Published date: May 30 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The 6th International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (ICOSSH VI)

Pages: 42–51

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i18.16327

Ira Febrinairafebrina67@gmail.comPublic Administration Doctoral Study Program, Faculty of Social & Political Sciences, Sriwijaya University, Palembang, South Sumatera

The aim of this research is to analyze the digital transformation strategy for managing motorcycle crime evidence at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office using the flow model in digital transformation, which includes digital resources, organizational structure, growth strategy, and metrics and goals. This study uses the literature review methodology. The results of the study show that the management of motorbike crime evidence at the Bandar Lampung District Prosecutor’s Office is still not optimal, as many crime evidences in the form of motorbikes are damaged or lost as a result of a lack of professional guarding. In addition, the management of evidence in the form of motorbikes still has many crucial problems, ranging from the number of incompatible units and problems with facilities and infrastructure to staff who are unprofessional and irresponsible in managing evidence properly. Given that the Bandar Lampung District Attorney’s evidence management is not optimal, it is imperative to move forward with the digital transformation of technology, which not only improves acceleration, convenience, and accuracy but also ensures that information is accessed by the public easily, transparently, objectively, and without convolution. Because the globe is now borderless, much like an aquarium, the Prosecutor’s Office is obligated to simplify and expedite access to information for the media and the public.

Keywords: digital transformation strategy, management of motorcycle crime evidence

[1] Lampung.rilis.id. Kalahkan Sumsel, Jumlah Sepeda Motor di Lampung Capai. 2021.

[2] tempo.co. Barang Bukti di Rupbasan Nyaris Jadi Rongsokan. Dec. 05, 2017.

[3] Nugoho H, Budiono B, Pranoto P. Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Aset Benda Sitaan Negara. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional LPPM Unsoed: Sumber Daya Perdesaan dan Kearifan Lokal; 2017. 6th ed., vol. 7.

[4] Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. SAGE Publications Inc; 2014.

[5] Hamzah A. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika; 2008.

[6] Beckers SF, van Doorn J, Verhoef PC. Good, better, engaged? The effect of companyinitiated customer engagement behavior on shareholder value. J Acad Mark Sci. 2018 May;46(3):366–83.

[7] Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Dong JQ, Fabian N, et al. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J Bus Res. 2021;122:889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

[8] Li F, Nucciarelli A, Roden S, Graham G. How smart cities transform operations models: A new research agenda for operations management in the digital economy. Prod Plann Contr. 2016 Apr;27(6):514–28.

[9] Ramaswamy V, Ozcan K. Brand value co-creation in a digitalized world: An integrative framework and research implications. Int J Res Mark. 2016 Mar;33(1):93–106.

[10] Leviäkangas P. Digitalisation of Finland’s transport sector. Technol Soc. 2016 Nov;47:1–15.

[11] Baraldi E, Nadin G. The challenges in digitalising business relationships. The construction of an IT infrastructure for a textile-related business network. Technovation. 2006 Oct;26(10):1111–26.

[12] Pagani M, Pardo C. The impact of digital technology on relationships in a business network. Ind Mark Manage. 2017 Nov;67:185–92.

[13] Sebastian IM, Ross JW, Beath C, Mocker M, Moloney KG, Fonstad NO. How big old companies navigate digital transformation. In: Strategic information management. Routledge; 2020. pp. 133–50.

[14] Verhoef PC, Broekhuizen T, Bart Y, Bhattacharya A, Dong JQ, Fabian N, et al. Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. J Bus Res. 2021 Jan;122:889–901.