Published date: Mar 22 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Engineering Management and Sustainable Innovative Technology (ICEMSIT)

Pages: 292–304

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i10.15735

Nova Charisma Vindiantri Verochanovacharisma12@student.ub.ac.idUniversity of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

‎ WisnumurtiUniversity of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

Kartika Puspa NegaraUniversity of Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia

In general, the completion of a project must be in accordance with a binding contract agreement, but in its implementation, there can be obstacles that cause delays. Project delays can affect the results of weekly progress and the final results of the project and affect the performance appraisal of project implementers. Delays can be seen through the weekly progress of the program according to the schedule. Delays can be prevented by speeding up existing scheduling. This research aimed to conduct an acceleration analysis on the schedule using the fast track method and the crashing method and critical network analysis using the Precedent Diagram (PDM), then determine which method is appropriate according to this research. In this case study, there was a delay in the 18th week where the progress of the plan of 16.60% was only at 11.21% so there was a deviation of 5.4%. This delayed the duration of project completion from 366 days to 390 days. The analysis results obtained by applying the Fast-Track method can overcome delays by returning the schedule to the original plan, without any additional costs. The results of the analysis using the PDM method combined with the crashing method can make the duration faster than the plan duration, which was 359 days or 7 working days faster and the additional cost is about 1.02%. The fast track and crashing methods can be used as scheduling acceleration tools to overcome delays, but in financing, the fast track method is more cost-effective while the crashing method has additional costs. This research provides references and descriptions about the effects of using the fast track and crashing methods on projects.

Keywords: project delays, schedule acceleration, critical network analysis

[1] Moazzami M, Dehghan R, Ruwanpura JY. Contractual Risks in Fast-Track Project. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2011. pp. 2552–7.

[2] Cho K, Astak M. Time and Cost-Optimized Decision Support Model for Fast-Track Project. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2013;139(1):90-101. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000570.

[3] Ballesteros-Perez B. Modelling the boundaries of Project Fast-Tracking. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2017. pp. 231–41.

[4] Utomo AC, Widjatmiko I, Anwar MR. The Method of Modified Fast-track for the Acceleraction of the Highways Construction Project Schedule. India: IRJAES; 2019. pp. 155–61.

[5] Ballesteros-Perez P, Elamrousy KM, Gonzales-Cruz C. Non-linear Time-cost Tradeoff Models of Activity Crashing: Application to Construction Schedulling and Project Compression with Fast-tracking. Netherlands: Elsevier; 2018. pp. 229–40.

[6] Khinasih AP. Evaluation of Time and Cost with Crashing Method at UII Hospital Construction Project. Faculty of Civil and Planning Engineering, University of Islamic Indonesia; 2018.

[7] Stefanus Y, Wijatmiko I, Suryo E A. Analisis percepatan waktu penyelesaian proyek menggunakan metode fast-track dan crash program. Jurnal Media Teknik Sipil 2017;15:1693–3035.