Published date: Jan 03 2024

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: 3rd International Conference on Humanities Education, Law and Social Sciences (3rd ICHELSS)

Pages: 596–603

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v9i2.14882

Amsal .amsalamsal31@gmail.comNational Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional), Indonesia

Hadi SupratiktaNational Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional), Indonesia

Djoko SulistyonoNational Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional), Indonesia

Purwadi .National Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional), Indonesia

Catur Wibowo Budi SantosoNational Research and Innovation Agency (Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional), Indonesia

This study aims to explore plagiarism behavior in higher education. This study employed a qualitative method with a case study design using the reflective notes technique to collect data from the participants. The data were collected through online submission. The authors, at this moment, employed a qualitative method by assigning the participants to write reflective notes to obtain the true responses to various questions. The approach used in this study is a case study approach to understand the object studied. Ten students of Universitas Negeri Makassar were invited to participate in this study, but only six met the valid reflective notes. The study found that students have different views on plagiarism behavior. Some problems highlighted in this study related to plagiarism behavior, such as lack of training in proper writing techniques, academic dishonesty, lack of access to library resources, lack of admiration for fellow writers, and little or no consequence for plagiarism cases.

Keywords: plagiarism behavior, higher education, case study, reflective notes technique

[1] Blum SD. My word!: Plagiarism and college culture. Cornell University Press; 2011.

[2] Pecorari D, Petrić B. Plagiarism in second-language writing. Language Teaching, 2014;47(3):269–302.

[3] Anderson MS, Steneck NH. The problem of plagiarism. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations. 2011;29(1):90–94.

[4] Evering LC, Moorman G. Rethinking plagiarism in the digital age. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. 2012;56(1):35–44.

[5] Helgesson G, Eriksson S. Plagiarism in research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy. 2015;18(1):91–101.

[6] Fatemi G, Saito E. Unintentional plagiarism and academic integrity: The challenges and needs of postgraduate international students in Australia. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 2020;44(10):1305–1319.

[7] Patak AA, Wirawan H, Abduh A, Hidayat R, Iskandar I, Dirawan GD. Teaching English as a foreign language in Indonesia: University lecturers’ views on plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2020

[8] Alajami A. Beyond originality in scientific research: Considering relations among originality, novelty, and ecological thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 2020;38:100723.

[9] Akbar A, Picard MA Akbar, Picard M. Understanding plagiarism in Indonesia from the lens of plagiarism policy: Lessons for universities. International Journal for Educational Integrity. 2019;15(1):7.

[10] Babaii E, Nejadghanbar H. Plagiarism among Iranian graduate students of language studies: Perspectives and causes. Ethics & Behavior. 2017;27(3):240–258.

[11] Yahya A. Teachers’ job satisfaction in instructional delivery modalities, and the role of school leaders: A study among selected private schools in Abu Dhabi [dissertation]. Abu Dhabi: British University in Dubai; 2022.

[12] Gonzalez C, Pelayo EJU. The mediating effect of leader accountability on the relationship between transcendental leadership of school heads and teacher selfefficacy. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership. 2022;2(2):83–104.

[13] Hayden HE, Chiu MM. Reflective teaching via a problem exploration–teaching adaptations–resolution cycle: A mixed methods study of preservice teachers’ reflective notes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 2015;9(2):133–153.

[14] Tomaszewski LE, Zarestky J, Gonzalez E. Planning qualitative research: Design and decision making for new researchers. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2020;19:160940692096717.

[15] Ampuni S, Kautsari N, Maharani M, Kuswardani S, Buwono SBS. Academic dishonesty in Indonesian college students: An investigation from a moral psychology perspective. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2020;18(4):395–417.

[16] Kirchknopf A. Rewriting the Victorians: Modes of literary engagement with the 19th century. McFarland; 2013.

[17] Woolls D. Detecting plagiarism. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. 2012.

[18] Andreescu L. Self-plagiarism in academic publishing: The anatomy of a misnomer. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2013;19(3):775–797.

[19] Şahin M, Duman D, Gürses S, Kaleş D, Woolls D. Toward an empirical methodology for identifying plagiarism in retranslation. Perspectives on Retranslation. 2018:166–191.

[20] Habibzadeh F, Shashok K. Plagiarism in scientific writing: Words or ideas? Croatian Medical Journal. 2011;52(4):576.

[21] Löfström E, Kupila P. The instructional challenges of student plagiarism. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2013;11(3):231–242.

[22] Pecorari D. Teaching to avoid plagiarism: How to promote good source use. UK: McGraw-Hill Education; 2013.

[23] Rezanejad A, Rezaei S. Academic dishonesty at universities: The case of plagiarism among Iranian language students. Journal of Academic Ethics. 2013;11(4)275–295.