Published date: Mar 19 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: IAPA 2023 Annual International Conference

Pages: 82–92

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i7.15467

Melizubaida mahmudmelizubaida78@gmail.comDoctor of Public Administration Program, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Asna AnetaDoctor of Public Administration Program, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Yanti AnetaDoctor of Public Administration Program, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Udin HamimDoctor of Public Administration Program, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

This study aims to analyze the unemployment policy program by the Regional Government of Bone Bolango Regency. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach. Data collection techniques include in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with experts and practitioners. The results illustrate that unemployment policy programs implemented by the local government of Bone Bolango Regency, including the WUB (New Entrepreneur), TKM (Millennial Workforce), and KUP (Productive Business Group) programs, have not been fully implemented optimally. In the process of implementing the unemployment policy program by the local government of Bone Bolango Regency, several stages of policy program implementation have not been optimally carried out including the relevance of the policy program, consideration of policy formulation, policy implementation, and policy outputs and outcomes.

Keywords: policy program, unemployment

[1] Sukirno S. Makro ekonomi: teori pengantar (cetakan 2). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada; 2011.

[2] Simanjuntak PJ. Pengantar ekonomi sumber daya manusia. Fakultas Ekonomi UI; 1938.

[3] Yuliadi DI. Teori Ekonomi Makro Islam. Rajawali Pers; 2019.

[4] Harapan K, et al. Implementasi Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Melalui Program. E-Journal Ung. 2021;2:39–49.

[5] Dewita HY. “Government Strategies and policies in tackling unemployment,”. Economica. 2018;1(2):208–13.

[6] Badan Pusat Statistik KB. “Angka Partisipasi murni (APM) dan Angka Partisipasi Kasar (APK) Menurut Jenjang Pendidikan (Persen),” bonebolangokab.bps.go.id, 2019.

[7] Boudarbat B, Chernoff V. “The Determinants of Education-Job Match Among Cnadian University Graduates,” Electronic: Journal, 2012.

[8] Robst J. Education and Job Match: the Relatedness of College major and work. Econ Educ Rev. 2007;26(4):397–407.

[9] Sloanne P. “Much ado about nothing? what does the overeducation literature really tell us?” Overeducation in europe in Theory and Policy, pp. 11-49, 2003.

[10] Subarsono A. Analisis Kebijakan Publik: Konsep, Teori dan Aplikasi. Pustaka Pelajar; 2012.

[11] Winarno B. Kebijakan publik teori, proses, dan studi kasus, Center for academic. Public Service; 2012.

[12] Muadi S, Sofwan I. A, “Konsep dan Kajian Teori Perumusan Kebijakan Publik,”. Jurnal Review Politik. 2016;6(2):195–224.

[13] Sore UB, Sobirin. Kebijakan Publik, Cv. Sah Media; 2017.

[14] Aripin S, Daud M. Peran Administrator Publik dalam Formulasi dan Implementasi Kebijakan Analisis. Journal Academica. 2014;6(1):1158–69.

[15] Agustino L. Politik dan Kebijakan Publik. Bandung: AIPI Bandung; 2006.