Published date: Apr 26 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Models and Teaching Approaches

Pages: 449–459

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i13.15947

Ratna Yulis Tyaningsihratnayulis@unram.ac.idMathematics Education Department, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Majapahit 62, Mataram 83125, Indonesia

Arjudin .Mathematics Education Department, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Majapahit 62, Mataram 83125, Indonesia

Tabita Wahyu TriutamiMathematics Education Department, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Majapahit 62, Mataram 83125, Indonesia

Dwi NovitasariMathematics Education Department, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Majapahit 62, Mataram 83125, Indonesia

Ratih Ayu ApsariMathematics Education Department, Universitas Mataram, Jalan Majapahit 62, Mataram 83125, Indonesia

Providing opportunities by freeing students to explore learning mathematics is an implementation of creativity. In order to improve mathematical creativity, it is necessary to use an interdisciplinary approach to learning various mathematical concepts with the application of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) principles. This study aims to describe students’ mathematical creativity in learning with STEM context on practical problems of derivative applications by using the descriptive research analysis method. This study uses a qualitative approach with stages covering problem formulation, sample selection, research limitations, instrumentation, data collection and analysis, and conclusion. The subjects of this study were students of the 4D Mathematics Education Class with a sampling technique that was purposive sampling in terms of self-efficacy. The analytical techniques carried out for STEM learning were pretest, posttest, self-efficacy questionnaire, and student response questionnaires. The results of this study indicate that learning with the STEM approach can increase students’ mathematical creativity in solving practical problems of derivative applications. This shows that the STEM approach can equip students to be creative and resilient in dealing with various problems and changes that occur in the future.

Keywords: mathematical creativity, practical problems of derivative applications, stem

[1] Jefferson M, Anderson M. Transforming schools: creativity, critical reflection, communication, collaboration. Bloomsbury Publishing; 2017.

[2] Lian B. Giving creativity room to students through the friendly school’s program. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2018;7(7):1–7.

[3] Wang Y. On cognitive foundations of creativity and the cognitive process of creation [IJCINI]. Int J Cogn Inform Nat Intell. 2009;3(4):1–18.

[4] Fadipe EO, Obiana UV, Aishatu MZ. Creativity and innovation through technical and vocational education for sustainable family survival in Nigeria. Eur J Train Dev Stud. 2021;8(1):19–26.

[5] Fitriani W, Komalasari E, Adzhani M, Nelisma Y. Development of research-based modules in educational psychology lectures to improve creativity. Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. 2022;6(4):3050–62.

[6] Guilford JP, Vaughan AT. Factors that aid and hinder creativity. Teach Coll Rec. 1962;63(5):1–13.

[7] Jordanous A. Four PPP perspectives on computational creativity in theory and in practice. Connect Sci. 2016;28(2):194–216.

[8] Runco MA, Kim D. “Four ps of creativity and recent updates.,” In: Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Inovation and Entrepreneurship. pp. 996–1001. Springer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_429.

[9] Dhengre S, Mathur J, Oghazian F, Tan X, McComb C. Towards enhanced creativity in interface design through automated usability evaluation. In. ICCC; 2020. pp. 366–9.

[10] Karkockiene D. Creativity: can it be trained? a scientific educology of creativity. Online Submission. 2005;(1):51–8.

[11] Torrance EP. A longitudinal examination of the fourth grade slump in creativity. Gift Child Q. 1968;12(4):195–9.

[12] Kanematsu H, Barry DM. “Theory of creativity.,” STEM and ICT Education in Intellegent Environments. Springer; 2016. pp. 9–13.

[13] Maass K, Geiger V, Ariza MR, Goos M. The role of mathematics in interdisciplinary stem education. ZDM Math Educ. 2019;51(6):869–84.

[14] McDonald CV. STEM Education: A review of the contribution of the disciplines of science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Science Education International. 2016;27(4):530–69.

[15] Li Y, Schoenfeld AH. Problematizing teaching and learning mathematics as ‘given’ in stem education. Int J STEM Educ. 2019;6(1):44.

[16] UGRAS M. “The effects of stem activities on stem Attitudes, scientific creativity and motivation beliefs of the students and their views on stem education.” International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2018;10(5):2018.

[17] Root-Bernstein R. Arts and crafts as adjuncts to stem education to foster creativity in gifted and talented students. Asia Pac Educ Rev. 2015;16(2):203–12.

[18] Ulinnuha R, Rochmad R. “Creative thinking ability with open-ended problems based on self-efficacy in gnomio blended learning.” UNNES Journal of Mathematics Education Research. 2021;10(A):20–25.

[19] Sukestiyarno YL, Mashitoh NL, Wardono W. Analysis of students’ mathematical creative thinking ability in module-assisted online learning in terms of self-efficacy. Jurnal Didaktik Matematika. 2021;8(1):114–27.

[20] Hoffman B. ‘I think I can, but I’m afraid to try’: the role of self-efficacy beliefs and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learn Individ Differ. 2010;20(3):276–83.

[21] Pajares F. Self-efficacy beliefs and mathematical problem-solving of gifted students. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1996 Oct;21(4):325–44.

[22] Ramdass D, Zimmerman BJ. Effects of self-correction strategy training on middle school students’ self-efficacy, self-evaluation, and mathematics division learning. J Adv Academics. 2008;20(1):18–41.