KnE Social Sciences
ISSN: 2518-668X
The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.
Digital Era and Ethical Behavior: A Study of Determination Theory
Published date: Jun 04 2024
Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences
Issue title: 1st International Conference on Economic, Management, and Accounting (ICEMA)
Pages: 447–459
Authors:
Abstract:
Based on the moral paradigm of Self-Determination Theory (SDT), an organization should encourage individuals to maintain ethical behavior through an internalization process. This study captures the views of police department personnel about unethical behavior, namely corruption, especially corruption in a new digital-normal era. This study measures the internalization level of ethical behavior through salary satisfaction and locus of control. The study uses a questionnaire to reveal the internalization level of ethical behavior and police officers as respondents. Results show that ethical behavior is internalized in intrinsic motivation form. Therefore, this study contributes to a new paradigm of SDT (moral paradigm) and ethical practice by developing the self-belief of an officer in the new digital normal era.
Keywords: digital, new normal, self-determination theory, salary satisfaction, locus of control
References:
[1] Prabowo TL, Irwansyah I. Media Komunikasi Digital PolisiKu: Pelayanan Publik Polri kepada Masyarakat. J Stud Komun. 2018;2(3):382–402.
[2] Ghozali I. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. 5th ed. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro; 2011.
[3] Mulyadi M. Sistem Akuntansi. 5th ed. Yogyakarta: Bagian Penerbitan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi YKPN; 2001.
[4] Singh P, Loncar N. Pay Satisfaction, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover Intent. Ind Relat (Berkeley) [Internet]. 2020;65(3):470–90. Available from: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/044892ar
[5] Walgito B. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi; 2004. 246 pp.
[6] Sulistiyowati F. Pengaruh kepuasan gaji dan kultur organisasi terhadap persepsi aparatur pemerintah daerah tentang tindak korupsi. JAAI [Internet]. 2007;11(1):47– 66. Available from: https://journal.uii.ac.id/JAAI/article/view/388/303
[7] Lee HW. Locus of control, socialization, and organizational identification. Manage Decis. 2013;51(5):1047–55.
[8] Sirén C, Patel PC, Örtqvist D, Wincent J. CEO burnout, managerial discretion, and firm performance: the role of CEO locus of control, structural power, and organizational factors [Internet]. Long Range Plann. 2018;51(6):953–71.
[9] Hoffman M, Lyons E. Do Higher Salaries Lead to Higher Performance? Evidence from State Politicians. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2345085.
[10] Duttweiler PC. The Internal Control Index: A Newly Developed Measure of Locus of Control. Educ Psychol Meas. 1984;44(2):209–21.
[11] Sharan NN, Romano DM. The effects of personality and locus of control on trust in humans versus artificial intelligence [Internet]. Heliyon. 2020 Aug;6(8):e04572.
[12] Moran CM, Diefendorff JM, Kim TY, Liu ZQ. A Profile Approach to Self-Determination Theory Motivations at Work”. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 354 – 363 [Internet]. J Vocat Behav. 2012;81(3):354–63.
[13] Abraham J, Kurniadi MA, Andangsari EW, Ali MM, Manurung RH, Warnars HL. Prediction of guilt and shame proneness based on disruption to psychological contract: A new light for corruption prevention [Internet]. Heliyon. 2020 Jun;6(6):e04275.
[14] Lindgren I, Madsen CØ, Hofmann S, Melin U. Close encounters of the digital kind: A research agenda for the digitalization of public services [Internet]. Gov Inf Q. 2019;36(3):427–36.