Published date: Apr 03 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE 2022): Learning Materials and Modules

Pages: 83–90

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i8.15489

Meirin Dwiningtyas Putrimeirindwi@gmail.comDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jalan Dr. Setiabudi 229 Bandung, Indonesia

Adi RahmatDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jalan Dr. Setiabudi 229 Bandung, Indonesia

Yayan SanjayaDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Jalan Dr. Setiabudi 229 Bandung, Indonesia

Cognitive load is related to working memory capacity, which affects the cognitive processing system. This study aimed to control the cognitive load of students by using chunking techniques combined with the writing is thinking technique when learning about the human reproductive system. The research was conducted at a senior high school in Tasikmalaya City during the 2020/2021 academic year. 56 research subjects were divided into two groups - the experimental group and the control group. The research method used was quasi-experimental with a post-test-only control group design. Measurement of students’ cognitive load included intrinsic cognitive load (ICL), extraneous cognitive load (ECL), and germane cognitive load (GCL), which was measured using an instrument in the form of a subjective rating scale questionnaire with a scale of 1 – 8. The results showed that learning about the human reproductive system using the chunking technique combined with the writing and thinking technique obtained the average value of a student’s ability to receive and process information was 38.4 (low ICL). The average value of mental effort was 32.8 (low ECL), and the average value of the cognitive load related to student learning outcomes was 73.7 (high GCL). Based on the results of statistical tests with the Mann Whitney two-mean difference test, there were significant differences in the ICL, ECL, and GCL components between the experimental group and the control group, so the use of chunking techniques combined with writing is a thinking technique that can control the cognitive load. The chunking technique combined with writing is a thinking technique that is able to optimize working memory capacity by managing pieces of information and helping students construct knowledge by rewriting the information obtained using their own language.

Keywords: chunking techniques, writing is thinking technique, human reproductive system

[1] Rahmat A, Hindriana AF. Beban kognitif mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran fungsi terintegrasi struktur tumbuhan berbasis dimensi belajar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2014;20(1):66–74.

[2] Rahmat A, Nuraeni E, Soesilawaty SA, Alawiyah D, Garnasih T. Beban kognitif dan kemampuan penalaran siswa SMA, MA, dan SMA berbasis pesantren pada pembelajaran Biologi.. Prosiding Semnas Sains & Entrepreneurship Ii. 2015;1994:240–245.

[3] Ardayeni E, Yuhana Y, Hendrayana A. Analisis germane cognitive load siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar matematis pada pembelajaran contextual teaching and learning. Jurnal Math Educator Nusantara: Wahana Publikasi Karya Tulis Ilmiah di Bidang Pendidikan Matematika. 2019;5(01):26.

[4] Selviana D, Susanti R, Sri Iswari R. Education pengembangan lks berbasis inkuiri terbimbing pada materi struktur dan fungsi jaringan tumbuhan di smp. Unnes Journal of Biology Education. 2016;5(2):50229.

[5] Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. 1956;63(2).

[6] Scharfenberg FJ, Bogner FX. Teaching gene technology in an outreach lab: students assigned cognitive load clusters and the clusters’ relationships to learner characteristics, laboratory variables, and cognitive achievement. Res Sci Educ. 2013;43(1):141–61.

[7] van Merriënboer JJ, Sweller J. Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):85–93.

[8] Klepsch M, Seufert T. Understanding instructional design effects by differentiated measurement of intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Instr Sci. 2020;48(1):45–77.

[9] Leonard L. Cognitive load and Asperger’: teaching relevance. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters. 2015;5(1):12–7.

[10] Klepsch M, Schmitz F, Seufert T. Development and validation of two instruments measuring intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Frontiers in Psychology. 2017;8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01997.

[11] Juanengsih N, Rahmat A, Wulan AR, Rahman T. Pengukuran beban kognitif mahasiswa dalam perkuliahan biologi sel measuring student cognitive load in cell biology lectures. Jurnal EDUSAINS. 2018;10(1):171–4.

[12] Fountain SB, Doyle KE. Learning by chunking. In: Seel NM, editor. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Boston (MA): Springer US; 2012. pp. 1814–7.

[13] Greenstein G. Writing is thinking: using writing to teach science. Astronomy Education Review. 2013;12(1).

[14] Rahmi EG. Pengembangan LKS pada materi struktur dan fungsi jaringan tumbuhan berbasis pendekatan inkuiri di SMA Negeri 1 Canduang. Journal of Komodo Science Education. 2018;1(1):15–21.