Published date: Apr 03 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Materials and Modules

Pages: 814–822

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i8.15655

Wawan Setiawanwawans@upi.eduDepartment of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung 40154, Indonesia

Sugianto .Universitas Wiralodra, Jl. Ir. H. Juanda, Indramayu 4521, Indonesia

Riandi .Department of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung 40154, Indonesia

Yogi PrasetyoDepartment of Science Education, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Setiabudhi 229, Bandung 40154, Indonesia

Virtual laboratory is one of the solutions that can be used for practical or experimental activities in the context of independent learning on an independent campus, which is carried out outside the laboratory, especially during the Covid-19 pandemic. However, in practice, there are several obstacles so the use of virtual laboratories has not been massive. This study aims to analyze the student’s perspective on the virtual laboratory in forcing conditions during the Covid-19 pandemic. The research method uses a survey with a questionnaire technique to capture the perspectives of students of the Biology Education Study Program at one of the universities in West Java. The perspectives studied include innovation, urgency, usefulness, and motivation which are grouped into positive and negative perspectives. The results showed that most of the students had a positive perspective on the virtual laboratory by 81.64%, and a negative perspective of 18.36%. Among the four indicators, motivation is the smallest positive perspective although it is larger than the negative perspective. This research can give the conclusion that the virtual laboratory needs to be continuously developed along with the improvement of students’ technological skills or literacy.

Keywords: technology empowerment, student perspective study, virtual laboratory, independent learning

[1] Rahman D, Adlim A, Mustanir M. Analisis kendala dan alternatif solusi terhadap pelaksanaan praktikum kimia pada slta negeri Kabupaten Aceh Besar [Indonesian Journal of Science Education]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia. 2015;3(2):1–13.

[2] Duban N, Aydogdu B, Yüksel A. Classroom teachers’ opinions on science laboratory practices. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 2019;7(3):772–80.

[3] Redel-Macías MD, Pinzi S, Martínez-Jiménez MP, Dorado G, Dorado MP. Virtual laboratory on biomass for energy generation. J Clean Prod. 2016;112:3842–51.

[4] Estriegana R, Medina-Merodio JA, Barchino R. Student acceptance of virtual laboratory and practical work: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Comput Educ. 2019;135:1–14.

[5] Asiksoy G, Islek D. The impact of the virtual laboratory on students’ attitudes in a general physics laboratory. International Journal of Online Engineering. 2017;13(4):20–8.

[6] Herga NR, Cagran B, Dinevski D. Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2016;12(3):593–608.

[7] Salehi A, Jimenez-Berni J, Deery DM, Palmer D, Holland E, Rozas-Larraondo P, et al. SensorDB: a virtual laboratory for the integration, visualization and analysis of varied biological sensor data. Plant Methods. 2015 Dec;11(1):53.

[8] Rachman A, Setiawan MA, Putro HY. The implementation of independent learningindependent campus in the guidance and counseling study program. Bisma The Journal of Counseling. 2022;6(1):56–65.

[9] Oktaviani EI, Kadaritna N, Rosilawati I. “Pengembangan virtual lab untuk praktikum penurunan titik beku dan tekanan osmotik larutan.,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Kimia. vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 203–214, 2016.

[10] Klentien U, Wannasawade W. Development of blended learning model with virtual science laboratory for secondary students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016;217(2):706– 11.

[11] S.S. Alneyadi, “Virtual lab implementation in science literacy: emirati science teachers’ perspectives,.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. vol. 15, no. 12, p. 2019. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109285.

[12] Havlícková V, Šorgo A, Bílek M. Can virtual dissection replace traditional handson dissection in school biology laboratory work? Eurasia J Math Sci Technol Educ. 2018;14(4):1415–29.

[13] Diwakar S, Achuthan K, Nedungadi P, Nair B. Enhanced facilitation of biotechnology education in developing nations via virtual labs: analysis, implementation and casestudies. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering. 2011;3(1):1–8.