Published date: Mar 19 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: IAPA 2023 Annual International Conference

Pages: 572–589

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i7.15531

Kamaruddin .Public Administration Department, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Syed Agung Afandisyedagungafandi@uinsuska.ac.idPublic Administration Department, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

The central role of the Indonesian government in campaigning for open government is not in line with the findings of corruption cases in Indonesia. This research aims to analyze anti-corruption open government bibliometrics and the content of Indonesia’s open government anti-corruption policies. This research uses a qualitative approach with bibliometric analysis and content analysis methods. This study analyzes 200 papers on the Google Scholar database published in the 2018–2022 period and analyzes Indonesia’s open government anti-corruption policies. This research found 4587 citations, h-index 37, g-index 57, 172 keywords, 22 clusters, 2531 total link strengths, and 784 occurrences in open government anti-corruption papers. Anticorruption, data disclosure, open data, open government, e-government, information disclosure, transparency, open government data, public procurement, and beneficial ownership are the most popular open government anti-corruption trends. In the same time period, the Indonesian government established 10 anti-corruption policies covering public procurement, beneficial ownership, and elections. This research concludes that although the Indonesian government’s corruption index is unsatisfactory, anticorruption policies in Indonesia are in line with global anti-corruption trends, especially in several popular policies such as open data, transparency, information disclosure, public procurement, and beneficial ownership.

Keywords: anti-corruption, open government Indonesia, bibliometric analysis, content analysis

[1] S. A. Afandi, M. Afandi, and R. Erdayani, Pengantar Teori Pembangunan. Yogyakarta: Bintang Semesta Media, 2022.

[2] C. H. Park and K. Kim, “E-government as an anti-corruption tool: panel data analysis across countries,” Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 453–463, 2019.

[3] R. Matheus and M. Janssen, “A Systematic Literature Study to Unravel Transparency Enabled by Open Government Data: The Window Theory,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 503–534, 2020.

[4] Y. S. Babu, “Freedom of Information As Democracy: A Global Perspective on Corruption & Open Government,” Int. J. Soc. Sci. Econ. Res., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 4821– 4829, 2019.

[5] K. Karinda, A. Agustang, and A. Usman, “Digital Government for Anti Corruption: A Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Sci. Soc., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 199–219, 2023.

[6] C. Chen and S. Ganapati, “Do Transparency Mechanisms Reduce Government Corruption? A Meta-Analysis,” Int. Rev. Adm. Sci., vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 341–365, 2021.

[7] R. Erdayani, M. Afandi, and S. A. Afandi, “Bibliometric Analysis of Open Government: A Study on The Open Government Partnership,” Indo-Fintech Intellectuals J. Econ. Bus., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 276–294, 2023.

[8] S. A. Afandi, M. Afandi, and M. F. Anugerah, Open Government. Kediri: Kreator Cerdas Indonesia, 2023.

[9] E. Ruijer, F. Détienne, M. Baker, J. Groff, and A. J. Meijer, “The Politics of Open Government Data: Understanding Organizational Responses to Pressure for More Transparency,” Am. Rev. Public Adm., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 446–456, 2019.

[10] J. R. Gil-Garcia, M. Gasco-Hernandez, and T. A. Pardo, “Beyond Transparency, Participation, and Collaboration? A Reflection on the Dimensions of Open Government,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 483–502, 2020.

[11] S. A. Afandi, R. Erdayani, and M. Afandi, “Open Government: A Bibliographic Study of The Semarang and Gwangju Experiences,” J. Din. Pemerintah., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 217–234, 2023.

[12] R. G. Zulfa and S. A. Afandi, “Analisis Open Government Pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kota Pekanbaru,” J. Indragiri Penelit. Multidisiplin, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2023.

[13] M. Afandi and S. A. Afandi, Implikasi Tata Kelola Sektor Publik Era Reformasi. Palembang: Tunas Gemilang, 2018.

[14] S. A. Afandi, M. Afandi, R. Erdayani, and N. H. Afandi, “Indonesia’s Open Government: A Bibliometric Analysis,” J. Gov. Soc. Policy, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2023.

[15] A. Ingrams, S. Piotrowski, and D. Berliner, “Learning from Our Mistakes: Public Management Reform and the Hope of Open Government,” Perspect. Public Manag. Gov., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 257–272, 2020.

[16] S. Sidik and N. A. Ibrahim, “Legal Policy of Anti-Corruption Supervisor Design: A New Anti-Corruption Model in Indonesia,” Bestuur, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137–158, 2022.

[17] M. Rizki and K. D. Solihati, “The Impact of Corruption, Inflation and Unemployment Towards Poverty In Indonesia,” J. Bus. Adm. Econ. Entrep., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 47–56, 2022.

[18] N. R. Putra and R. Linda, “The Effect of E-Procurement Policy on Corruption in Government Procurement: Evidence from Indonesia,” Integritas J. Antikorupsi, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2022.

[19] U. Kulsum et al., “A Bibliometric Analysis of Open Government: Study on Indonesia and Philippines,” J. Gov., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 133–143, 2022.

[20] M. Gaviria-Marin, J. M. Merigó, and H. Baier-Fuentes, “Knowledge Management: A Global Examination Based on Bibliometric Analysis,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 140, no. 12, pp. 194–220, 2019.

[21] V. Wang and D. Shepherd, “Exploring The Extent of Openness of Open Government Data – A Critique of Open Government Datasets in the UK,” Gov. Inf. Q., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1035–1050, 2020.

[22] R. Subedi, T. E. Nyamasvisva, and M. Pokharel, “An Integrated-Based Framework For Open Government Data Adoption In Kathmandu,” Webology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 7936–7961, 2022.

[23] M. Lnenicka and S. Saxena, “Re-Defining Open Government Data Standards for Smart Cities’ Websites: A Case Study of Selected Cities,” Digit. Policy, Regul. Gov., vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 398–411, Jan. 2021.

[24] J. Ham, Y. Koo, and J. N. Lee, “Provision and Usage of Open Government Data: Strategic Transformation Paths,” Ind. Manag. Data Syst., vol. 119, no. 8, pp. 1841– 1858, 2019.

[25] I. Safarov, “Institutional Dimensions of Open Government Data Implementation: Evidence from the Netherlands, Sweden, and the UK,” Public Perform. Manag. Rev., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 305–328, 2019.

[26] B. Romadiyanti, “Government Procurement Policy: Comparative Study between Indonesia and The United States,” J. Transform., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 181–200, 2022.

[27] D. Kartika, “The Impact of E-Procurement Implementation on Public Procurement’s Corruption Cases; Evidence from Indonesia and India,” J. Kaji. Wil., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 193–212, 2022.

[28] I. Syafar, L. O. Husen, and A. Razak, “Urgensi Keterbukaan Informasi Publik Data Evaluasi Penyedia Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah,” J. Lex Gen., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 418–437, 2022.

[29] Sugimin, “Non-Compliance Practices in Emergency Public Procurement Context of Handling Covid-19 Pandemic in Indonesia,” Syiah Kuala Law J., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 16–26, 2022.

[30] M. Mustafa, “The Political Economy of Public Procurement Reform and Democratic Decentralisation in Indonesia,” Indones. J. Polit. Stud., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2021.

[31] L. Maritaa et al., “Contribution of Public e-Procurement to Sustainable Development Goals in Indonesia: Systematic Literature Review,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 249–258, 2021.

[32] A. Kamilah and M. Z. K. Khan, “Optimizing the Implementation of Beneficial Ownership in Transfer Pricing in Taxes as a Corporate Crime,” Lex Publica, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 47–64, 2021.

[33] N. Novariza, “Pengaturan Transparansi Beneficial Ownership di Sektor Jasa Keuangan dalam Rangka Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan TPPU,” Pampas J. Crim. Law, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 37–58, 2021.

[34] M. R. H. Amal and A. Kartika, “Beneficial Ownership Arrangements in Saving Loan Cooperative as A Preventive Attempt to The Crime of Money Laundering,” Eur. J. Soc. Sci. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 163–177, 2021.

[35] R. Wulandari and M. K. Dermawan, “Construction of Anti-Money Laundering Policy in Indonesia from an International Law,” Balt. J. Law Polit., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1179–1199, 2022.

[36] A. Agustianto, “Pentingnya Transparansi Beneficial Ownership oleh Korporasi,” Justisi, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 108–118, 2022.

[37] W. Rakayana, M. Sudarma, and R. Rosidi, “The Structure of Company Ownership and Tax Avoidance in Indonesia,” nternationalResearch J. Manag. IT Soc. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 296–305, 2021.

[38] J. Ginting and A. T. Khairunnisa, “Adopting the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations in Realizing Beneficial Owners Transparency in Limited Companies to Prevent Money Laundering Criminal Acts in Indonesia,” J. Leg. Ethical Regul, vol. 24, no. 4, 2021.

[39] J. Chen, “Representing Chinese Indonesians: Pribumi Discourse and Regional Elections in Post-Reform Indonesia,” J. Curr. Southeast Asian Aff., vol. 41, no. 1, 2021.

[40] F. Mubarok, “Social Media, Candidate Campaign And Quality Of Democracy,” J. Netralitas dan Pemilu, vol. 11, no. 1, 2021.

[41] M. Mahsun, M. Z. Elizabeth, and S. Mufrikhah, “Female Candidates, Islamic Women’s Organisations, and Clientelism in the 2019 Indonesian Elections,” J. Curr. Southeast Asian Aff., vol. 40, no. 1, 2021.

[42] R. Halida, H. Susianto, and S. Mujani, “Vote-Selling as Unethical Behavior: Effects of Voter’s Inhibitory Self-Control, Decision Toward Vote-Buying Money, and Candidate’s Quality in Indonesia Election,” J. Soc. Polit. Psychol., vol. 10, no. 2, 2022.

[43] M. I. Kabullah and N. Fajri, “Neo-Ibuism in Indonesian Politics: Election Campaigns of Wives of Regional Heads in West Sumatra in 2019,” J. Curr. Southeast Asian Aff., vol. 40, no. 1, 2021.

[44] M. Buehler, R. Nataatmadja, and I. Anugrah, “Limitations to Subnational Authoritarianism: Indonesian Local Government Head Elections in Comparative Perspective,” Reg. Fed. Stud., vol. 31, no. 3, 2021.

[45] E. Kusdarini, A. Priyanto, S. Hartini, and S. Suripno, “Roles of Justice Courts: Settlement of General Election Administrative Disputes in Indonesia,” Heliyon, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022.

[46] S. B. E. Wardani and V. S. Subekti, “Political Dynasties and Women Candidates in Indonesia’s 2019 Election,” J. Curr. Southeast Asian Aff., vol. 40, no. 1, 2021.

[47] F. Silalahi and M. Tampubolon, “General Election Based on the Principle of Luber- Jurdil and Its Development in Indonesia,” Tech. Soc. Sci., vol. 20, no. 2, 2021.

[48] N. W. Rustiarini, S. Sutrisno, N. Nurkholis, and W. Andayani, “Fraud Triangle in Public Procurement: Evidence From Indonesia,” J. Financ. Crime, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 951– 968, 2019.

[49] H. L. Wahyono, J. U. D. Hadmoko, and R. Z. Tamin, “State Financial Losses in Public Procurement Construction Projects in Indonesia,” Buildings, vol. 9, no. 5, 2019.

[50] G. U. Atmo, C. Duffield, L. Zhang, and D. I. Wilson, “Comparative Performance of PPPS and Traditional Procurement Projects in Indonesia,” Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 118–136, 2019.

[51] J. Arifin and T. Hartadi, “The Implementation of Probity Audit to Prevent Fraud in Public Procurement of Goods and Services for Government Agencies,” J. Akunt. dan Audit. Indones., vol. 24, no. 1, 2020.

[52] G. Tomossy and S. Alam, “Shifting Public Procurement towards Sustainability: A Comparative Case Study of Indonesia and Australia,” Aust. J. Asian Law, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 185–198, 2019.

[53] M. E. Putri and Y. Ruldeviyani, “Prioritization Strategy for Government’s Website Information Quality: Case Study: Indonesia National Public Procurement Agency,” in International Conference on Information Technology and Computer Communications, 2019, pp. 37–44.

[54] A. P. Wicaksono, D. Urumsah, and F. Asmui, “The Implementation of E-procurement System: Indonesia Evidence,” in Annual Conference of the Asian Academic Accounting Association, 2019, p. 9.

[55] R. Agustin and D. Susilowati, “Preventing Corruption With Blockchain Technology (Case Study of Indonesian Public Procurement ),” Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res., vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 2377–2383, 2019.

[56] J. Y. Hui, “Social Media and The 2019 Indonesian Elections,” Southeast Asian Aff., vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 155–172, 2020.

[57] I. Susila, D. Dean, R. N. R. Yusof, A. A. Setyawan, and F. Wajdi, “Symbolic Political Communication, and Trust: A Young Voters’ Perspective of the Indonesian Presidential Election,” J. Polit. Mark., vol. 19, no. 2, 2020.

[58] S. Mujani and N. Kuipers, “Who Believed Misinformation during the 2019 Indonesian Election?,” Asian Surv., vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1029–1043, 2020.

[59] G. T. I. Tawakkal, R. Damayanti, T. Subekti, F. Alfian, and A. D. Garner, “Social Networks and Brokerage Behavior in Indonesian Elections: Evidence From Central Java,” Asian Aff. An Am. Rev., vol. 47, no. 4, 2020.

[60] A. R. Arifianto, “What the 2019 Election Says about Indonesian Democracy,” Asia Policy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 46–53, 2019.

[61] A. Alfada, “The Destructive Effect of Corruption on Economic Growth In Indonesia: A Threshold Model,” Heliyon, vol. 5, no. 10, 2019.

[62] B. D. Lewis and A. Hendrawan, “The Impact of Majority Coalitions on Local Government Spending, Service Delivery, and Corruption in Indonesia,” Eur. J. Polit. Econ., vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 178–191, 2019.

[63] Dicky, “Sejarah Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Beneficial Owner di Indonesia,” J. Ilmu Sos. dan Pendidik., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 137–149, 2020.

[64] L. M. Syarif and F. Faisal, “Addressing the Root of Political Corruption in Indonesia,” Integritas, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 191–198, 2019.

[65] M. Najih and F. Wiryani, “Learning the Social Impact of Corruption: A Study of Legal Policy and Corruption Prevention in Indonesia and Malaysia,” J. Soc. Stud. Educ. Res., vol. 11, no. 4, 2020.

[66] A. Harefa, “Criminal Law Policy Through The Application of Capital Punishment on Corruption in Indonesia,” Int. J. Multiscience, vol. 5, no. 1, 2020.

[67] D. Setyaningrum, “E-Government as an Anti-Corruption Tool: Experience From Indonesia,” Acc. Fin. Rev., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 32–39, 2017.

[68] I. K. Seregig, “Motives of Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia,” Yustisia, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 228–246, 2018.

[69] H. Y. Prabowo and S. Suhernita, “Be Like Water: Developing A Fluid Corruption Prevention Strategy,” J. Financ. Crime, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 997–1023, 2018.

[70] Gideon, Edgar, Ivan, and Nabil, “Correlation Between Tax Policy and Corruption in the Legal Perspective for Country’s Economic Growth,” Hang Tuah Law J., vol. 11, no. 2, 2017.

[71] A. G. Wibisana and A. N. Marbun, “Corporate Criminal Liability in Indonesia Anti- Corruption Law: Does It Work Properly?,” Asian J. Law Econ., vol. 24, no. 3, 2017.

[72] M. S. Armira, “Democracy through Election: A Study on the Conflict of Norms in Aceh’s Election Process,” J. Southeast Asian Hum. Right, vol. 2, no. 1, 2018.

[73] E. Aspinall and N. Rohman, “Village Head Elections in Java: Money Politics And Brokerage in The Remaking of Indonesia’s Rural Elite,” J. Southeast Asian Stud., vol. 48, no. 1, 2017.

[74] D. Mariana and L. H. Husin, “Democracy, Local Election, and Political Dynasty in Indonesian Politics,” J. Wacana Polit., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 88–97, 2017.

[75] B. Hillman, “Increasing Women’s Parliamentary Representation in Asia and the Pacific: The Indonesian Experience,” Asia Pacific Policy Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 38–49, 2017.

[76] E. Aspinall and W. Mas’udi, “The 2017 Pilkada (Local Elections) in Indonesia: Clientelism, Programmatic Politics and Social Networks,” Contemp. Southeast Asia A J. Int. Strateg. Aff., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 417–426, 2017.

[77] J. Simatupang and M. Subekhan, “The Influence of Money Political Culture in Elections on the Sustainability of Indonesian Democracy,” Law Res. Rev. Q., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1297–1312, 2018.

[78] S. Lewis-Faupel, Y. Neggers, B. A. Olken, and R. Pande, “Can Electronic Procurement Improve Infrastructure Provision? Evidence from Public Works in India and Indonesia,” Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 258–283, 2016.

[79] Y. S. Nugroho and Zulkifli, “Akuntabilitas Publik Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah Secara Elektronik (E-Procurement) di Pemerintah Daerah,” J. Ris. Manaj., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 173–184, 2018.

[80] A. L. P. I. S. Diar and N. F. A. Budi, “The Determinant Factors of Individual Performance from Task Technology Fit and IS Success Model Perspectives: A Case of Public Procurement Plan Information System (SIRUP),” in International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems, 2018, pp. 219–229.

[81] A. Maulidi, “The Investigation and Elimination of Public Procurement Fraud in Government Sectors (A Case Study in Indonesia’s Procurement System),” Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 145–154, 2017.