Published date: Apr 26 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Models and Teaching Approaches

Pages: 97–109

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i13.15911

Tengku Idrisidris@upi.eduScience Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No 229 Bandung, 40154, Indonesia

Adi RahmatScience Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No 229 Bandung, 40154, Indonesia

Topik HidayatScience Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi No 229 Bandung, 40154, Indonesia

This literature review aimed to get an overview of metacognition research in learning biology in Indonesia. Data were taken from Biology Education journals that had been accredited by the Ministry of Education and Culture in 2023. 20 journals, consisting of Sinta 2 and Sinta 3, journals were analyzed. Within the journals, 43 research articles were analyzed. Some of the aspects analyzed were the type of research, research subjects, instruments used, data analysis methods, treatments used and themes or topics. Data analysis showed that the majority of research conducted was experimental research, followed by Korean research. The most researched subjects were high school students, followed by college and junior high school students. In metacognition research in Indonesia, researchers often used the MAI instrument, and it is not completely defined. T-test analysis was the most used means of processing data, followed by descriptive data processing in the form of percentages. The topics used in the research showed that all topics were suitable for training students’ metacognition.

Keywords: metacognition, research trend, MAI instrument

[1] Zohar A, Barzilai S. A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Stud Sci Educ. 2013;49(2):121–69.

[2] Perry J, Lundie D, Golder G. Metacognition in schools: what does the literature suggest about the effectiveness of teaching metacognition in schools? Educ Rev. 2019;71(4):483–500.

[3] Domokos S, Huey M. Simple metacognitive prompts for enhancing student learning: an interdisciplinary study. J Educ. 2023;203(1):113–7.

[4] Flavell J. Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. Am Psychol. 1979;34(10):906–91.

[5] Susetyarini E, Fauzi A. Trend of critical thinking skill research in biology education journals across Indonesia: from research design to data analysis. Int J Instr. 2020;13(1):535–50.

[6] Chety R, Friedmen JN, Rockof JE. Measuring the impact of teachers ii: teacher valueadded and student outcomes in adulthood. National Bereau of Economiic Research. 2013;135(4).

[7] Cheung AC, Slavin RE. How methodological features affect effect sizes in education. Educ Res. 2016;45(5):283–92.

[8] Masitoh U, Suganda O, Widiantie R. Pengaruh model pembelajaran discovery learning dengan alat peraga sederhana terhadap kemampuan metakognitif. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi. 2019;11(1):28. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v11i1.1510.

[9] Puspita L, Yetri Y, Novianti R. Pengaruh model pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dengan teknik mind mapping terhadap kemampuan metakognisi dan afektif pada konsep sistem sirkulasi kelas xi ipa di sma negeri 15 Bandar Lampung. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi. 2017;8(1):78–90.

[10] Habibi AA, Mustofa RF, Ardiansyah R. Perbandingan metakognitif pada peserta didik yang tinggal di asrama dan non asrama pada pembelajaran biologi. Bioma : Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi. 2021;10(1):69–79.

[11] Fajar N, Putri SK. Pengaruh penerapan service learning berbasis flipped classroom terhadap kesadaran metakognitif dan literasi sains siswa. BIOEDUSAINS: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi dan Sains. 2020;3(2):75–84. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v3i2.1584.

[12] Gopalan M, Rosinger K, Bin Ahn J. Use of quasi-experimental research designs in education research: growth, promise, and challenges. Rev Res Educ. 2020;44(1):218– 43.

[13] A. Rustininingsih, M. Saptasari, and Dahlia, “Pembelajaran biologi berbasis inkuiri untuk meningkatkan keterampilan metakognitif, pemahaman konsep, dan sikap ilmiah siswa kelas X sma.,”. Jurnal Pendidiikan Biologi. 2017;8(2):57–63.

[14] Aisyah S, Ridlo S. Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran jigsaw dan problem based learning terhadap skor keterampilan metakognitif siswa pada mata pelajaran biologi Info Artikel. Unnes Journal of Biology Education. 2015;4(1):50229.

[15] Purwaningsih SD, Mubarok I. Biological science curriculum study 5e model based on multiple representations in ecosystem materials on problem solving and metacognitive abilities. J Biol Educ. 2021;10(1):63–9.

[16] Wilis R, Prayitno BA, Sunarno W, Anjirawaroj S. Improving students’ metacognitive abilities and creative thinking skills through STEM-based in online learning [ Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia]. JPBI. 2023;9(1):90–102.

[17] Khidhir RJ. A Correlation Study of the Effectiveness of teaching practice between taught programs and personal in-built performance talents. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. 2021;3(3):41–50.

[18] Curtis EA, Comiskey C, Dempsey O. Importance and use of correlational research. Nurse Res. 2016 Jul;23(6):20–5.

[19] Antika LT, Sukron S, Haikal M, Farthir A. Metacognitive and creative thinking skills: A post-covid-19 correlational study. 2022;7(2):264–275.

[20] Lestari HN, Suganda O, Widiantie R. Hubungan antara pengetahuan metakognitif dengan kemampuan pemecahan masalah melalui model problem based learning (pbl) pada konsep pencemaran lingkungan di kelas x. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi. 2017;9(2):27. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v9i02.745.

[21] Helen L. Design : Descriptive research. 2015;1:154-157.

[22] Budiman WN, Marianti A. The effectiveness of the group investigation model with a jelajah alam sekitar approach to the metacognitive skills of high school students in animalia material. J Biol Educ. 2020;9(3):306–14.

[23] Pratama AT. Improving metacognitive skills using problem based learning (pbl) at natural science of primary school in deli serdang, indonesia. Biosfer. 2018;11(2):101– 7.

[24] Lysenko LV, Abrami PC, Bernard RM, Dagenais C. Research use in education: an online survey of school practitioners. Brock Education Journal. 2016;25(1).

[25] Joseph Check RK. Research design and data collection: survey research. Research Method in Education; 2011. pp. 159–85.

[26] Rizkia AM, Zulfiani Z. Fostering metacognitive skill: A means to improve students’ academic achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2021;10(1):24–31.

[27] Lin TC, Lin TJ, Tsai CC. Research trends in science education from 2008 to 2012: a systematic content analysis of publications in selected journals. Int J Sci Educ. 2014;36(8):1346–72.

[28] Egmir E, Erdem C, Koçyigit M. Trends in educational research: A content analysis of the studies published in international journal of instruction. Int J Instr. 2017;10(3):277– 94.

[29] Siegesmund A. Using self-assessment to develop metacognition and self-regulated learners. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2017 Jun;364(11):1–4.

[30] Anderson LW, Airasian KPW, K.A. Cruikshank, et al. Taxonomy for Assessing a Revision Bl00M’S Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. 2001.

[31] Zepeda CD, Nokes-Malach TJ. Assessing metacognitive regulation during problem solving: a comparison of three measures. Journal of Intelligence. 2023;11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11010016.

[32] de Vries JA, Dimosthenous A, Schildkamp K, Visscher AJ. The impact of an assessment for learning teacher professional development program on students’ metacognition. Sch Eff Sch Improv. 2023;34(1):109–29.

[33] Omidi M, Sridhar YN. Effectiveness of performance assessment on meta cognitive skills. J Educ Pract. 2012;3(10):7–12.

[34] Craig K, Hale D, Grainger C, Stewart ME. Evaluating metacognitive selfreports: systematic reviews of the value of self-report in metacognitive research. Metacognition Learn. 2020;15(2):155–213.

[35] Wicaksono AG, Corebima AD. Hubungan antara keterampilan metakognitif dan retensi siswa dalam strategi pembelajaran reciprocal teaching dipadu jigsaw di kelas x sman 7 Malang. Bioma. 2015;4(1):58–68.

[36] A.R. WICAKSONO. S. Widoretno, and N. Nurmiyati, “Pengaruh penggunaan modul berbasis research pada pembelajaran think pair share dan group investigation terhadap pemahaman konsep dan kemampuan metakognisi peserta didik kelas x sma negeri 1 boyolali tahun ajaran 2013/2014.,”. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2015;8(1):60.

[37] Putri WA, Prasetyo APB, Supriyanto. Pengaruh penerapan strategi metakognitif dalam metode inkuiri terhadap hasil belajar. J Biol Educ. 2012;1(3):266–71.

[38] Sholihah M, Sofiyana MS. Analisis kesadaran metakognitif bagi calon guru di universitas islam balitar. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2022;12(3):202.

[39] Anindya IA, Mahrus M, Hadiprayitno G. Hubungan kemampuan metakognisi siswa dengan hasil belajar ipa melalui penerapan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah di smp negeri 2 kuripan. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2019;10(2):66.

[40] Rahman A. Profil kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kemampuan metakognitif siswa berdasarkan jenis kelamin. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2018;10(1):28.

[41] Hermawan W, Abidin Z, Junaedi E. Peran gender dan kesadaran metakognitif siswa sma di kabupaten kuningan terhadap hasil belajar biologi. Quagga : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Biologi. 2018;10(2):12. https://doi.org/10.25134/quagga.v10i2.904.

[42] Handayani H, Widiantie R. Pre-services biology teachers: correlation of metacognition awareness with the ability to design experiments through vee diagram. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2020;13(1):143–54.

[43] Windasari C, Hasanuddin H. Pengaruh model guided discovery terhadap kesadaran metakognitif dan hasil belajar kognitif peserta didik pada materi sistem reproduksi manusia di mas babun najah Banda Aceh. BIOTIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi dan Kependidikan. 2017;4(1):66 https://doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v4i1.1072.

[44] Darmawan E, Brasilita Y, Zubaidah S, Saptasari M. Meningkatkan keterampilan metakognitif siswa berbeda gender dengan model pembelajaran simas eric di sman 6 Malang. Biosfer. 2018;11(1):48–57.

[45] Septina EP, Marianti A, Widiatningrum T. The use of science reflective journal writing by jas approach to train students metacognitive ability. J Biol Educ. 2018;7(3):244– 52.

[46] Septiyana K, Prasetyo AP, Chrisjanti W. Jurnal belajar sebagai strategi berpikir metakognitif pada pembelajaran sistem imunitas. Unnes Journal of Biology Education. 2013;2(1):1–9.

[47] Erlin E, Rahmat A, Redjeki S, Purwianingsih W. Analisis berbagai strategi dan model pembelajaran yang dapat memberdayakan kemampuan metakognitif pada pembelajaran biologi. Bioed : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2021;9(2):30.

[48] Setiawan D, Zubaidah S, Mahanal S. Minat baca dan keterampilan metakognitif pada pembelajaran biologi melalui model pembelajaran remap think pair share [ Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi]. JPBIO. 2020;5(1):88–95.

[49] Siswati BH, Hariyadi S, Corebima AD. Pengaruh model pembelajaran rqaad terhadap motivasi belajar dan keterampilan metakognitif mahasiswa mata kuliah strategi belajar mengajar biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2021;12(2):129.

[50] Tuzzahra DU, Rahmat A, Hamdiyati Y. Biology learning tasks variation during COVID- 19 pandemic and its effect on students’ self-efficacy [ Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia]. JPBI. 2022;8(3):226–35.

[51] Az-Zahra R, Rusdi R, Ristanto RH. Metacognitive, critical thinking, and concept understanding of motion systems: a correlational study. Bioedukasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 2021;14(2):156.

[52] Rahayu IP, Sukaesih S, FPMHB, The effectiveness of metacognition strategy by snowball throwing on student ’ s metacognition ability and learning outcomes on reproduction system material. J Biol Educ. 2020;9(2):86–91.

[53] Khairunnisa H, Azrai EP, Ristanto RH. The correlation between critical thinking skills with student metacognitive skills in ecosystem material. J Biol Educ. 2022;5(2):130.

[54] Eriawati E. Aplikasi keterampilan metakognitif dalam pembelajaran ekosistem di man Rukoh. BIOTIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Biologi Teknologi dan Kependidikan. 2015;1(1):60. https://doi.org/10.22373/biotik.v1i1.214.