Published date: Jul 31 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 3rd International Conference on Business, Economics, and Sustainability Science (BESS 2023)

Pages: 539–551

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i21.16760

Nor Fatimah CHE SULAIMANn.fatimah@umt.edu.myFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu

Noorhaslinda Kulub ABDUL RASHIDFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu

Abdul Rahim RIDZUANFaculty of Business and Management, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Kampus Alor Gajah, KM 26 Jalan Lendu, 78000 Alor Gajah, Melaka

Hazman SAMSUDINFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu

Jumadil SAPUTRAFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu

Noorazeela Zainol ABIDINFaculty of Applied and Human Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Sg. Chuchuh, Arau, Jalan Wang Ulu, 01000 Kangar, Perlis

Noor Haslina MOHAMAD AKHIRFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu

Nor Ermawati HUSSAINFaculty of Business, Economics and Social Development, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, 21030 Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu

Malaysia has been experiencing rapid socioeconomic transition over many years and achieved remarkable socioeconomic development and economic growth in the last few decades. Basically, such growth and development brought significant improvements in the level of income of low- and middle-income households. However, the cost of living in Malaysia has increasingly become a serious economic issue due to the increase in inflation. This paper addresses the question of how the cost of living can affect household income and expenditure. The finding of this research is threefold. Firstly, the income gap between households is increasing every year. This implies that the program to increase the income of the lower-income group should be given priority so that national development can be felt by all levels of society to achieve the goal of inclusive national development. Secondly, the monthly income average of households shows a steady increase. However, B40 earnings growth needs to be improving greater as an effort to reduce the income gap between the highest with low- and medium-income groups. Thirdly, income growth for each household group is still greater than inflation. This shows that on average households can still cope with the burden of rising costs and thus deal with the cost of living depending on how they model their spending patterns. This study highlights that to address the cost of living problem, the policy or program planned by the government should touch three important elements of income, price, and spending patterns. Also, this study highlights that to address the cost of living problem, a holistic approach is essential. This study also proposes that each of the economic agents, the government, the private sector, and the households have their roles in economics to develop better economic welfare among society.

Keywords: cost of living, income, low-income, middle income, living standard, spending patterns

[1] Almas I, Johnsen AA. (2012). The Cost of Living in China: Implications for Inequality and Poverty. Discussion Paper 2012.

[2] Argente D, Lee M. Cost of Living Inequality during the Great Recession. SSRN. 2015;032:2015.

[3] Bank Negara Malaysia. (2015), Annual Report, retrieved from http://www.bnm.gov.my/

[4] Brewer M, O’Dea C. (2012). Measuring Living Standards with Income and Consumption: Evidence from the UK. Institutes for Social & Economic Research. March 2012.

[5] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (1989), Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS) 1989, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[6] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (1995), Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS) 1995, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[7] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2009), Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS) 2009, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[8] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2012), Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS) 2012, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[9] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2014), Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS) 2014, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[10] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2016), Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey (HIS) 2016, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[11] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2009), Household Expenditure Survey (HES) 2009, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[12] Department of Statistics Malaysia. (2012), Household Expenditure Survey (HES) 2012, retrieved from https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/

[13] Kurre JA. Differences in the cost of living across Pennsylvania’s 67 Counties. Harrisburg: The Center for Rural Pennsylvania; 2000. Retrieved from http://www.rural.palegislature.us/clr2000.pdf

[14] Latimaha R, Ismail NA, Bahari Z. (2017). Empirical Analysis of the Factors Influencing the Cost of Living in Malaysia using ARDL Approach. Paper presented at International Conference on Applied Economics and Policy, 21-22 August 2017, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

[15] Palmer M, Williams J, McPake B. (2016). The Cost of Disability in a Low Income Country. SSRN Electronic Journal, January 2016. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2856285.

[16] Stoyanava S, Tonkin R. (2018). An Expenditure-Based Approach to Poverty in the UK. IARIW General Conferences. August 20-25, 2018.