KnE Social Sciences

ISSN: 2518-668X

The latest conference proceedings on humanities, arts and social sciences.

The Relationship of Destination Attributes, Memorable Tourism Experiences, Satisfaction, and Revisit Intention

Published date: Apr 05 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: Brawijaya International Conference on Business Administration, Taxation, and Tourism (BICBATT 2023)

Pages: 441–452

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i11.15820

Authors:

Zulfa Richa Rahmawatizulfaricha@gmail.comBusiness Administration Department, Faculty of Administrative Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Andriani KusumawatiBusiness Administration Department, Faculty of Administrative Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

‎ SunartiBusiness Administration Department, Faculty of Administrative Science, University of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Abstract:

This paper is a systematic review of 20 previous articles that focuses on the relationship between destination attributes, memorable tourism experience, satisfaction, and revisit intention. This literature review includes journal articles that are relevant to the investigated keywords and research areas, published between 2013 and 2023. The main objective of this study is to present a comprehensive literature review focusing on destination attributes, memorable tourism experiences, satisfaction, and revisit intention. Through this review, a deeper understanding of the inter-relationships among these variables in the context of tourism can be achieved. The findings of this research have significant implications for the tourism industry and policymakers. By identifying key factors that influence tourist preferences, service providers can gain valuable insights into effectively managing tourism destinations, enhancing competitiveness, and boosting revenue. Furthermore, this literature review serves as a valuable reference for future research endeavors, offering valuable insights into exploring the intricate connections between destination attributes, memorable tourism experiences, satisfaction, and revisit intention. Future research is expected to further explore the role and contribution of stakeholders in creating environments and services that support a memorable tourism experience and increase revisit intention. In addition, future research can also investigate the relationship of these variables to various types of tourism.

Keywords: destination attributes, memorable tourism experience, satisfaction, revisit intention

References:

[1] WTTC. 2023. Economic impact research. https://wttc.org/research/economic-impact

[2] Kanwel S, Lingqiang Z, Asif M, Hwang J, Hussain A, Jameel A. The influence of destination image on tourist loyalty and intention to visit: Testing a multiple mediation approach. Sustainability (Basel). 2019;11(22):6401.

[3] Cibinskiene A, Snieskiene G. Evaluation of city tourism competitiveness. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2015;213:105–10.

[4] Whyte LJ, Packer J, Ballantyne R. Cruise destination attributes: Measuring the relative importance of the onboard and onshore aspects of cruising. Tour Recreat Res. 2018;43(4):470–82.

[5] Zhou X, Wong JW, Wang SA. Memorable tourism experiences in red tourism: The Case of Jiangxi, China. Front Psychol. 2022 Jul;13:899144.

[6] Hosseini S, Cortes-Macías R, Almeida-García F. Extending the memorable tourism experience construct: an investigation of tourists’ memorable dark experiences. J Vacat Mark. 2022;:1–24.

[7] Bigne E, Fuentes-Medina ML, Morini-Marrero S. Memorable tourist experiences versus ordinary tourist experiences analysed through user-generated content. J Hosp Tour Manag. 2020;45:309–18.

[8] Obradović S, Stojanović V, Tešin A, Šećerov I, Pantelić M, Dolinaj D. Memorable tourist experiences in national parks: Impacts on future intentions and environmentally responsible behavior. Sustainability (Basel). 2023;15(1):547.

[9] Hashemi S, Marzuki A, Kiumarsi S. Psychological motivations on the revisit intention of international student travels to Malaysia’s neighbouring countries. International Journal of Knowledge Management in Tourism and Hospitality. 2017;1(3):360.

[10] Johari SI, Anuar NA. Appraising the role of memorable tourism experience between the relationship of destination image and Melaka Domestic Tourists’ Revisit Intention. Malaysia Journal of Tourism [ JTHCA]. Hospitality & Culinary Arts. 2019;12(1):136–57.

[11] Sthapit E, Björk P, Coudounaris DN. Towards a better understanding of memorable wellness tourism experience. International Journal of Spa and Wellness. 2023;6(1):1– 27.

[12] Snyder H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J Bus Res. 2019;104(August):333–9.

[13] Rowe F. What literature review is not: Diversity, boundaries and recommendations. Eur J Inf Syst. 2014;23(3):241–55.

[14] Chen G, So KK, Hu X, Poomchaisuwan M. Travel for affection: A stimulus-organismresponse model of honeymoon tourism experiences. J Hosp Tour Res (Wash DC). 2022;46(6):1187–219.

[15] Mahdzar M, Shuib A, Ramachandran S, Herman Mohammad Afandi S. The role of destination attributes and memorable tourism experience in understanding tourist revisit intentions. Tourism & Environment. Social and Management Sciences. 2015;15:32–9.

[16] Karasakal S, Albayrak T. How to create flow experience during travel: The role of destination attribute. J Vacat Mark. 2022;28(3):303–18.

[17] Che C, Koo B, Wang J, Ariza-Montes A, Vega-Mu noz A, Han H. Promoting rural tourism in inner Mongolia: Attributes, satisfaction, and behaviors among sustainable tourists. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr;18(7):3788.

[18] Simpson GD, Sumanapala DP, Galahitiyawe NW, Newsome D, Perera P. Exploring motivation, satisfaction and revisit intention of ecolodge visitors. Tour Hosp Manag. 2020;26(2):359–79.

[19] La A, Batra A. The antecedent of revisit intention of domestic honeymoon tourists to Phuket. Dusit Thani College Journal. 2021;15(2):361–80.

[20] Tsai YF, Lin YC, Liou YH. 2022. Effects of memorable tourism experience on tourist’s satisfaction and revisiting: Case of Cittaslow in Taiwan. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478), 10(7), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v10i7.1446.

[21] Sharma P, Nayak JK. Understanding memorable tourism experiences as the determinants of tourists’ behaviour. Int J Tour Res. 2019;21(4):504–18.

[22] Melón MP, Fandos-Herrera C, Sarasa RG. Analysis of antecedents and consequences of memorable tourist experiences (MTEs): A Spanish Case Study. J Vacat Mark. 2021;27(3):346–60.

[23] Cifci I. Testing self-congruity theory in Bektashi Faith Destinations: The roles of memorable tourism experience and destination attachment. J Vacat Mark. 2022;28(1):3–19.

[24] Zhang H, Wu Y, Buhalis D. A model of perceived image, memorable tourism experiences and revisit intention. J Destin Marketing Manag. 2018;8:326–36.

[25] Hu Y, Xu S. Memorability of a previous travel experience and revisit intention: the three-way interaction of nostalgia, perceived disappointment risk and extent of change. J Destin Marketing Manag. 2021;20:100604.

[26] Tiwari S, Rosak-Szyrocka J, Żywiołek J. Internet of things as a sustainable energy management solution at tourism destinations in India. Energies. 2022;15(7):2433.

[27] Chen H, Rahman I. Cultural Tourism: An analysis of engagement, cultural contact, memorable tourism experience and destination loyalty. Tour Manag Perspect. 2018;26:153–63.

[28] Cheng W, Tsai H, Chuang H, Lin P, Ho T. How can emerging event sustainably develop in the tourism industry? From the perspective of the S-O-R Model on a two-year empirical study. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(23):1–18.

[29] Rehman AU, Shoaib M, Javed M, Abbas Z, Nawal A, Zámečník R. Understanding revisit intention towards religious attraction of Kartarpur Temple: Moderation analysis of religiosity. Sustainability (Basel). 2022;14(14):1–19.

[30] Soonsan N, Sukahbot S. Testing the role of country and destination image effect on satisfaction and revisit intentions among Western travellers. Afr J Hosp Tour Leis. 2019;8(4):1–14.

[31] Singh A, Tiwari R. The role of destination attributes in promoting a tourist destination. Pacific Business Review International. 2016;8(10):9–20.

[32] Srivastava M, Fernandes S. Market segmentation by preferred destination attributes an empirical study on religious tourists. Journal of Hospitality Application & Research. 2021;16(1):37–66. Available from: https://search.ebscohost.com/login. aspx?direct=true&db=bsh&AN=150423047&site=ehost-liv

[33] Pattiyagedara SS, Fernando PI. Rural tourism niche-market as a development strategy on rural community: Reference to Hiriwadunna Village Track, Meemure and Heeloya Knuckles Valley Tourism Village, Sri Lanka. Sri Lanka Journal of Management Studies. 2020;2(1):87–103.

[34] Gohary A, Pourazizi L, Madani F, Chan EY. 2020. Examining Iranian Tourists’ memorable experiences on destination satisfaction and behavioral intentions. In Current Issues in Tourism (Vol. 23, Issue 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2018.1560397.

[35] Chen X, Cheng Zfeng Kim GB. Make it memorable: Tourism experience, fun, recommendation and revisit intentions of Chinese outbound tourists. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(5):1–24.

[36] Saayman M, Li G, Uysal M, Song H. Tourist satisfaction and subjective well-being: An Index Approach. Int J Tour Res. 2018;20(3):388–99.

[37] Pratminingsih S. Roles of motivation and destination image in predicting tourist revisit intention: A case of Bandung – Indonesia. Int J Innov Manag Technol. 2014;5(1): https://doi.org/10.7763/IJIMT.2014.V5.479.

[38] Shi YP. 2021. The influence of consumer affinity on revisit intention over time: A case study Chinese Tourists’ Perception of Thailand. E3S Web of Conferences, 251, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125101012.

[39] Ramli MF, Rahman MA, Ling OM. Do motivation and destination image affect tourist revisit intention to Kinabalu National Park During Covid-19 Pandemic Recovery phase? Eur J Mol Clin Med. 2020;7(6):1624–35.

[40] Loureiro SM, Romero J, Bilro RG. Stakeholder engagement in co-creation processes for innovation: A systematic literature review and case study. J Bus Res. 2020;119:388–409.

Download
HTML
Cite
Share
statistics

252 Abstract Views

387 PDF Downloads