Published date: Apr 26 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Models and Teaching Approaches

Pages: 660–666

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i13.15970

Khaluka Ahsana Fitrikhalukaahsanaf@upi.eduDepartment of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Dr. Setiabudhi Street No. 229, Bandung 40154, Indonesia

Sufyani PrabawantoDepartment of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Dr. Setiabudhi Street No. 229, Bandung 40154, Indonesia

Endang Cahya MulyaningDepartment of Mathematics Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Dr. Setiabudhi Street No. 229, Bandung 40154, Indonesia

Adaptive reasoning is one of the mathematical proficiency strands that refers to the capacity to reflect, explain, justify, and think logically about concepts and situations. It helps student construct their idea in solving mathematics problems. On the other hand, students’ adaptive reasoning still needs to be developed. This is a qualitative study with a case study design. This study was carried out to analyze students’ adaptive reasoning in solving Pythagoras Theorem problems based on gender. There were 31 student participants, of which 14 were males and 17 females. They were the second grade of senior high schools in South of Aceh. There were several steps involved in conducting this study, such as formulating and validating the problems, conducting the test, and interviewing. The problems were formulated based on the adaptive reasoning indicators and curriculum. They were then validated by two lecturers and a teacher. Furthermore, the test was carried out for 20 minutes for answering 4 problems. This study showed that female students were able to solve adaptive reasoning problems as compared to male students.

Keywords: adaptive reasoning, gender, solving Pythagoras theorem problems

[1] Kilpatrick J, Swafford J, Findell B. The strands of mathematical proficiency. Washington (DC): NATIONAL ACADEMY PRESS; 2001. p. 20418.

[2] Khusna AH, Yuwono I, Muksar M. “Pengembangan lembar kerja siswa (lks) berkarakteristik rme materi barisan dan deret untuk kelas x.,” Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan. vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 739–745, 2016.

[3] Literacy A, Lesgold AM, Welch-ross M. ”Improving adult literacy instruction options for practice and research”. 2012.

[4] Gusic M. “Investigating adaptive reasoning and strategic competence in Croatian mathematics education: the example of quadratic function.,” Towards new perspectives on mathematics education. p. 192, 2019.

[5] Ansari BI, Taufiq T, Saminan S. The use of creative problem solving model to develop students ’ adaptive reasoning ability: Inductive, deductive, and intuitive. International Journal on Teaching and Learning Mathematics. 2020;3(1):23–36.

[6] Mulyayunita A. “Analysis of students ’ adaptive reasoning in solving quadrilateral problem viewed by van hiele's thinking level,” pp. 323–328, 2019.

[7] Recber S, Isiksal M, Koç Y. Investigating self-efficacy, anxiety, attitudes and mathematics achievement regarding gender and school type. Volume 34. Anales de Psicología/Annals of Psychology; 2018. pp. 41–51.

[8] Wijaya A, van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M, Doorman M, Robitzsch A. Difficulties in solving context-based PISA mathematics tasks: an analysis of students’ errors. Mont Math Enthus. 2014;11(3):555–84.

[9] Fitri KA, Jupri A. “Students’ errors in solving the connection cluster problem: a case study on space and shape content,” In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series. pp. 12079. IOP Publishing (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012079.

[10] Riastuti N, Mardiyana M, Pramudya I. “Students errors in geometry viewed from spatial intelligence.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. vol. 895, no. 1, p. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012029.

[11] Lithner J. A research framework for creative and imitative reasoning. Educ Stud Math. 2008;67(3):255–76.

[12] Lithner J. Students’ mathematical reasoning in university textbook exercises. Educ Stud Math. 2003;52(1):29–55.

[13] Prabawanto S. “Students’ validations on their solution in mathematical problem solving,.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series. vol. 1157, no. 4, p. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042111.

[14] Herman T. Analysis of students’ mathematical reasoning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing; 2018.