Published date:Mar 12 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 6th International Conference on Education and Social Science Research (6th ICESRE)

Pages:22–34

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i6.15251

I Ketut Darmaketutdarma@pnb.ac.idDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, State Polytechnic of Bali 80364, Indonesia

I Wayan SuastawaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, State Polytechnic of Bali 80364, Indonesia

I Putu DarmawaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, State Polytechnic of Bali 80364, Indonesia

The Independent Campus Learning (ICL) Policy is one of the policy studies the government is currently promoting to implement in universities. Implementing this policy in educational programs requires readiness in the study program. Having appropriate learning tools demonstrates this readiness and adherence to the ICL curriculum. In adherence to this policy, the D3 Engineering Study Program (SP) at Bali State Polytechnic (BSP) developed learning tools aligned with the ICL Curriculum. The objective of this study is to assess the feasibility of learning materials, including Semester Learning Plans (SLP) and textbooks oriented to the ICL curriculum in the D3 Mechanical Engineering study program. The developers employed a research and development approach, utilizing the Borg & Gall model modified into three development stages: preliminary studies, product design, and development and evaluation. The assessment of experts is used to review the feasibility aspect. The feasibility test involved three experts: content, media, and practitioners. Results indicate that the feasibility of Semester Learning Plans (SLP) and textbooks reached 87.5%, with 84.6% categorized as very feasible and appropriate. The Semester Learning Plans (SLP) and textbooks are straightforward and suitable for implementing the ICL curriculum in the BSP’s D3 Mechanical Engineering study program. Nonetheless, minor revisions are required. The implication is that after revision, Prototype I can proceed to the next development stage, involving practicality and testing product effectiveness.

Keywords: independent campus learning, curriculum, learning devices, feasibility

[1] Rosmiati R, Putra I, Nasori A. Pengukuran Mutu Pembelajaran di FKIP UNJA dalam Upaya Membangun Generasi Economic Citizen yang Mengelaborasi Program MBKBM Kemendikbud. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2021;3(6):5256–64.

[2] Arifin S, Muslim M. P-issn 2620-861x e-issn 2620-8628. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. 2020;3:1–11.

[3] Darajatun RM, Ramdhany M. Pengaruh Implementasi Kebijakan Kampus Merdeka terhadap Minat dan Keterlibatan Mahasiswa. Journal of Business Management Education. 2021;6:11–21.

[4] Syarifuddin FS, Hadi MI, Hapsari PD. Yanto O. Dosen Penggerak Dalam Era MBKM. Pertama, J. Gorontalo: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Gorontalo; 2021.

[5] Junaidi A, Wulandari D, Soetanto H, Kusumawardani SS. Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Profesi. IV. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan; 2020.

[6] Sodik J. Purwiyanta, Wijayanti DL. Village Economic Potential for The Implementation of Learning Building Village / KKN Thematic MBKM Program Economic Study Program Development Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business of The UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta. RSF ConferenceSeries: Business, Management and Social Sciences, Yogyakarta: Faculty of Economics and Business of the UPN “Veteran” Yogyakarta; 2021, p. 79–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31098/bmss.v1i3.317

[7] Haggarty L, Pepin B. An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: who gets an opportunity to learn what? Br Educ Res J. 2002;28(4):567–90.

[8] Trianto. Mengembangkan Model Pembelajaran Tematik. Cet. 1. Surabaya: Prestasi Pustakaraya; 2011.

[9] Suhadi. Petunjuk Perangkat pembelajaran. Surakarta: Universitas Muhammadyah; 2007.

[10] Susanti SJ, Rochmawati WI, Hardini HT. Pelatihan Penyusunan Perangkat Pembelajaran Bagi Guru SMK Program Keahlian Akuntansi Di Bangkalan [ JPMM]. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Madani. 2019;3:244–61.

[11] Permendikbud. Peraturan Mentri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi 2020.

[12] Butcher C, Davies C, Highton M. Designing learning from module outlineto effective teaching. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group; 2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203968482.

[13] Buzzing P. The framework for school inspection: a perspective on the effectiveness of teachers and school leaders. 1st Editio. New York: Routledge Falmer Taylor & Francis Group; 2004. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416242_chapter_2.

[14] Dick W, Lou C, Carey OJ. The Systematic Design of Instruction. 7 Edition. Hongkong: Pearson Education North Asia Ltd.,; 2003.

[15] Akver Van Den. Principles and methods of development research. In: van den Akker J, Branch RM, Gustafson K, Nieveen N, Plomp T, editors. In Design approaches and tools in education and training. Boston: Kluwer Academic; 1999. pp. 1–14.

[16] Akbar S. Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Cet. 1. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya; 2013.

[17] Nieveen NM. Formative evaluation in educational design. In T. Plomp, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An introduction to educational design research (pp. 89-101). Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO Netherlands institute for curriculum development; 2009.

[18] BSNP. Laporan BSNP 2010.

[19] Depdiknas. Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar. Jakarta: Departmen Pendidikan Nasional; 2008.

[20] Kemendikbud. Panduan Praktis Penyusunan E-Modul. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Atas; 2017.

[21] Chomsin S.Widodo J. Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Elex media komputindo; 2008.

[22] Widodo CS, Jasmadi. Panduan Menyusun Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Elex media komputindo; 2008.

[23] Noviarni. Perencanaan Pembelajaran Matematika. Pekanbaru: Benteng Media; 2014.