Published date: Dec 07 2023

Journal Title: KnE Social Sciences

Issue title: The International Conference on Environmental, Social and Governance (ICESG 2022)

Pages: 726–744

DOI: 10.18502/kss.v8i20.14634

Faiza Siddiquifaiza_21002834@utp.edu.myDepartment of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS

Rohani SallehDepartment of Management and Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS

The increasing concern regarding the impact of energy consumption on the environment and the 2050 net-zero emission target necessitates the investigation of behavioral studies in energy consumption among employees. This study aims to develop a conceptual framework for future research on sustainable consumption behavior, specifically focusing on millennials. The conceptual framework links millennials’ sustainable consumption behavior to proactive work behavior through the lens of workplace spirituality. To develop this framework, the paper reviewed published studies related to sustainable consumption behaviors, work values, and behavioral factors across different generations. The review utilized computerized keyword searches in scholarly databases such as SpringerLink, Emerald, ScienceDirect, ProQuest, and Google Scholar. Based on the review’s empirical findings, narrative examples were drawn to construct the conceptual framework. The findings emphasize the importance of exploring millennials’ sustainable consumption behavior in relation to their values and behavioral factors. Proactive work behavior and workplace spirituality are identified as actionable elements to promote sustainable consumption behaviors among employees in the energy sector. Workplace spirituality is proposed as a moderating variable for the relationship between sustainable consumption behaviors and proactive work behavior, providing potential for further research in this area. Given that millennials are a significant generation in achieving sustainable energy consumption goals by 2050, this study focuses on their hiring and training to drive sustainable behavior. It evaluates the influence of HR and organizational behavior factors on sustainable consumption behavior in the energy industry. Practical implications and recommendations aim to assist practitioners and policymakers in analyzing behavioral phenomena to establish and implement sustainable goals for millennials. The paper extends the conceptual underpinning of sustainable consumption behavior by integrating proactive work behavior and workplace spirituality in the context of energy sector millennials. It paves the way for future researchers to empirically investigate and examine these variables in the energy sector. The study’s significance lies in its conceptual contributions to the existing body of knowledge in the field of sustainable consumption behavior.

Keywords: energy sector, millennials generation, sustainable consumption behaviors, proactive work behavior, workplace spirituality

[1] Aftab J, Sarwar H, Kiran A, Qureshi MI, Ishaq MI, Ambreen S, Kayani AJ. Ethical leadership, workplace spirituality, and job satisfaction: moderating role of selfefficacy. International Journal of Emerging Markets, (ahead-of-print). 2022.

[2] Araújo AC, Oliveira VM, Correia SE. (2021). Sustainable consumption: Thematic evolution from 1999 to 2019. Revista de Administração Mackenzie. 22(2):1– 34. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-6971/eRAMG210209

[3] Ali FM. Impact of proactive behavior on sustainable performance [TURCOMAT]. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education. 2021;12(12):4416–4423.

[4] Abdulrazak S, Quoquab F. Exploring consumers’ motivations for sustainable consumption: A self-deterministic approach. Journal of International Consumer Marketing. 2018;30(1):14–28.

[5] Batool A, Shabbir R, Abrar M, Bilal AR. Do fear and perceived knowledge of Covid- 19 drive sustainable consumption behaviour in Muslims? The mediating role of religiosity. Journal of Islamic Marketing, (ahead-of-print). 2022.

[6] Bulut ZA, Kökalan Çimrin F, Doğan O. Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2017;41(6):597–604.

[7] Bindl UK, Parker SK. Proactive work behavior: Forward-thinking and change-oriented action in organizations. In APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol 2: Selecting and developing members for the organization. American Psychological Association. 2011:567-598.

[8] Cho M, Yoo JJ. Customer pressure and restaurant employee green creative behavior: serial mediation effects of restaurant ethical standards and employee green passion. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management. 2021;33(12):4505– 4525.

[9] Chen Y, Ghosh M, Liu Y, Zhao L. Media coverage of climate change and sustainable product consumption: evidence from the hybrid vehicle market. Journal of Marketing Research. 2019;56(6):995–1011.

[10] Chekima B, Chekima S, Syed Khalid Wafa SA, Igau OA, Sondoh Jr SL. Sustainable consumption: the effects of knowledge, cultural values, environmental advertising, and demographics. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology. 2016;23(2):210–220.

[11] Corral Verdugo V. The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2012;14(5):651–666.

[12] Chabowski BR, Mena JA, Gonzalez-Padron TL. The structure of sustainability research in marketing, 1958–2008: a basis for future research opportunities. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2011;39(1):55–70.

[13] Corral-Verdugo V, Garcia C, Castro L, Viramontes I, Limones R. Equity and sustainable lifestyles. In: Corral-Verdugo V, Garcia C, Frias M, editors. Psychological approaches to sustainability. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2010.

[14] Crant JM. Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management. 2000;26(3):435–462.

[15] Deci EL, Ryan RM. Self-determination theory. In: Van Lange PA, Kruglanski AW, Higgins ET, editors. Handbook of theories of social psychology. Sage Publications Ltd.; 2012:416–436.

[16] Fuchs D, Lorek S. Sustainable consumption: Political debate and actual impact. Volume 28. Sustainable Europe Research; 2004:123–150.

[17] Geiger SM, Fischer D, Schrader U. Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption: an integrative framework for the selection of relevant behaviors. Sustainable Development (Bradford). 2018;26(1):18–33.

[18] Hou X, Huang R. (2021, February). The Literature Review of Proactive Behavior at Work. In 2021 International Conference on Modern Education and Humanities Science (ICMEHS 2021) (pp. 129-132). Atlantis Press.

[19] Hobson K. Researching ‘sustainable consumption’. Asia Pacific Viewpoint. 2004;45(2):279–288.

[20] Jones P, Hillier D, Comfort D. Shopping for tomorrow: promoting sustainable consumption within food stores. Br Food J. 2011;113(7):935–48.

[21] Kaur J, Mogaji E, Wadera D, Gupta S. Sustainable consumption practices in Indian households: a saga of environment management linked to Indian ethos and generational differences. Society and Business Review; 2022.

[22] Kadic-Maglajlic S, Arslanagic-Kalajdzic M, Micevski M , Dlacic J, Zabkar V. Being engaged is a good thing: understanding sustainable consumption behavior among young adults. J Bus Res. 2019;104:644–54.

[23] Karakas F. Spirituality and performance in organizations: A literature review. J Bus Ethics. 2010;94(1):89–106.

[24] Kong N, Salzmann O, Steger U, Ionescu-Somers A. Moving business/industry towards sustainable consumption: the role of NGOs. Eur Manage J. 2002;20(2):109– 27.

[25] Lind HB, Nordfjærn T, Jørgensen SH, Rundmo T. The value-belief-norm theory, personal norms and sustainable travel mode choice in urban areas. J Environ Psychol. 2015;44:119–25.

[26] Lee K. Predictors of sustainable consumption among young educated consumers in Hong Kong. J Int Consum Mark. 2014;26(3):217–38.

[27] Lyons S, Kuron L. Generational differences in the workplace: A review of the evidence and directions for future research. J Organ Behav. 2014;35 S1:S139–57.

[28] Leung L. Generational differences in content generation in social media: the roles of the gratifications sought and of narcissism. Comput Human Behav. 2013;29(3):997– 1006.

[29] Meng, B., Lee, M. J., Chua, B. L., & Han, H. (2022). An integrated framework of behavioral reasoning theory, theory of planned behavior, moral norm and emotions for fostering hospitality/tourism employees’ sustainable behaviors. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, (ahead-of-print).

[30] Matharu M, Jain R, Kamboj S. Understanding the impact of lifestyle on sustainable consumption behaviors: a sharing economy perspective. Manag Environ Qual. 2020;32(1):20–40.

[31] Ma HY, Kao JC, Kao RH, Cho CC. How to shape the employees’ sustainable work attitude: the moderating effect of supervisor attitudes. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(20):8331.

[32] Minton EA, Kahle LR, Kim CH. Religion and motives for sustainable behaviors: A crosscultural comparison and contrast. Journal of Business Research. 2015;68(9):1937–1944.

[33] Piligrimienė Ž, Žukauskaitė A, Korzilius H, Banytė J, Dovalienė A. Internal and external determinants of consumer engagement in sustainable consumption. Sustainability (Basel). 2020;12(4):1349.

[34] PwC’s 14th Annual Global CEO Survey. 2011.

[35] Peattie K, Collins A. Guest editorial: perspectives on sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 2009;33(2):107–112.

[36] Quoquab F, Mohammad J. A review of sustainable consumption (2000 to 2020): what we know and what we need to know. Journal of Global Marketing. 2020;33(5):305– 334.

[37] Quoquab F, Mohammad J, Sukari NN. A multiple-item scale for measuring “sustainable consumption behaviour” construct: development and psychometric evaluation. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics. 2019;31(4):791–816.

[38] Reisch LA. Time and wealth. The role of time and temporalities for sustainable patterns of consumption. Time & Society. 2001;10(2-3):367–385.

[39] Svensson, G., & Padin, C. (2019). Industry note: Sustainable development requires economic, social and environmental sustainability: A business perspective. International Journal of Agriculture Innovation, Technology and Globalisation, 1.

[40] Srivastava AP. Teachers’ extra role behaviour: relation with self-efficacy, procedural justice, organisational commitment and support for training. International Journal of Management in Education. 2017;11(2):140–162.

[41] Somech A. The cost of going the extra mile: the relationship between teachers’ organizational citizenship behavior, role stressors, and strain with the buffering effect of job autonomy. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016;22(4):426–447.

[42] Steg L, Perlaviciute G, van der Werff E. Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015 Jun;6(805):805.

[43] Strauss K, Griffin MA, Parker SK, Mason CM. Building and sustaining proactive behaviors: the role of adaptively and job satisfaction. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2015;30(1):63–72.

[44] Strauss K, Parker SK. Effective and sustained proactivity in the workplace: A selfdetermination theory perspective. 2014.

[45] Searle BJ, Rooney J. Proactivity at work: A path to organizational sustainability. Fresh thoughts in sustainable leadership, Tilde University Press. Prahan. 2013;VIC:84–96.

[46] Sheth JN, Sethia NK, Srinivas S. Mindful consumption: A customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 2011;39(1):21–39.

[47] Searle TP. A multilevel examination of proactive work behaviors: Contextual and individual differences as antecedents. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln; 2011.

[48] Seyfang G. Consuming values and contested cultures: A critical analysis of the UK strategy for sustainable consumption and production. Review of Social Economy. 2004;62(3):323–338.

[49] Tuan LT. Driving employees to serve customers beyond their roles in the Vietnamese hospitality industry: the roles of paternalistic leadership and discretionary HR practices. Tourism Management. 2018;69:132–144.

[50] Twenge JM. A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology. 2010;25(2):201–210.

[51] Tanner C, Kast SW. Promoting sustainable consumption: determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology & Marketing. 2003;20(10):883–902.

[52] Vermeir I, Verbeke W. Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude-behaviour intention” gap. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. 2006;19(2):169–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3.

[53] Fuchs DA, Lorek S. Sustainable consumption governance – A history of promises and failures. Journal of Consumer Policy. 2005;28(2):261–288.

[54] Wahab MA. Relationships between religious work values, sustainable work behaviours and sustainable energy consumptions: an empirical analysis using Muslim employees. Management Decision. 2017.