Published date: Apr 03 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Materials and Modules

Pages: 468–481

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i8.15583

Rama Nida Siregarramanidasiregar@upi.eduDepartment of Mathematics Education, Doctoral Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Nomor 229, Bandung, Indonesia

Didi SuryadiDepartment of Mathematics Education, Doctoral Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Nomor 229, Bandung, Indonesia

Sufyani PrabawantoDepartment of Mathematics Education, Doctoral Program, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Nomor 229, Bandung, Indonesia

Abdul Mujib .Department of Mathematics Education, Universitas Muslim Nusantara Al-Washliyah

There are many studies on technology-supported learning based on cooperative learning in the literature. However, little is known about Autograph-assisted think pair share learning in supporting students’ problem-solving abilities for learning in today’s technological era. This study aims to examine and analyze the differences in the improvement of students’ problem-solving abilities who participate in think pair share learning assisted by Autograph (Auto-TPS) and conventional learning assisted by Autograph (Auto-CL). This study uses quantitative methods with the design used in this study is a nonequivalent control group design involving two groups of students. The sample of this study was 70 students of class IX SMP Al Ulum Medan, Indonesia. Questions to test students’ mathematical problem-solving skills found five items. Data analysis includes data processing of test results, namely normality test, homogeneity test, hypothesis testing, and average difference test in the two groups using t-test. The conclusion of this study is that students who study with Auto-TPS get a higher increase in problem-solving abilities compared to students who learn with Auto-CL, with the explanation that the group of students who study Auto-TPS is very good when compared to the group student learning Auto-CL. Research findings related to the application of Auto-TPS can be an alternative learning model in the current technology-era learning situation.

Keywords: autograph, mathematics, problem-solving abilities, think pair share learning

[1] Nguyen M, Chang A, Micciche E, Meshulam M, Nastase SA, Hasson U. Teacherstudent neural coupling during teaching and learning. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2022 Apr;17(4):367–76.

[2] Troutman AP, Lichtenberg BK. Mathematics: A good beginning strategies for teaching children. 2nd ed. California: Cole Publishing Company; 1982.

[3] Bahl HC, Hunt RG. Problem-solving strategies for DSS design. Inf Manage. 1985;8(2):81–8.

[4] Benmesbah O, Lamia M, Hafidi M. An enhanced genetic algorithm for solving learning path adaptation problem. Educ Inf Technol. 2021;26(5):5237–68.

[5] Althuizen N, Wierenga B. Supporting creative problem solving with a case-based reasoning system. J Manage Inf Syst. 2014;31(1):309–40.

[6] Arifin MB, Sholeh M, Hafiz A, Agustin RD, Wardana MD. Developing interactive mobile mathematics inquiry to enhance students’ problem-solving skill [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2021;15(01):24.

[7] Becker DF, Forsyth RA. Chapter 5 Gender differences in mathematics problem solving and science: A longitudinal analysis. Int J Educ Res. 1994;21(4):407–16.

[8] Cai J. A protocol-analytic study of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Math Educ Res J. 1994;6(2):166–83.

[9] Chen YW, Chang WH, Kuo CC. A comparative study of the divergent problem solving abilities of mathematically and scientifically talented students and nongifted students. Think Skills Creativity. 2016;22:247–55.

[10] Irma A, Juandi D, Dahlan JA, Nirawati R. The effect of think-pair-share cooperative learning on student mathematical communication skills. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1521(3):032033.

[11] Cooper F. A modification of think pair share to make it more learner-centered by using student-generated questions. Coll Teach. 2018;66(1):34–34.

[12] Flora P, Raja P, Mahpul. Raja, and Mahpul, “Discovery learning strategy: integrating think-pair-share and teacher’s corrective feedback to enhance students’ writing language accuracy,”. International Journal of Education and Practice. 2020;8(4):733– 45.

[13] Mundelsee L, Jurkowski S. Think and pair before share: effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation. Learn Individ Differ. 2021;88:102015.

[14] Wong D. Active learning in osteopathic education: evaluation of think-pair-share in an undergraduate pathology unit. Int J Osteopath Med. 2022;43:63–70.

[15] Ningsih Y, Andika R, Sari IK, Ahmad S, Kenedi AK. The application think pair share in learning mathematic. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1321(2):022092.

[16] Kurjum M, Muhid A, Thohir M. Think-pair-share model as solution to develop students’ critical thinking in islamic studies: is it effective? Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan. 2020;39(1):144–55.

[17] Muiawan W. Effectiveness of biology learning using cooperative learning methods type TPS (think, pair, share) against student achievement. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1539(1):012051.

[18] Baya’a N, Daher W. Mathematics Teachers’ Readiness to Integrate ICT in the Classroom: The Case of Elementary and Middle School Arab Teachers in Israel [iJET]. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2013;8(1):46–52.

[19] Kozlov A, Tamer O, Bondarovskaya L, Lapteva S. Improving the project risk competence using m-learning: A case of bachelors in technical fields [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2020;14(21):107.

[20] Oyelere SS, Suhonen J, Sutinen E. M-Learning: A new paradigm of learning ICT in Nigeria [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2016;10(1):35– 44.

[21] A.L. Goodwin, E.L. Low, P.T. Ng, A. Yeung, and L. Cai, “Enhancing playful teachers’ perception of the importance of ICT use in the classroom: The role of risk taking as a mediator,.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education. vol. 40, no. 40, p. 2015. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2015v40n4.8.

[22] Tran T, Phan HA, Van Le H, Nguyen HT. ICT integration in developing competence for pre- service mathematics teachers: A case study from six universities in Vietnam [iJET]. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(14):19.

[23] Aigerim B, Aida S, Tulebike K. Investigating of information and communication technology (ICT) skills and professionally-based competencies of translator candidates. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. 2022;10(4):894–917.

[24] Maharaj-Sharma R, Sharma A, Sharma A. Using ICT-based instructional technologies to teach science: perspectives from teachers in Trinidad and Tobago. Aust J Teach Educ. 2017;42(10):23–35.

[25] Galustyan OV, Vyunova NI, Komarova EP, Shusharina ES, Gamisonija SS, Sklyarova ON. Formation of media competence of future teachers by means of ICT and mobile technologies [iJIM]. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies. 2019;13(11):184.

[26] Saha J, Ahmmed S, Ali M, Tamal MA, Rezaul KM. ICT based mathematics skill development program: an initiative to overcome mathematics anxiety [iJET]. Int J Emerg Technol Learn. 2020;15(14):252.

[27] Ridha M, Johar R, Marwan, Mailizar. R. Johar, Marwan, and Mailizar, “The effectiveness of an autograph-assisted problem based learning model for improving high school students’ learning outcome on graphics functions,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1088:012025.

[28] Zubainur CM, Suhartati, Iwannitona. C.M. Zubainur, Suhartati, and Iwannitona, “The practicality of the quadratic function module by utilizing autograph software and angry birds game.,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2018;1088:012042.

[29] Ticaya M, Ikhsan M, Yusrizal. Ikhsan, and Yusrizal, “Students’ learning outcome through the implementation of guided inquiry learning model using Autograph,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2020;1460(1):012043.

[30] Kristianti Y, Prabawanto S, Suhendra S. Critical thinking skills of students through mathematics learning with ASSURE model assisted by software autograph. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;895:012063.

[31] Creswell J. Educational research planning, implementation, and evaluation of qualitative and quantitative research. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar; 2015.

[32] Darmadi H. Educational research methods. Bandung: Alfabeta; 2011.

[33] Drew CJ, Hardman ML, Hosp JL. Educational research: Designing and carrying out research in the field of education. Jakarta: Permata Puri Media; 2017.

[34] Defranco-tommarello J, Deek FP. Collaborative problem solving and groupware for software development. Inf Syst Manage. 2006;21(1):67–80.

[35] Werdiningsih I, Budiyono, Pratiwi H. Budiyono, and H. Pratiwi, “Think pair share (TPS) model using science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) approach in mathematics learning.,”. J Phys Conf Ser. 2019;1306(1):012024.

[36] Druva-Roush CA. Chapter 4 Gender differences in comprehension skills used in mathematical problem-solving by math-anxious and non-math-anxious students. Int J Educ Res. 1994;21(4):399–406.

[37] Shih YC, Reynolds BL. Teaching adolescents EFL by integrating Think-Pair-Share and Reading strategy instruction: A quasi-experimental study. RELC J. 2015;46(3):221–35.