Published date: Apr 26 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Models and Teaching Approaches

Pages: 32–38

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i13.15899

Mivtha Citraningrummivthacitraningrum@student.upi.eduScience Education Study Program, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. SetiabudiNo.229, Bandung, Indonesia

Yayan SanjayaScience Education Study Program, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. SetiabudiNo.229, Bandung, Indonesia

Fransisca SudargoScience Education Study Program, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. SetiabudiNo.229, Bandung, Indonesia

Riandi .Science Education Study Program, Sekolah Pascasarjana, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. SetiabudiNo.229, Bandung, Indonesia

This study aimed to identify the levels of understanding of prospective biology teacher students on the concept of invertebrates based on the cognitive process dimensions of Bloom’s Taxonomy. The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative. This research was conducted on 15 prospective biology teacher students. The instrument used was a multiple choice concept mastery test. Based on data analysis, the average cognitive ability of students is 69.10. The acquisition of conceptual understanding based on the dimensions of cognitive processes includes C1: 74,69; C2: 73.67; C3: 57.34; C4: 56.08, and C5: 22.34. The average score of cognitive ability showed that students’ cognitive abilities were still below the criteria for completeness set in the invertebrate zoology course.

Keywords: assessing, concept, understanding, abilities, prospective teachers, biology

[1] Santrock J. Educational Psychologi. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2011.

[2] Harminto SS, Nisyawati L. Modul Biologi Umum edisi 2. Universitas Terbuka. Tanggerang Selatan; 2019.

[3] Laidre ME. Foraging across ecosystems: diet diversity and social foraging spanning aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems by an invertebrate. Mar Ecol (Berl). 2013;34(1):80– 9.

[4] Bonada N, Dolédec S, Statzner B. Spatial autocorrelation patterns of stream invertebrates: exogenous and endogenous factors. J Biogeogr. 2012;39(1):56–68.

[5] Suwarman RF. Analisis tingkat kemampuan pemahaman konsep mahasiswa pada mata kuliah pemrograman komputer. PRISMA. 2018;7(2):227.

[6] Lestari PA, Gunawan G, Kosim K. Model pembelajaran discovery dengan pendekatan konflik kognitif berorientasi pada kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi. 2019;5(1):118–123. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v5i1.1161.

[7] Sulistyowati N, Widodo AT, Sumarni W. Efektivitas model pembelajaran guided discovery learning terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah kimia.Chemistry in. Chem Educ. 2012;2(1):48–55.

[8] Ihsan MS, Ramdani A, Hadisaputra S. Pengembangan e-learning pada pembelajaran kimia untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Pijar Mipa. 2019;14(2):84–7.

[9] Lovisia E. Pengaruh model pembelajaran inkuiri terbimbing terhadap hasil belajar [SPEJ]. Science and Physics Education Journal. 2018;2(1):1–10.

[10] Zulkarnain Z, Andayani Y, Hadisaputra S. Peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik pada pembelajaran kimia menggunakan model pembelajaran preparing dong concluding. Jurnal Pijar Mipa. 2019;14(2):96–100.

[11] Zaini M. Guided inquiry based learning on the concept of ecosystem toward learning outcomes and critical thinking skills of high school students.IOSR. Journal of Research & Method in Education. 2016;6(6):50–5.

[12] Anderson LW, D.R. Krathwohl DR. Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajara, pengajaran and assesmen. Yagyakarta: Pustaka Belajar; 2010.

[13] Widodo A. Taksonomi Bloom dan Pengembangan butir soal. Buletin Puspendik. 2006;3(2):18–29.

[14] Suparno P. Filsafat Konstruktivisme dalam Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Kanisius; 1996.

[15] Council NR. National science education standars. Washington (DC): National Academy Press; 1996.

[16] Lazonder AW, Harmsen R. Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of educational research. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366.