Published date: Jul 03 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Joint Seminar on Education, Social Science and Applied Science (IJESAS)

Pages: 221–232

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i19.16502

Sigit Sujatmikasujatmika@ustjogja.ac.idUniversitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Surakarta

Mohammad MasykuriUniversitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Surakarta

Baskoro Adi PrayitnoUniversitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Surakarta

Sutarno ‎ Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta, Surakarta

This research aims to develop an innovative learning model to cultivate students’ critical thinking skills. The formulated model is anchored in Problem-Based Learning (PBL) principles, a pedagogical approach highly endorsed by experts for its efficacy in enhancing critical thinking abilities. We endeavor to optimize the application of PBL to enhance the overall joyfulness of the learning experience. This research method uses DBR by Reeves, which includes: (1) identifying and analyzing problems by researchers and practitioners in collaboration, (2) development of solutions informed by existing design principles and technology innovation, (3) iterative cycles of testing and refinement of solutions in practice, and (4) reflection to produce “design principles” and enhance solution implementation in practice. Currently, the research is in stage two. In the first stage of DBR, the data were collected using a questionnaire to determine the obstacles to PBL from the teacher’s perspective and diagnostics of students’ critical thinking using tests. In stage two, we used a literature study to provide theoretical support for learning model developers. The research results are a draft of the Integrative Collaborative Problem Solving (ICoPS) learning model. We developed this model from the PBL and Jigsaw methods involving the TPACK approach. ICoPS syntax is a combination of the three constituent contents. ICoPS syntax includes (1) problem orientation, (2) formation of an expert group, (3) Jigsaw discussion, (4) investigation, (5) presenting of findings, and (6) evaluation. The syntax maximizes students’ critical thinking while maintaining ease and practicality when applied in the classroom.

Keywords: problem-based learning, jigsaw discussion, TPACK, critical thinking

[1] Ongardwanich N, Kanjanawasee S, Tuipae C. Development of 21st Century Skill Scales as Perceived by Students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;191:737–41.

[2] Silber-Varod V, Eshet-Alkalai Y, Geri N. Tracing research trends of 21st-century learning skills. Br J Educ Technol. 2019;50(6):3099–118.

[3] Qian M, Clark KR. Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Comput Human Behav. 2016;63:50–8.

[4] Niu L, Behar-Horenstein LS, Garvan CW. Do instructional interventions influence college students’ critical thinking skills? A meta-analysis. Educ Res Rev. 2013;9:114– 28.

[5] Griffin P, McGaw B, Care E. “Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills.,” Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. vol. 9789400723, pp. 1–345, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5.

[6] Chou TL, Wu JJ, Tsai CC. Research Trends and Features of Critical Thinking Studies in E-Learning Environments. RE:view. 2019.

[7] Sohaya EM. “Blended Learning and 4Cs: Trends in the New Normal Life of Education, Globalization and the Next Decade.,” vol. 488, no. Aisteel, pp. 77–81, 2020.

[8] Vieira RM, Tenreiro-Vieira C. Fostering Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking in Elementary Science Education. Int J Sci Math Educ. 2016;14(4):659–80.

[9] Rosen Y, Tager M. Making student thinking visible through a concept map in computer-based assessment of critical thinking. J Educ Comput Res. 2014;50(2):249–70.

[10] Cargas S, Williams S, Rosenberg M. An approach to teaching critical thinking across disciplines using performance tasks with a common rubric. Think Skills Creativity. 2017;26:24–37.

[11] Sujatmika S, Widyawati A, Ernawati T, Widhy P. “Gambier’s product (Uncaria gambir Roxb.) as learning material to enhance critical thinking,” AIP Conference Proceedings. vol. 050003, no. December, p. 2022.

[12] Cónsul-Giribet M, Medina-Moya JL. Strengths and weaknesses of Problem Based Learning from the professional perspective of registered nurses. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2014 Oct;22(5):724–30.

[13] Savery J. Overview Of Problem-based Learning : Devinition and Distinction Interdisciplinary. Journal Problem-based Learning. 2006;1(1):9–20.

[14] Plomp T, Nieveen N. “An Introduction to Educational Design Research.,” p. 2007.

[15] S. Kennedy-Clark, “Reflection: Research by design: Design-based research and the higher degree research student.,” Journal of Learning Design. vol. 8, no. 3, p. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5204/jld.v8i3.257.

[16] Amiel T, Reeves TC. Design-based research and educational technology: rethinking technology and the research agenda. J Educ Technol Soc. 2008;11(4):29–40.

[17] T. (SLO) Plomp and N. (SLO) Nieveen, “Educational Design Research. Educational Design Research; 2013. pp. 1–206.

[18] Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. “The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.,” The BMJ. vol. 372, p. 2021.

[19] Joice E. B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, Models of Teaching: Model-Model Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar; 2009.

[20] Hadi A, Brotopuspito K, Pramumijoyo S, Hardiyatmo H. Regional Landslide Potential Mapping in Earthquake-Prone Areas of Kepahiang Regency, Bengkulu Province, Indonesia. Geosciences (Basel). 2018;8(6):219.

[21] Retnawati H, Djidu H, Kartianom E. Apino, and R.D. Anazifa, “Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy,” Problems of Education in the 21st Century. vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 215–230, 2018.

[22] Choi E, Lindquist R, Song Y. Effects of problem-based learning vs. traditional lecture on Korean nursing students’ critical thinking, problem-solving, and self-directed learning. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jan;34(1):52–6.

[23] Kong LN, Qin B, Zhou YQ, Mou SY, Gao HM. The effectiveness of problem-based learning on development of nursing students’ critical thinking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 Mar;51(3):458–69.

[24] Khoiriyah U, Roberts C, Jorm C, Van der Vleuten CP. Enhancing students’ learning in problem based learning: validation of a self-assessment scale for active learning and critical thinking. BMC Med Educ. 2015 Aug;15(1):140.

[25] Sujatmika S, Irfan M, Ernawati T, et al. “Designing E-Worksheet Based On Problem- Based Learning To Improve Critical Thinking.,” In: International Conference of Internet of Things (ICSTI). EAI, Yogyakarta (2019). https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.19-10- 2018.2281282.

[26] Karacop A, Doymus K. Effects of Jigsaw Cooperative Learning and Animation Techniques on Students’ Understanding of Chemical Bonding and Their Conceptions of the Particulate Nature of Matter. J Sci Educ Technol. 2013;22(2):186–203.

[27] Slavin RE. “Cooperative learning teori, riset dan praktik.,” Bandung: Nusa Media. vol. 236, p. 2015.

[28] Komala E, Chandra E, Ubaidillah M. Meta-Analisis Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif (Cooperative Learning) Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2022;12(3):187.

[29] Winschel GA, Everett RK, Coppola BP, Shultz GV, Lonn S. Using Jigsaw-Style Spectroscopy Problem-Solving to Elucidate Molecular Structure through Online Cooperative Learning. J Chem Educ. 2015;92(7):1188–93.

[30] M. Hugerat, N. Kortam, F. Kassom, S. Algamal, and S. Asli, “Improving the Motivation and the Classroom Climate of Secondary School Biology Students Using Problem-Based – Jigsaw Discussion (PBL-JD) Learning.,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. vol. 17, no. 12, p. 2021. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11304.

[31] Hastini LY, Fahmi R, Lukito H. Apakah Pembelajaran Menggunakan Teknologi dapat Meningkatkan Literasi Manusia pada Generasi Z di Indonesia? [ JAMIKA]. Jurnal Manajemen Informatika. 2020;10(1):12–28.

[32] Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Cain W. What is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK)? J Educ. 2013;193(3):13–9.