed that, first, there are several supervisory models for financial institutions, such as the Multi-supervisory Model, the Twin Peak Supervisory Model, the Functional model, and the Integrated (Single) Supervisory model. Second, the Single Supervisory model for investor protection is less than optimal. A partially integrated model is the recommendation of a new model of capital market supervision to protect investors.

Keywords: supervision, OJK, capital markets, protection, investors

[1] Nasution A. Macroeconomic Policies in Indonesia: Indonesia Economy Since the Asian Financial Crisis of 1997. London: Routledge; 2015.

[2] Abrams RK, Taylor MW. “Issues in the Unification of Financial Sector Supervision,” 213, 2000. [Online]. Available: International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781451874938.001.

[3] S. D. Andryanto, “11 Tahun OJK Gantikan Bapepam LK Konglomerasi Sistem Keuangan Jadi Alasan,” Tempo.co, 2022.

[4] R. M. Pikahulan, “Implementasi Fungsi Pengaturan serta Pengawasan pada Bank Indonesia dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) terhadap Perbankan,” J. Penegakan Huk. dan Keadilan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 41–51, 2020, https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1103..

[5] Khasanah U. Pengaturan Dan Peran Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Terhadap Screening Saham Pasar Modal Syariah. J. Law Policy Transform. 2021;6(2):19.

[6] Rahmah M. Hukum Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Kencana; 2019.

[7] Mawei S. Pengawasan Pasar Modal di Indonesia Pasca Terbentuknya Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Lex Priv. 2016;4(6):155–62.

[8] Rahmadi R. Investasi Dan Pasar Modal, Memahami Peranan Bank Indonesia, Bapepam-Lk, Dan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Lingkungan Pasar Modal. Supremasi Huk. 2019;15(2):100–10.

[9] Kalagison I. Tinjauan Yuridis Tentang Perbandingan antara Pengawasan Pasar Modal oleh Bapepam-LK dengan Pengawasan Pasar Modal oleh OJK. Lex Soc. 2019;VII(7):138–47.

[10] Wowor RY. Pengawasan Pasar Modal di Indonesia Menurut UU Nomor 21 Tahun 2011. Lex Priv. 2016;4(1):103–10.

[11] Sitompul Z. Konsepsi dan Transformasi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Legis. Indones. 2012;9(3):343–60.

[12] Saskia R. Kajian Hukum Terhadap Perspektif Peranan Pengawasan Hukum Pasar Modal di Indonesia. Lex Soc. 2015;III(2):17–25.

[13] Rachmadini VN. “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Investor Dalam Pasar Modal Menurut Undang-Undang Pasar Modal Dan Undang-Undang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan,” Pena Justisia Media Komun. dan Kaji. Huk. 2019;18(2):89–96.

[14] R. K. Hastuti, “Terungkap ini potensi besar dari pasar modal Indonesia.,” CNBC Indonesia, Jakarta, p. Diunduh 1 Oktober 2022, Jul. 29, 2020.

[15] M. Nafik HR. Bursa Efek dan Investasi Syariah. Jakarta: Serambi Ilmu Semesta Jakarta; 2009.

[16] Safitri I. Transparansi Independensi dan Pengawasan Kejahatan Pasar Modal. Jakarta: Go Global Book Safitri & Co Publication Book Division; 1998.

[17] Wiyanti D, Suhardiman ED, Siska F. “Pemeriksaan Tindak Pidana di Bidang Pasar Modal Dalam Rangka Melaksanakan Fungsi Pengawasan Pasca Lahirnya Undang- Undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2011 Tentang Otoritas Jasa Keuangan,” Pros. SNaPP2014 Sos. Ekon. dan Hum., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 107–114, 2014.

[18] Asih ET, Dewi NW. “Reaksi Pasar terhadap Pernyataan Resmi Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan terkait Mega Skandal Jiwasraya,” J. Ilm. Akunt. dan Humanika, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 78–88, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJA/article/view/26905/18215

[19] Sandria F. Deretan Skandal Lapkeu di Pasar Saham RI, Indofarma-Hanson (Serangkaian Skandal Laporan Keuangan di Pasar Saham Indonesia, Indofarma- Hanson), 27 Juli 2021, 13:30. CNBC Indonesia; 2021.

[20] Irwansyah, Penelitian Hukum- Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel, Edisi Revi. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media; 2021.

[21] Manan B. Menyongsong Fajar Otonomi Daerah. Yogyakarta: Pusat Studi Hukum FH UII; 2001.

[22] Nasir C. “Pengawasan terhadap Kebijakan Pemerintah Melalui Mekanisme Citizen Lawsuit (Supervision of Government Policy Through the mechanism of Citizen Lawsuit),” J. Konstitusi, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 907–926, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/229114-pengawasanterhadap- kebijakan-pemerintah-41c88480.pdf

[23] Kane EJ. “Regulation and supervision: An ethical perspective,” Cambridge, 13895, 2008. https://doi.org/10.3386/w13895.

[24] M. Dja’is, “Fungsi Paradigma Dalam Perkembangan Ilmu Hukum,” J. Masal. Huk. Fak. Huk. Undip, vol. IV, no. Januari-Maret, 1999.

[25] A. Grünblicher and P. Darlap, “Regulation and supervision of financial markets and institutions: A European perspective,” Austrian Financ. Mark. Auth., no. July, 2003.

[26] Schmulow AD. The four methods of financial system regulation: An international comparative survey. J. Bank. Financ. Law Pract. 2015;26(3):151–72.

[27] Erdélyi OJ. Twin peaks for Europe: State-of-the-art financial supervisory consolidation - rethinking the group support regime under solvency II. Frankfurt: Springer International Publishing; 2015.

[28] The Group of Thirty. The structure of financial supervision: Approaches and challenges in a global marketplace. Washington DC, 2008.

[29] D. Calvo, J. Crisanto, S. Hohl, and O. Cutierrez, “Financial supervisory architecture: What has changed after the crisis?,” 8, 2018.

[30] Rahmi M, Sholihah DR, Nopiyanti A. Millennial generation intentions in the Islamic Capital Market. Int. J. Emerg. Issues Islam. Stud. 2023;3(1):49–67.

[31] Darmansyah, “Siaran Pers OJK Perkuat Pengawasan Pasar Modal Tingkatkan Perlindungan Investor,” 2022.

[32] Helleiner E. Understanding the 2007–2008 Global Financial Crisis: Lessons for scholars of international political economy. Annu Rev Polit Sci. 2011;14(1):67–87.

[33] Masciandaro D, Quintyn M. Regulating the regulators: The changing face of financial supervision architectures before and after the financial crisis. Eur. Co. Law. 2009;6(5):1–40.

[34] Masciandaro D, Quintyn M, Pansini RV. “Economic crisis: Did financial supervision matter?” Brussels, 2011.

[35] Duong PT. Impacts of the 2008 global financial crisis on securities market supervision and implications for emerging markets : Regulatory perspectives. Southern Cross University; 2016.

[36] M. Taylor and A. Fleming, “Integrated financial supervision: Lessons of Northern European Experience,” no. September, 1999.

[37] Mwenda KK, Fleming A. “International developments in the organizational structure of financial services supervision,” World Bank Financ. Sect., vol. Washington, 2001.

[38] Murdadi B. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) Pengawas Keuangan Baru Yang Memiliki Kewenangan Penyidikan. Value Added. 2012;8(2):32–46.

[39] Llewellyn D. The economic rationale for financial regulation. FSA Occas. Pap. Financ. Regul. 1999;(April):1–58.