Published date: Mar 12 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 6th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (6th ICESRE)

Pages: 327–334

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i6.15282

Nujmatul Lailynujmatul.laily.fe@um.ac.idAccounting Department, Universitas Negeri Malang, 65114, Indonesia

Sulikah .Accounting Department, Universitas Negeri Malang, 65114, Indonesia

Aulia HerdianiAccounting Department, Universitas Negeri Malang, 65114, Indonesia

Lutfi ArdhaniAccounting Department, Uin Maulana Malik Ibrahim, 65144, Indonesia

Hybrid learning is an alternative learning that can provide wider access for students to learn and increase student’s participation in learning. Student’s involvement in the hybrid learning model is an interesting and important issue to be researched. This study aims to examine whether there are differences in cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, social engagement, behavioral engagement, and collaborative engagement in hybrid learning. This research is an experimental research. A total of 52 accounting students participated in the research respondents were given treatment in the form of implementing hybrid learning. The t-test is used to determine whether there is differences in social engagement, cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, behavioral engagement, and collaborative engagement in hybrid learning. The results show that student engagement is different before and after the implementation of hybrid learning based on the five dimensions of engagement. Educators who intend to increase student engagement can use hybrid learning.

Keywords: engagement, hybrid learning, accounting, participation

[1] Dhawan S. Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis. J Educ Technol Syst. 2020;49(1):5–22.

[2] Malan M. Engaging students in a fully online accounting degree: an action research study. Account Educ. 2020;29(4):321–39.

[3] Correia AP, Liu C, Xu F. Evaluating videoconferencing systems for the quality of the educational experience. Distance Educ. 2020;00(00):1–24.

[4] Malan M. Engaging students in a fully online accounting degree: an action research study. Account Educ. 2020;0(0):1–19.

[5] Huang R, Tlili A, Chang TW, Zhang X, Nascimbeni F, Burgos D. Disrupted classes, undisrupted learning during COVID-19 outbreak in China: application of open educational practices and resources. Smart Learn. Environ. 2020;7(1):19.

[6] Rahardjo W, Qomariyah N, Mulyani I, Andriani I. Social media fatigue pada mahasiswa di masa pandemi COVID-19: peran neurotisisme, kelebihan informasi, invasion of life, kecemasan, dan jenis kelamin. Psikol. Sos. 2020;18(59):12.

[7] Brown A, Lawrence J, Basson M, Redmond P. A conceptual framework to enhance student online learning and engagement in higher education. High Educ Res Dev. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1860912.

[8] Müller C, Mildenberger T. Facilitating flexible learning by replacing classroom time with an online learning environment: A systematic review of blended learning in higher education. Educ Res Rev. 2021;34(April):100394.

[9] Anthony B, et al. Blended Learning Adoption and Implementation in Higher Education: A Theoretical and Systematic Review, no. 0123456789. Springer Netherlands; 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09477-z.

[10] Hapke H, Lee-Post A, Dean T. 3-in-1 Hybrid Learning Environment. Mark Educ Rev. 2021;31(2):154–61.

[11] Adams D, Tan MH, Sumintono B. Students’ readiness for blended learning in a leading Malaysian private higher education institution. Interact Technol Smart Educ. 2021;18(4):515–34.

[12] Frick H, Birt J, Waters J. Enhancing student engagement in large management accounting lectures. Account Finance. 2020;60(1):271–98.

[13] Bond M, Buntins K, Bedenlier S, Zawacki-Richter O, Kerres M. Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: a systematic evidence map. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2020;17(1):2.

[14] Wonglorsaichon B, Wongwanich S, Wiratchai N. The Influence of Students School Engagement on Learning Achievement: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2014;116:1748–55.

[15] Robertson PJ, Clark RK, Watters MP. “A Hybrid Accounting Principles Course : The Best of Both Worlds,” pp. 70–78, 2004.

[16] Dawson K, Aileen N. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education SIGTE Award 2000. J Comput Teach Educ. 2014;17(1):37–41.

[17] Meydanlioglu A, Arikan F. Effect of Hybrid Learning in Higher Education. Int J Inf Commun Technol Educ. 2014;8(2):5.

[18] Waha B, Davis K. University students’ perspective on blended learning. J High Educ Policy Manage. 2014;36(2):172–82.